Methods to identify, study and understand End-user participation in HIT development

BackgroundExperience has shown that for new health-information-technology (HIT) to be suc-cessful clinicians must obtain positive clinical benefits as a result of its implementation and joint-ownership of the decisions made during the development process. A prerequisite for achieving both success criteria is real end-user-participation. Experience has also shown that further research into developing improved methods to collect more detailed information on social groups participating in HIT development is needed in order to support, facilitate and improve real end-user participation.MethodsA case study of an EHR planning-process in a Danish county from October 2003 until April 2006 was conducted using process-analysis. Three social groups (physicians, IT-professionals and administrators) were identified and studied in the local, present perspective. In order to understand the interactions between the three groups, the national, historic perspective was included through a literature-study. Data were collected through observations, interviews, insight gathered from documents and relevant literature.ResultsIn the local, present perspective, the administrator's strategy for the EHR planning process meant that there was no clinical workload-reduction. This was seen as one of the main barriers to the physicians to achieving real influence. In the national, historic perspective, physicians and administrators have had/have different perceptions of the purpose of the patient record and they have both struggled to influence this definition. To date, the administrators have won the battle. This explains the conditions made available for the physicians' participation in this case, which led to their role being reduced to that of clinical consultants - rather than real participants.ConclusionIn HIT-development the interests of and the balance of power between the different social groups involved are decisive in determining whether or not the end-users become real participants in the development process. Real end-user-participation is essential for the successful outcome of the process. By combining and developing existing theories and methods, this paper presents an improved method to collect more detailed information on social groups participating in HIT-development and their interaction during the development. This allows HIT management to explore new avenues during the HIT development process in order to support, facilitate and improve real end-user participation.

[1]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  Ian Robinson,et al.  User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review. , 2006, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[3]  Jennifer L. Martin,et al.  The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[4]  André Kushniruk,et al.  Who's Users? Participation and Empowerment in Socio-Technical Approaches to Health IT Developments , 2011, ITCH.

[5]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Social Carriers of Techniques for Development , 1979 .

[6]  Enrico Coiera,et al.  Health Information Management: Integrating Information and Communication Technology in Health Care Work , 2003 .

[7]  C. W. Johnson,et al.  Why did that happen? Exploring the proliferation of barely usable software in healthcare systems , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Designing Human Systems For New Technology: The Ethics Method , 1983 .

[9]  Denis Protti,et al.  What Can the American Electronic Health Record (EHR) Pioneers Tell Us about What it Takes to Be Successful? , 2002, Healthcare management forum.

[10]  John Kuada.  Culture and Technological Transformation in the South , 2003 .

[11]  R Smith,et al.  Information in practice , 1996, BMJ.

[12]  David E. Avison,et al.  Information Systems Development: Methodologies, Techniques and Tools , 1988 .

[13]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  A Regional PD Strategy for EPR Systems: Evidence-Based IT Development , 2006 .

[14]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[15]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  White Paper: Health IT Success and Failure: Recommendations from Literature and an AMIA Workshop , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[16]  Marc Berg,et al.  Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Anne Lorentzen.  Teknologi og udvikling i den nordjyske maskinindustri , 1992 .

[18]  Gilad J. Kuperman,et al.  Synthesis of Research Paper: A Consensus Statement on Considerations for a Successful CPOE Implementation , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Organizational Aspects of Health Informatics , 1995, Computers in Health Care.

[20]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Computer systems in work design--the ETHICS method : effective technical and human implementation of computer systems , 1979 .

[21]  Chris Sauer,et al.  Lessons from a failed information systems initiative: issues for complex organisations , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[22]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems for Public Sector Management Working Paper Series Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail Why Health Care Information Systems Succeed or Fail , 2022 .

[23]  A. Farrow,et al.  The representation of healthcare end users' perspectives by surrogates in healthcare decisions: a literature review. , 2009, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[24]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Participative design and the challenges of large-scale systems: extending the iterative PD approach , 2008, PDC.

[25]  Thomas G Rundall,et al.  Kaiser Permanente's experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Nancy M. Lorenzi,et al.  Review: Antecedents of the People and Organizational Aspects of Medical Informatics: Review of the Literature , 1997, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[27]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: A theoretical framework for involving users in the development process , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[28]  J. Gregory.  Sorcerer's apprentice : creating the electronic health record, re-inventing medical records and patient care , 2001 .

[29]  Anders Albrechtslund.  Introduktion til STS , 2007 .

[30]  R. Wears,et al.  Computer technology and clinical work: still waiting for Godot. , 2005, JAMA.

[31]  Kurt Jacobsen,et al.  Ve og velfærd: Læger, sundhed og samfund gennem 200 år , 2007 .

[32]  B. Kaplan,et al.  Culture counts: how institutional values affect computer use. , 2000, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[33]  M. Berg,et al.  Waiting for Godot: Episodes from the History of Patient Records , 2004 .

[34]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  Participatory IT Design: Designing for Business and Workplace Realities , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[35]  A. Edmondson.  Framing for Learning: Lessons in Successful Technology Implementation , 2003 .

[36]  V. Shalev,et al.  Barriers and success factors in health information technology: A practitioner's perspective , 2010 .

[37]  Marc Berg,et al.  Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[38]  Eva Brandt,et al.  Designing exploratory design games: a framework for participation in Participatory Design? , 2006, PDC '06.

[39]  Claus Bossen,et al.  Evaluation of a computerized problem-oriented medical record in a hospital department: Does it support daily clinical practice? , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[40]  Arie Hasman,et al.  Development and implementation of an EPR: how to encourage the user , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[41]  Sylvia Pelayo,et al.  From users involvement to users' needs understanding: A case study , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[42]  Dimitra I. Petrakaki,et al.  Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: qualitative analysis of interim results from a prospective national evaluation , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.