A land-use regression model for estimating microenvironmental diesel exposure given multiple addresses from birth through childhood.

The Cincinnati Childhood Allergy and Air Pollution Study (CCAAPS) is a prospective birth cohort whose purpose is to determine if exposure to high levels of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) during early childhood increases the risk for developing allergic diseases. In order to estimate exposure to DEP, a land-use regression (LUR) model was developed using geographic data as independent variables and sampled levels of a marker of DEP as the dependent variable. A continuous wind direction variable was also created. The LUR model predicted 74% of the variability in sampled values with four variables: wind direction, length of bus routes within 300 m of the sample site, a measure of truck intensity within 300 m of the sampling site, and elevation. The LUR model was subsequently applied to all locations where the child had spent more than eight hours per week from through age three. A time-weighted average (TWA) microenvironmental exposure estimate was derived for four time periods: 0-6 months, 7-12 months, 13-24 months, 25-36 months. By age two, one third of the children were spending significant time at locations other than home and by 36 months, 39% of the children had changed their residential addresses. The mean cumulative DEP exposure estimate increased from age 6 to 36 months from 70 to 414 microg/m3-days. Findings indicate that using birth addresses to estimate a child's exposure may result in exposure misclassification for some children who spend a significant amount of time at a location with high exposure to DEP.

[1]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a 2001 National land-cover database for the United States , 2004 .

[2]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Estimating Long-Term Average Particulate Air Pollution Concentrations: Application of Traffic Indicators and Geographic Information Systems , 2003, Epidemiology.

[3]  Zev Ross,et al.  Nitrogen dioxide prediction in Southern California using land use regression modeling: potential for environmental health analyses , 2006, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[4]  D. Bernstein,et al.  A Comparison of Proximity and Land Use Regression Traffic Exposure Models and Wheezing in Infants , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Bert Brunekreef,et al.  Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: Elemental carbon (EC), PM2.5 mass, and absorbance , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[6]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  Spatial variations in nitrogen dioxide concentrations in an urban area , 1991 .

[7]  P. Kinney,et al.  Airborne concentrations of PM(2.5) and diesel exhaust particles on Harlem sidewalks: a community-based pilot study. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  D. Postma,et al.  Air pollution and development of asthma, allergy and infections in a birth cohort , 2007, European Respiratory Journal.

[9]  J. Schauer Evaluation of elemental carbon as a marker for diesel particulate matter , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  D. Bernstein,et al.  High prevalence of aeroallergen sensitization among infants of atopic parents. , 2006, The Journal of pediatrics.

[11]  Michael Jerrett,et al.  The use of wind fields in a land use regression model to predict air pollution concentrations for health exposure studies , 2007 .

[12]  U Gehring,et al.  Respiratory health and individual estimated exposure to traffic-related air pollutants in a cohort of young children , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[13]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Concentration gradient patterns of aerosol particles near interstate highways in the Greater Cincinnati airshed. , 2003, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[14]  S. Hu,et al.  UNMIX modeling of ambient PM(2.5) near an interstate highway in Cincinnati, OH, USA. , 2006, Atmospheric environment.

[15]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Concentration and Size Distribution of Ultrafine Particles Near a Major Highway , 2002, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  Simon Kingham,et al.  Mapping Urban Air Pollution Using GIS: A Regression-Based Approach , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  P. Biswas,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations of PM2.5 concentration and composition throughout an urban area with high freeway density—the Greater Cincinnati study , 2004 .

[18]  Dylan Keon,et al.  Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load , 2002 .

[19]  D. Bernstein,et al.  Is it traffic type, volume, or distance? Wheezing in infants living near truck and bus traffic. , 2005, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[20]  Mark S Goldberg,et al.  Assessing Spatial Variability of Ambient Nitrogen Dioxide in Montréal, Canada, with a Land-Use Regression Model , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[21]  G. Lemasters,et al.  A Review of Land-use Regression Models for Characterizing Intraurban Air Pollution Exposure , 2007, Inhalation toxicology.

[22]  José Holguín-Veras,et al.  Elemental carbon and PM(2.5 )levels in an urban community heavily impacted by truck traffic. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Application of land use regression to estimate long-term concentrations of traffic-related nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Altaf Arain,et al.  A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models , 2005, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[25]  P. Elliott,et al.  A regression-based method for mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments. , 2000, The Science of the total environment.