Patients' perspectives on high-tech home care: a qualitative inquiry into the user-friendliness of four technologies

BackgroundThe delivery of technology-enhanced home care is growing in most industrialized countries. The objective of our study was to document, from the patient's perspective, how the level of user-friendliness of medical technology influences its integration into the private and social lives of patients. Understanding what makes a technology user-friendly should help improve the design of home care services.MethodsFour home care interventions that are frequently used and vary in their technical and clinical features were selected: Antibiotic intravenous therapy, parenteral nutrition, peritoneal dialysis and oxygen therapy. Our qualitative study relied on the triangulation of three sources of data: 1) interviews with patients (n = 16); 2) interviews with carers (n = 6); and 3) direct observation of nursing visits of a different set of patients (n = 16). Participants of varying socioeconomic status were recruited through primary care organizations and hospitals that deliver home care within 100 km of Montreal, the largest urban area in the province of Quebec, Canada.ResultsThe four interventions have both a negative and positive effect on patients' lives. These technologies were rarely perceived as user-friendly, and user-acceptance was closely linked to user-competence. Compared with acute I.V. patients, who tended to be passive, chronic patients seemed keener to master technical aspects. While some of the technical and human barriers were managed well in the home setting, engaging in the social world was more problematic. Most patients found it difficult to maintain a regular job because of the high frequency of treatment, while some carers found their autonomy and social lives restricted. Patients also tended to withdraw from social activities because of social stigmatization and technical barriers.ConclusionsWhile technology contributes to improving the patients' health, it also imposes significant constraints on their lives. Policies aimed at developing home care must clearly integrate principles and resources supporting the appropriate use of technology. Close monitoring of patients should be part of all technology-enhanced home care programs.

[1]  Christina Sinding,et al.  Disarmed complaints: unpacking satisfaction with end-of-life care. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Nigel Fielding,et al.  Using Computers in Qualitative Research , 1991 .

[4]  The relevance of life histories for understanding health and healing , 1991 .

[5]  H. Rosendal,et al.  Issues in quality of high‐tech home care: sources of information and staff training in Quebec primary care organizations and relationships with hospitals , 2003 .

[6]  M. Sullivan,et al.  The new subjective medicine: taking the patient's point of view on health care and health. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[7]  P. Coyte,et al.  Applied home care research. , 1997, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[8]  Wizards and social control , 1995 .

[9]  J. McGarry.  The essence of 'community' within community nursing: a district nursing perspective. , 2003, Health & social care in the community.

[10]  E. Murphy,et al.  Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[11]  A. Carr,et al.  Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[12]  Marc Berg,et al.  The practice of medical technology. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[13]  Janine Pierret,et al.  The illness experience: state of knowledge and perspectives for research. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[14]  D. Cook,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. , 2000, JAMA.

[15]  K C Lun.  New user interfaces. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[16]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[17]  J. Lawton.  Lay experiences of health and illness: past research and future agendas. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[18]  M. Aubin,et al.  [Delivery of home health care. Survey of the Quebec region]. , 2000, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[19]  C. Pope,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health Care , 1999 .

[20]  K. Lowton,et al.  Life on a slippery slope: perceptions of health in adults with cystic fibrosis. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[21]  R M Angus,et al.  “Hospital at home” versus hospital care in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: prospective randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  V. García,et al.  Hospitalización a domicilio , 2002 .

[23]  Pascale Lehoux,et al.  Could New Regulatory Mechanisms Be Designed after a Critical Assessment of the Value of Health Innovations , 2002 .

[24]  S. Murray,et al.  Dying from cancer in developed and developing countries: lessons from two qualitative interview studies of patients and their carers , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  M. Zairi,et al.  Total partnership for primary health care provision: a proposed model--Part II. , 1998, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[26]  Pascale Lehoux,et al.  Technologies de pointe et soins à domicile. Où en sont les CLSC , 2002 .

[27]  Longman,et al.  Longman dictionary of the English language , 1992 .

[28]  J Savage,et al.  Ethnography and health care , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Designing devices that are acceptable to the frail elderly: a new understanding based upon how older people perceive a walker , 1997 .