Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial

Objectives To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. Methods MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. Results Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (−3.28 vs −2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences. Conclusions Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects. Trial registration number NCT02332590.

[1]  M. Genovese,et al.  SAT0160 Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes after 2 Years of Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2016 .

[2]  E. Soriano,et al.  Prevalence of biologics monotherapy in a cohort of patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in daily clinical practice , 2016, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[3]  Charles King,et al.  2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2016, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[4]  V. Strand,et al.  Patient Expectations and Perceptions of Goal-setting Strategies for Disease Management in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2015, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[5]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study , 2015, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[6]  S. Wassenberg,et al.  Comparison of tocilizumab and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective analysis of 1603 patients managed in routine clinical practice , 2015, Clinical Rheumatology.

[7]  J. Kremer,et al.  Characteristics Associated with Biologic Monotherapy Use in Biologic-Naive Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a US Registry Population , 2015, Rheumatology and Therapy.

[8]  H. L. Wright,et al.  Effects of IL-6 and IL-6 blockade on neutrophil function in vitro and in vivo. , 2014, Rheumatology.

[9]  P. Emery,et al.  Biologic and oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis , 2013, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[10]  P. Emery,et al.  Tocilizumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (ADACTA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled phase 4 trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Kay,et al.  Evolution of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. , 2012, Rheumatology.

[12]  T. Huizinga,et al.  Impact of concomitant use of DMARDs on the persistence with anti-TNF therapies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register - Commentary , 2011 .

[13]  Ricardo Blanco,et al.  Tocilizumab inhibits structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate: results from the double-blind treatment phase of a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tocilizumab safety and prevention of structural joint damage at one year. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  E. Choy,et al.  The role of Interleukin 6 in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis , 2010, Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease.

[15]  D. Symmons,et al.  2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[16]  A. Silman,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis classifi cation criteria : an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative , 2010 .

[17]  John Wong,et al.  EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs , 2010, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[18]  M. Calnan,et al.  Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: The rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacologic interventions outcomes , 2010, Arthritis care & research.

[19]  Ernest Choy,et al.  Therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis: the interleukin-6 receptor , 2009, Rheumatology.

[20]  J. Kremer,et al.  Utilization Trends of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a United States Observational Cohort Study , 2009, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[21]  A Kavanaugh,et al.  Elevated liver enzyme tests among patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis treated with methotrexate and/or leflunomide , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Long-term safety of methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[23]  M. Dougados,et al.  Elaboration of the preliminary Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score: a EULAR initiative , 2008, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[24]  H. Genant,et al.  Effects of Abatacept in Patients with Methotrexate-Resistant Active Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[25]  Tomoko Matsumoto,et al.  Interleukin-6 levels in synovial fluids of patients with rheumatoid arthritis correlated with the infiltration of inflammatory cells in synovial membrane , 2006, Rheumatology International.

[26]  G. Burmester,et al.  Clinical and functional remission: even though biologics are superior to conventional DMARDs overall success rates remain low – results from RABBIT, the German biologics register , 2006, Arthritis research & therapy.

[27]  E. Keystone,et al.  Radiographic, clinical, and functional outcomes of treatment with adalimumab (a human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving concomitant methotrexate therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 52-week trial. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[28]  R. Taub Hepatoprotection via the IL-6/Stat3 pathway. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[29]  Richard W. Martin,et al.  A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  R N Maini,et al.  Infliximab and methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Trial in Rheumatoid Arthritis with Concomitant Therapy Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  G. Steiner,et al.  Cytokine production by synovial T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[32]  Fumi Hori,et al.  Serum Interleukin‐6 Level is a Sensitive Parameter of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis , 1995, Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases.

[33]  R. Chang,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1992, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[34]  F. Houssiau,et al.  Interleukin-6 in synovial fluid and serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory arthritides. , 1988, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[35]  Raveendhara R. Bannuru,et al.  American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2015 .

[36]  S SmolenJosef,et al.  EULAR (欧州リウマチ学会) 合成および疾患修飾性抗リウマチ生物学的製剤による関節リウマチ管理に関する推奨ガイドライン | 文献情報 | J-GLOBAL 科学技術総合リンクセンター , 2010 .

[37]  J. Detert,et al.  Biologics: Targets and Therapy Dovepress Video Abstract Biologic Monotherapy in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis , 2022 .