How Users Perceive and Use Interactive Information Graphics: An Exploratory Study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Michael Burmester | Wibke Weber | Ralph Tille | Marcus Mast | Wibke Weber | Ralph Tille | Marcus Mast | M. Burmester
[1] Matthew Stone,et al. Visual explanations , 2010, NPAR.
[2] Peter Schumacher. Rezeption als Interaktion , 2009 .
[3] Taxonomie der Interaktivität von Multimedia – Ein Beitrag zur aktuellen Metadaten-Diskussion , 2002 .
[4] Menno D. T. de Jong,et al. Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: a methodological comparison , 2004, Interact. Comput..
[5] Rosemary Ranck. Picturing the world , 1995 .
[6] Edward R. Tufte,et al. Envisioning Information , 1990 .
[7] John C. Gilmour. Picturing the world , 1986 .
[8] Peter C. Wright,et al. A Cost-Effective Evaluation Method for Use by Designers , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..
[9] Jennifer George-Palilonis,et al. A Practical Guide to Graphics Reporting: Information Graphics for Print, Web & Broadcast , 2006 .
[10] Victoria A. Bowers. Concurrent versus Retrospective Verbal Protocol for Comparing Window Usability , 1990 .
[11] Zhiwei Guan,et al. The validity of the stimulated retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking , 2006, CHI.
[12] P. Boczkowski. The Processes of Adopting Multimedia and Interactivity in Three Online Newsrooms , 2004 .
[13] Andrew L. Mendelson,et al. Readers’ interpretations of visual and verbal narratives of a National Geographic story on Saudi Arabia , 2009 .
[14] W. Lindblad,et al. The future is now , 2010, Nature.
[15] M. D. de Jong,et al. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue , 2003 .