Merger and acquisition evaluation and decision making model

Based on three merger and acquisition (M&A) methods and applying multiple-criteria decision making, the purpose of this paper is to establish an M&A evaluation model. The decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) results show that the three business M&A methods possess interactive effect and self-feedback relationships. This study utilizes the analytic network process to calculate the weights of seven evaluation criteria; expected stock dividend is ranked as the most important criterion, followed by stock price/earnings per share, stock dividend growth, sales/market capitalization ratio, discount rate, replacement value, and liquidation value. This study uses Vlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) to evaluate the performance of three Taiwanese banks. The results show that Bank B is the best M&A investment choice. Finally, the study establishes a comprehensive M&A decision making evaluation model.

[1]  Helen B Sitlington,et al.  Do downsizing decisions affect organisational knowledge and performance , 2011 .

[2]  L. Sommer,et al.  Intention as a cognitive antecedent to international entrepreneurship—understanding the moderating roles of knowledge and experience , 2011 .

[3]  T. J. Carroll The Information Content of Quarterly Dividend Changes , 1995 .

[4]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  Business Model Dynamics and Innovation: (Re)establishing the Missing Linkages , 2011 .

[5]  D. Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture , 2011 .

[6]  Yung‐Ching Ho,et al.  Technological and design capabilities: is ambidexterity possible? , 2011 .

[7]  U JINGLI,et al.  Equity Valuation Using Multiples , 2002 .

[8]  J. Florin,et al.  Inter‐firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer, innovation and value creation in networks , 2011 .

[9]  George N. Leledakis,et al.  Are Two Factors Enough? The U.K. Evidence , 2001 .

[10]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[11]  J. Sá,et al.  From Levitt to the global age: one more time, how do we define our business? , 2011 .

[12]  S. Hotho,et al.  Small businesses in the new creative industries: innovation as a people management challenge , 2011 .

[13]  C. Fee,et al.  Sources of Gains in Horizontal Mergers: Evidence from Customer, Supplier, and Rival Firms , 2003 .

[14]  A. Beckenstein Merger Activity and Merger Theories: An Empirical Investigation , 1979, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[15]  P. Curșeu,et al.  Social capital as a decision aid in strategic decision-making in service organizations , 2011 .

[16]  Rakesh B. Sambharya Security analysts' earnings forecasts as a measure of firm performance , 2011 .

[17]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  A Novel Hybrid MCDM Model Combined with DEMATEL and ANP with Applications , 2008 .

[18]  Hugo Tschirky,et al.  Integration Planning for Technology Intensive Acquisitions , 2004 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[20]  J. Negus,et al.  Structured product valuation methodologies in illiquid and volatile markets: three factors to consider when marking to model , 2009 .

[21]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Jens Gammelgaard Access to competence: An emerging acquisition motive , 2004 .

[23]  Mário Raposo,et al.  Stakeholder theory: issues to resolve , 2011 .

[24]  Francesco Schiavone Strategic reactions to technology competition , 2011 .

[25]  Volker Herrmann,et al.  Pricing with Performance-Controlled Multiples , 2003 .

[26]  J. Harrison,et al.  The Changing of the Guard: Turnover and Structural Change in the Top-Management Positions. , 1988 .

[27]  K. Huarng,et al.  Entrepreneurship, process innovation and value creation by a non‐profit SME , 2011 .

[28]  Anil Shivdasani,et al.  Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers , 1997 .

[29]  K. Fowler,et al.  POST-ACQUISITION FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION , 1990 .

[30]  Paul A. Gompers,et al.  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND EQUITY PRICES , 2002 .

[31]  N. Strong The explanatory power of earnings for stock returns , 1993 .

[32]  P. M. Fairfield,et al.  P/E, P/B and the Present Value of Future Dividends , 1994 .

[33]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[34]  J. Henseler,et al.  Technology-based service proposal screening and decision-making effectiveness , 2011 .

[35]  Jennifer Rowley,et al.  Towards an innovation‐type mapping tool , 2011 .

[36]  E. Fama Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation, and Money , 1981 .

[37]  Silvia Cantarello,et al.  External technology sourcing: evidence from design‐driven innovation , 2011 .

[38]  Jeffrey T. Macher,et al.  Organization Science , 2022 .

[39]  Michael Gort,et al.  An Economic Disturbance Theory of Mergers , 1969 .

[40]  Markku Kaustia,et al.  Should Good Stocks Have High Prices or High Returns? , 2009 .

[41]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: a multi-country study , 2011 .

[42]  J. Fred Weston,et al.  The Investment, Financing, and Valuation of the Corporation. , 1963 .

[43]  C. Park The Effects of Prior Performance on the Choice Between Related and Unrelated Acquisitions: Implications for the Performance Consequences of Diversification Strategy , 2002 .

[44]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  An Overview of the Design and Analysis of Simulation Experiments for Sensitivity Analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  The market for corporate control , 1983 .

[46]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  An Analytic Network Process Model for Financial-Crisis Forecasting , 2004 .

[47]  Sora Lee,et al.  Selection of technology acquisition mode using the analytic network process , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..

[48]  A. Goktan,et al.  Innovation speed and radicalness: are they inversely related? , 2011 .

[49]  Peter Easton Does the Peg Ratio Rank Stocks According to the Market's Expected Rate of Return on Equity Capital? , 2002 .

[50]  E. Fama STOCK PRICES, REAL ACTIVITY, INFLATION AND MONEY , 1981 .

[51]  E. Fama,et al.  The Corporate Cost of Capital and the Return on Corporate Investment , 1998 .

[52]  Annette B. Poulsen,et al.  The Returns to Acquiring Firms in Tender Offers: Evidence from Three Decades , 1989 .

[53]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[54]  Matthew T. Billett,et al.  Bondholder Wealth Effects in Mergers and Acquisitions: New Evidence from the 1980s and 1990s , 2002 .

[55]  G. William Schwert,et al.  Markup Pricing in Mergers and Acquisitions , 1996 .

[56]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence , 2002 .

[57]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[58]  Cevriye Gencer,et al.  Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm , 2007 .

[59]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach , 1992 .

[60]  Zhen Chen,et al.  An analytic network process for risks assessment in commercial real estate development , 2009 .

[61]  Kim Liebich How to Value a Bank , 1995 .

[62]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[63]  Gordon V. Smith Corporate valuation : a business and professional guide , 1988 .

[64]  J. Wincent,et al.  Entrepreneurs learning together: The importance of building trust for learning and exploiting business opportunities , 2011 .

[65]  Amir Ziv,et al.  Dividend Changes and Future Profitability , 2001 .

[66]  Stuart C. Gilson,et al.  Valuation of Bankrupt Firms , 1998 .

[67]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combined MCDM techniques for exploring stock selection based on Gordon model , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[68]  Wen-Hsien Tsai,et al.  Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[69]  Richard S. Ruback,et al.  The Valuation of Cash Flow Forecasts: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[70]  Erik Stafford,et al.  New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers , 2001 .

[71]  Sanjeev Bhojraj,et al.  Who Is My Peer? A Valuation-Based Approach to the Selection of Comparable Firms , 2002 .

[72]  Andrew W. Alford THE EFFECT OF THE SET OF COMPARABLE FIRMS ON THE ACCURACY OF THE PRICE EARNINGS VALUATION METHOD , 1992 .