How Users Perceive and Use Interactive Information Graphics: An Exploratory Study

This paper presents an exploratory empirical study about users’ reception and usage behavior with interactive information graphics. 14 participants took part in the study. We assume users to act interest-driven. Therefore no explicit tasks were assigned to participants. In order not to distract the user, retrospective thinking aloud was employed. Results show that (1) usage durations were heterogeneous between users and between different types of interactive information graphics; (2) users tended to watch introductory animations; (3) initial orientation without interaction on the first content screen (after intro) was rather long with 23 seconds on average; (4) story-based approaches seem to motivate users but might lead to less intensive reception of information; (5) several reception and usage problems have been identified regarding information presentation and interaction. Interactive information graphics tend to overwhelm users with too much information and disregard well-known principles and rules of the old media and web design.

[1]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Visual explanations , 2010, NPAR.

[2]  Peter Schumacher Rezeption als Interaktion , 2009 .

[3]  Taxonomie der Interaktivität von Multimedia – Ein Beitrag zur aktuellen Metadaten-Diskussion , 2002 .

[4]  Menno D. T. de Jong,et al.  Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: a methodological comparison , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[5]  Rosemary Ranck Picturing the world , 1995 .

[6]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[7]  John C. Gilmour Picturing the world , 1986 .

[8]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  A Cost-Effective Evaluation Method for Use by Designers , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[9]  Jennifer George-Palilonis,et al.  A Practical Guide to Graphics Reporting: Information Graphics for Print, Web & Broadcast , 2006 .

[10]  Victoria A. Bowers Concurrent versus Retrospective Verbal Protocol for Comparing Window Usability , 1990 .

[11]  Zhiwei Guan,et al.  The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking , 2006, CHI.

[12]  P. Boczkowski The Processes of Adopting Multimedia and Interactivity in Three Online Newsrooms , 2004 .

[13]  Andrew L. Mendelson,et al.  Readers’ interpretations of visual and verbal narratives of a National Geographic story on Saudi Arabia , 2009 .

[14]  W. Lindblad,et al.  The future is now , 2010, Nature.

[15]  M. D. de Jong,et al.  Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue , 2003 .