Transformation-based Hypervolume Indicator: A Framework for Designing Hypervolume Variants

The hypervolume indicator is a popular performance indicator in the field of Evolutionary Multi-objective optimization (EMO). However, there are two issues associated with it in addition to its large calculation cost for many-objective problems. The first issue is that the maximization of the hypervolume indicator leads to a non-uniform solution set on a nonlinear Pareto front. The second issue is that it cannot handle preference information. To address these two issues, some hypervolume variants have been proposed in the literature. In this paper, first we review these variants and extract the common characteristic among them, i.e., all these variants can be converted to the standard hypervolume indicator with a transformed solution set. Based on this observation, we propose the transformation-based hypervolume indicator, which is a framework for designing hypervolume variants. Then, we propose two new hypervolume variants based on our framework. Empirical studies suggest the effectiveness of the proposed variants for addressing the abovementioned two issues. Our experimental results also suggest the possibility of designing other hypervolume variants for different purposes using our framework.

[1]  Mark Fleischer,et al.  The measure of pareto optima: Applications to multi-objective metaheuristics , 2003 .

[2]  Heike Trautmann,et al.  Integration of Preferences in Hypervolume-Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms by Means of Desirability Functions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[3]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  The Hypervolume Indicator Revisited: On the Design of Pareto-compliant Indicators Via Weighted Integration , 2007, EMO.

[4]  Tobias Friedrich,et al.  The logarithmic hypervolume indicator , 2011, FOGA '11.

[5]  Lucas Bradstreet,et al.  A Fast Way of Calculating Exact Hypervolumes , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[6]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  A Study of the Parallelization of a Coevolutionary Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm , 2004, MICAI.

[7]  Nicola Beume,et al.  An EMO Algorithm Using the Hypervolume Measure as Selection Criterion , 2005, EMO.

[8]  Shengxiang Yang,et al.  On the use of hypervolume for diversity measurement of Pareto front approximations , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[9]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Scalable Test Problems for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2005, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization.

[10]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[11]  Ye Tian,et al.  PlatEMO: A MATLAB Platform for Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization [Educational Forum] , 2017, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[12]  Luís M. S. Russo,et al.  Quick Hypervolume , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  On the construction of pareto-compliant quality indicators , 2019, GECCO.

[14]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Comparison of Hypervolume, IGD and IGD+ from the Viewpoint of Optimal Distributions of Solutions , 2019, EMO.

[15]  Anne Auger,et al.  Theory of the hypervolume indicator: optimal μ-distributions and the choice of the reference point , 2009, FOGA '09.

[16]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  R-HV: A Metric for Computing Hyper-volume for Reference Point Based EMOs , 2014, SEMCCO.

[17]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study , 1998, PPSN.

[18]  Iryna Yevseyeva,et al.  On Reference Point Free Weighted Hypervolume Indicators based on Desirability Functions and their Probabilistic Interpretation , 2014 .

[19]  Michael T. M. Emmerich,et al.  Cone-Based Hypervolume Indicators: Construction, Properties, and Efficient Computation , 2013, EMO.

[20]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part II: Handling Constraints and Extending to an Adaptive Approach , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Modified Distance Calculation in Generational Distance and Inverted Generational Distance , 2015, EMO.

[22]  Xin Yao,et al.  R-Metric: Evaluating the Performance of Preference-Based Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Using Reference Points , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[23]  Hisao Ishibuchi,et al.  Reference point specification in hypervolume calculation for fair comparison and efficient search , 2017, GECCO.

[24]  M. Hansen,et al.  Evaluating the quality of approximations to the non-dominated set , 1998 .

[25]  Nicola Beume,et al.  SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  E. Zitzler,et al.  Directed Multiobjective Optimization Based on the Weighted Hypervolume Indicator , 2013 .

[27]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..