Application of Solar Activity Time Series in Machine Learning Predictive Modeling of Precipitation-Induced Floods

This research is devoted to the determination of hidden dependencies between the flow of particles that come from the Sun and precipitation-induced floods in the United Kingdom (UK). The analysis covers 20 flood events during the period from October 2001 to December 2019. The parameters of solar activity were used as model input data, while precipitations data in the period 10 days before and during each flood event were used as model output. The time lag of 0–9 days was taken into account in the research. Correlation analysis was conducted to determine the degree of randomness for the time series of input and output parameters. For establishing a potential causative link, machine learning classification predictive modeling was applied. Two approaches, the decision tree, and the random forest were used. We analyzed the accuracy of classification models forecast from 0 to 9 days in advance. It was found that the most important factors for flood forecasting are proton density with a time lag of 9, differential proton flux in the range of 310–580 keV, and ion temperature. Research in this paper has shown that the decision tree model is more accurate and adequate in predicting the appearance of precipitation-induced floods up to 9 days ahead with an accuracy of 91%. The results of this study confirmed that by increasing technical capabilities, using improved machine learning techniques and large data sets, it is possible to improve the understanding of the physical link between the solar wind and tropospheric weather and help improve severe weather forecasting.

[1]  S. Grimaldi,et al.  Feature importance measures to dissect the role of sub-basins in shaping the catchment hydrological response: a proof of concept , 2022, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[2]  R. Tkachenko,et al.  Sm-Co ALLOYS COERCIVITY PREDICTION USING STACKING HETEROGENEOUS ENSEMBLE MODEL , 2021, Acta Metallurgica Slovaca.

[3]  P. Stott,et al.  Increase in the frequency of extreme daily precipitation in the United Kingdom in autumn , 2021 .

[4]  M. Zeleňáková,et al.  Heavy rainfall, floods, and flash floods influenced by high-speed solar wind coupling to the magnetosphere–ionosphere–atmosphere system , 2021, Annales Geophysicae.

[5]  J. Downs,et al.  Machine learning in geography–Past, present, and future , 2021 .

[6]  Amr Gharib,et al.  A workflow to address pitfalls and challenges in applying machine learning models to hydrology , 2021 .

[7]  Okke Batelaan,et al.  Ensemble machine learning paradigms in hydrology: A review , 2021, Journal of Hydrology.

[8]  M. Radovanović,et al.  Connection of Solar Activities and Forest Fires in 2018: Events in the USA (California), Portugal and Greece , 2020, Sustainability.

[9]  Georgia Papacharalampous,et al.  Super ensemble learning for daily streamflow forecasting: large-scale demonstration and comparison with multiple machine learning algorithms , 2020, Neural Computing and Applications.

[10]  Taher Rajaee,et al.  Artificial intelligence-based single and hybrid models for prediction of water quality in rivers: A review , 2020 .

[11]  Falk Heße,et al.  Challenges in Applying Machine Learning Models for Hydrological Inference: A Case Study for Flooding Events Across Germany , 2020, Water Resources Research.

[12]  Imran Sarwar Bajwa,et al.  An Intelligent Data Analysis for Recommendation Systems Using Machine Learning , 2019, Sci. Program..

[13]  M. Radovanović,et al.  Space weather and hurricanes Irma, Jose and Katia , 2019, Astrophysics and Space Science.

[14]  K. Burnecki,et al.  Impact of solar activity on precipitation in the United States , 2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[15]  Alexander Y. Sun,et al.  How can Big Data and machine learning benefit environment and water management: a survey of methods, applications, and future directions , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[16]  P. Prikryl,et al.  Rapid intensification of tropical cyclones in the context of the solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling , 2019, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics.

[17]  K. Mursula,et al.  Decadal variability in the Northern Hemisphere winter circulation: Effects of different solar and terrestrial drivers , 2018, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics.

[18]  M. Andrić,et al.  RESPONSES OF THE IONOSPHERIC D-REGION TO PERIODIC AND TRANSIENT VARIATIONS OF THE IONIZING SOLAR Lyα RADIATION , 2017 .

[19]  V. Vujčić,et al.  The effects of solar activity: Electrons in the terrestrial lower ionosphere , 2017 .

[20]  Milan M. Radovanović,et al.  Hurricane genesis modelling based on the relationship between solar activity and hurricanes II , 2017, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics.

[21]  R. Bruntz,et al.  Tropospheric weather influenced by solar wind through atmospheric vertical coupling downward control , 2017, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics.

[22]  S. Power,et al.  A vertical wind structure that leads to extreme rainfall and major flooding in southeast Australia , 2017 .

[23]  L. Kristoufek Has global warming modified the relationship between sunspot numbers and global temperatures , 2016, 1611.03646.

[24]  R. Bruntz,et al.  A link between high-speed solar wind streams and explosive extratropical cyclones , 2016 .

[25]  D. Vujović,et al.  Effect of solar activity on the repetitiveness of some meteorological phenomena , 2014 .

[26]  S. Veretenenko,et al.  Effect of solar and galactic cosmic rays on the duration of macrosynoptic processes , 2013, Geomagnetism and Aeronomy.

[27]  P. Thejll,et al.  Influence of energetic Solar Proton Events on the development of cyclonic processes at extratropical latitudes , 2013 .

[28]  J. Hannaford,et al.  Trends in seasonal river flow regimes in the UK , 2012 .

[29]  O. Humlum,et al.  The long sunspot cycle 23 predicts a significant temperature decrease in cycle 24 , 2012, 1202.1954.

[30]  James Manners,et al.  Solar forcing of winter climate variability in the Northern Hemisphere , 2011 .

[31]  Lihua Ma,et al.  Possible Influence of the 11-year Solar Cycle on Precipitation in Huashan Mountain of China over the Last 300 Years , 2010 .

[32]  J. Haigh,et al.  Top-down solar modulation of climate: evidence for centennial-scale change , 2010 .

[33]  D. Hannah,et al.  Modification of climate-river flow associations by basin properties , 2010 .

[34]  L. Desorgher,et al.  Sudden cosmic ray decreases: No change of global cloud cover , 2010 .

[35]  H. Svensmark,et al.  Cosmic ray decreases affect atmospheric aerosols and clouds , 2009 .

[36]  E. J. Klok,et al.  Updated and extended European dataset of daily climate observations , 2009 .

[37]  Mike Lockwood,et al.  SOLAR INFLUENCES ON CLIMATE , 2009 .

[38]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A compilation of data on European flash floods , 2009 .

[39]  P. Prikryl,et al.  The influence of solar wind on extratropical cyclones – Part 1: Wilcox effect revisited , 2009 .

[40]  G. Sofko,et al.  The influence of solar wind on extratropical cyclones – Part 2: A link mediated by auroral atmospheric gravity waves? , 2009 .

[41]  Kristján Jónasson,et al.  Cosmic rays, cloud condensation nuclei and clouds – a reassessment using MODIS data , 2008 .

[42]  J. Haigh The Sun and the Earth’s Climate , 2007 .

[43]  David M. Hannah,et al.  Large-Scale Climatic Controls on New England River Flow , 2007 .

[44]  D. Stephenson,et al.  Empirical evidence for a nonlinear effect of galactic cosmic rays on clouds , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  R. Narasimha,et al.  Possible association between Indian monsoon rainfall and solar activity , 2005 .

[46]  Kilian Stoffel,et al.  Theoretical Comparison between the Gini Index and Information Gain Criteria , 2004, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[47]  Peter Thejll,et al.  Effects of energetic solar proton events on the cyclone development in the North Atlantic , 2004 .

[48]  J. Kirkby,et al.  Cosmic Rays, Clouds, and Climate , 2002, Science.

[49]  Anders Moberg,et al.  Daily dataset of 20th‐century surface air temperature and precipitation series for the European Climate Assessment , 2002 .

[50]  B. Tinsley Influence of Solar Wind on the Global Electric Circuit, and Inferred Effects on Cloud Microphysics, Temperature, and Dynamics in the Troposphere , 2000 .

[51]  Henrik Svensmark,et al.  Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage—a missing link in solar-climate relationships , 1997 .

[52]  J. Haigh,et al.  The Impact of Solar Variability on Climate , 1996, Science.

[53]  Ajit C. Tamhane,et al.  A Comparison of Procedures for Multiple Comparisons of Means with Unequal Variances , 1979 .

[54]  R. Dickinson Solar variability and the lower atmosphere. , 1975 .

[55]  R. H. Olson,et al.  Influence of Solar Magnetic Sector Structure on Terrestrial Atmospheric Vorticity , 1974 .

[56]  W O Roberts,et al.  Solar Magnetic Sector Structure: Relation to Circulation of the Earth's Atmosphere , 1973, Science.

[57]  Darko B. Vuković,et al.  Forest fires in Portugal - case study, 18 june 2017 , 2019, Thermal Science.

[58]  M. Radovanović,et al.  Hurricane genesis modelling based on the relationship between solar activity and hurricanes , 2016, Natural Hazards.

[59]  Mital C. Shingala,et al.  Comparison of Post Hoc Tests for Unequal Variance , 2015 .

[60]  Ngoc Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Second International Conference, ACIIDS, Hue City, Vietnam, March 24-26, 2010. Proceedings, Part I , 2010, ACIIDS.

[61]  M. Radovanović,et al.  Connection between solar activity and atmospheric circulation in period 1891-2004 , 2009 .