Phase III, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

PURPOSE Treatment options are limited for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS). This phase III, placebo-controlled trial evaluated CC-486 (oral azacitidine), a hypomethylating agent, in patients with International Prognostic Scoring System LR-MDS and RBC transfusion–dependent anemia and thrombocytopenia. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to CC-486 300-mg or placebo for 21 days/28-day cycle. The primary end point was RBC transfusion independence (TI). RESULTS Two hundred sixteen patients received CC-486 (n = 107) or placebo (n = 109). The median age was 74 years, median platelet count was 25 × 109/L, and absolute neutrophil count was 1.3 × 109/L. In the CC-486 and placebo arms, 31% and 11% of patients, respectively, achieved RBC-TI (P = .0002), with median durations of 11.1 and 5.0 months. Reductions of ≥ 4 RBC units were attained by 42.1% and 30.6% of patients, respectively, with median durations of 10.0 and 2.3 months, and more CC-486 patients had ≥ 1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increases from baseline (23.4% v 4.6%). Platelet hematologic improvement rate was higher with CC-486 (24.3% v 6.5%). Underpowered interim overall survival analysis showed no difference between CC-486 and placebo (median, 17.3 v 16.2 months; P = .96). Low-grade GI events were the most common adverse events in both arms. In the CC-486 and placebo arms, 90% and 73% of patients experienced a grade 3-4 adverse event. Overall death rate was similar between arms, but there was an imbalance in deaths during the first 56 days (CC-486, n = 16; placebo, n = 6), most related to infections; the median pretreatment absolute neutrophil count for the 16 CC-486 patients was 0.57 × 109/L. CONCLUSION CC-486 significantly improved RBC-TI rate and induced durable bilineage improvements in patients with LR-MDS and high-risk disease features. More early deaths occurred in the CC-486 arm, most related to infections in patients with significant pretreatment neutropenia. Further evaluation of CC-486 in MDS is needed.

[1]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  G. Garcia-Manero,et al.  Proposals for revised IWG 2018 hematological response criteria in patients with MDS included in clinical trials. , 2019, Blood.

[3]  B. Skikne,et al.  CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with pretreatment thrombocytopenia. , 2018, Leukemia research.

[4]  K. Götze,et al.  A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and safety of epoetin-α in anemic patients with low-risk MDS , 2018, Leukemia.

[5]  M. Delforge,et al.  A phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial of darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia and lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes , 2017, Leukemia.

[6]  A. Stamatoullas,et al.  Eltrombopag versus placebo for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia (EQoL-MDS): phase 1 results of a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 superiority trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Haematology.

[7]  R. Bejar Implications of molecular genetic diversity in myelodysplastic syndromes , 2017, Current opinion in hematology.

[8]  B. Skikne,et al.  CC-486 (Oral Azacitidine) in Patients with Hematological Malignancies Who Had Received Prior Treatment with Injectable Hypomethylating Agents (HMAs): Results from Phase 1/2 CC-486 Studies , 2016 .

[9]  A. Tefferi,et al.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: Contemporary review and how we treat , 2016, American journal of hematology.

[10]  B. Skikne,et al.  Efficacy and safety of extended dosing schedules of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes , 2015, Leukemia.

[11]  B. Skikne,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics with Extended Dosing of CC-486 in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  C. Jung,et al.  Platelet response during the second cycle of decitabine treatment predicts response and survival for myelodysplastic syndrome patients , 2015, Oncotarget.

[13]  D. Neuberg,et al.  TET2 mutations predict response to hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndrome patients. , 2014, Blood.

[14]  C Haferlach,et al.  Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes , 2013, Leukemia.

[15]  Y. Saunthararajah Key clinical observations after 5-azacytidine and decitabine treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes suggest practical solutions for better outcomes. , 2013, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[16]  M. Stratton,et al.  Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2013, Blood.

[17]  Luca Malcovati,et al.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2012, Blood.

[18]  M. Ardanaz,et al.  Prognostic impact of severe thrombocytopenia in low‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome , 2011, Cancer.

[19]  E. Vellenga,et al.  Platelet doubling after the first azacitidine cycle is a promising predictor for response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in the Dutch azacitidine compassionate named patient programme , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[20]  B. Skikne,et al.  Phase I study of oral azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Significance of thrombocytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes: associations and prognostic implications. , 2011, Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia.

[22]  R. Larson,et al.  Safety and efficacy of romiplostim in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and thrombocytopenia. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. , 2009, Blood.

[24]  F. Lyko,et al.  Modes of action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacytidine and decitabine , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[25]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Time-dependent prognostic scoring system for predicting survival and leukemic evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  B. Cheson,et al.  Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. , 2006, Blood.

[27]  J. Cashy,et al.  General Population and Cancer Patient Norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) , 2005, Evaluation & the health professions.

[28]  M. Essink‐bot,et al.  Quality of life measurement in patients with transfusion‐dependent myelodysplastic syndromes , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[29]  J. Issa,et al.  Changes in DNA Methylation in Neoplasia: Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Implications , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[30]  D. Cella,et al.  The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Scale: a new tool for the assessment of outcomes in cancer anemia and fatigue. , 1997, Seminars in hematology.

[31]  T Hamblin,et al.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 1997, Blood.