Case Instance Generation and Refinement for Case-Based Criminal Summary Judgments in Chinese

Researchers have applied case-based reasoning to legal informatics in recent decades, yet real-world applications of case-based systems have been hampered by the need to manually create the case instances. To alleviate this problem, we propose algorithms for automatically generating and refining case instances from real-world judgment documents for criminal summary judgments. Our algorithms attempt to extract important legal information from the documents of past lawsuits to build case instances, and then refine these case instances by merging similar cases and removing relatively irrelevant information from the cases. Experimental results, obtained from applying the resulting cases to classifying real-world lawsuits, indicate that our algorithms are viable for assisting the task of building case databases for case-based legal reasoning systems.

[1]  Vincent A. W. M. M. Aleven,et al.  Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples , 1997 .

[2]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal, and procedural , 2002, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[3]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Toward adding knowledge to learning algorithms for indexing legal cases , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[4]  Steven Salzberg,et al.  A Weighted Nearest Neighbor Algorithm for Learning with Symbolic Features , 2004, Machine Learning.

[5]  Marie-Francine Moens,et al.  Abstracting of legal cases: the SALOMON experience , 1997, ICAIL '97.

[6]  Hinrich Schütze,et al.  Book Reviews: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing , 1999, CL.

[7]  James C. Lester,et al.  Automating Judicial Document Drafting: A Discourse-Based Approach , 1998, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[8]  Daniel S. Hirschberg,et al.  Algorithms for the Longest Common Subsequence Problem , 1977, JACM.

[9]  Anandeep Pannu,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to inductively reason with cases in the legal domain , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[10]  Chao-Lin Liu,et al.  Some Case-Refinement Strategies for Case-Based Criminal Summary Judgments , 2003, ISMIS.

[11]  Graham Brown CHINATAX: exploring isomorphism with chinese law , 1993, ICAIL '93.

[12]  Fiorenza Socci,et al.  A thesaurus for improving information retrieval in an integrated legal expert system , 1998, Proceedings Ninth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (Cat. No.98EX130).

[13]  Paul Thompson Automatic categorization of case law , 2001, ICAIL '01.

[14]  Rosina O. Weber Intelligent jurisprudence research: a new concept , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[16]  Uri J. Schild,et al.  Intelligent computer systems for criminal sentencing , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[17]  Chao-Lin Liu,et al.  Classification and clustering for case-based criminal summary judgments , 2003, ICAIL.

[18]  Werner Winiwarter,et al.  Exploratory analysis of concept and document spaces with connectionist networks , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[19]  Chao-Lin Liu,et al.  Ontology-based Text Summarization for Business News Articles , 2003, CATA.

[20]  Changning Huang,et al.  Dependency-based Syntactic Analysis of Chinese and Annotation of Parsed Corpus , 2000, ACL.

[21]  Jacky Legrand,et al.  A contribution to indexing in legal information retrieval , 1997, Database and Expert Systems Applications. 8th International Conference, DEXA '97. Proceedings.

[22]  Kevin D. Ashley,et al.  Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods , 2001, ICAIL '01.