Impact of an error in the column hold-up time for correct adsorption isotherm determination in chromatography II. Can a wrong column porosity lead to a correct prediction of overloaded elution profiles?

The adsorption isotherm was determined for phenol in methanol/water on a C-8 stationary phase using frontal analysis in staircase mode, assuming different total column porosities, from 1 to 87%. Each set of adsorption isotherm data, with a certain column porosity, was fitted to various adsorption models and the generated parameters were used to calculate overloaded elution band profiles that were compared with experiments. It was found that the bi-Langmuir model had an optimum fit for a porosity that corresponds well with the value found experimentally. The adsorption energy distribution (AED) calculations and error analysis confirmed a bimodal energy distribution. It was also found that band profiles can be accurately predicted with a quite arbitrary chosen porosity, under prerequisite that a wrong but flexible adsorption model is chosen instead of the correct one. The latter result is very useful for quick optimizations of preparative separations where the exact value of the column porosity is not available.

[1]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Numerical estimation of adsorption energy distributions from adsorption isotherm data with the expectation-maximization method , 1993 .

[2]  Catherine A Rimmer,et al.  The measurement and meaning of void volumes in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Measurement of hold-up volumes in reverse-phase liquid chromatography Definition and comparison between static and dynamic methods. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[4]  P. Sajonz Influence of the column hold-up time measurement accuracy on the prediction of chromatographic band profiles. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  Andreas Seidel-Morgenstern,et al.  Experimental determination of single solute and competitive adsorption isotherms. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[6]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Influence of the concentration dependence of the mass transfer properties on chromatographic band profiles: II. Accuracy of the determination of isotherm data by frontal analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Torgny Fornstedt,et al.  Impact of an error in the column hold-up time for correct adsorption isotherm determination in chromatography I. Even a small error can lead to a misunderstanding of the retention mechanism. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[8]  J. Knox,et al.  Theory of solvent disturbance peaks and experimentaldetermination of thermodynamic dead-volume in column liquid chromatography , 1985 .

[9]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Comparison of methods used for the determination of void volume in reversed-phase liquid chromatography , 1982 .

[10]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Systematic errors in the measurement of adsorption isotherms by frontal analysis Impact of the choice of column hold-up volume, range and density of the data points. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  G. Guiochon,et al.  Calculation of Adsorption Energy Distributions of Silica Samples Using Nonlinear Chromatography , 1995 .

[12]  J. Frenz,et al.  Measurement of adsorption isotherms by liquid chromatography. , 1984, Journal of chromatography.

[13]  G. Desmet,et al.  Understanding and design of existing and future chromatographic support formats. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  J. Miller,et al.  Statistics for Analytical Chemistry , 1993 .