Pruned Adaptive Routing in the heterogeneous Internet of Things

Recent research endeavours are capitalizing on state of the art technologies to build a scalable Internet of Things (IoT). Envisioned as a technology to integrate the best of Wireless Sensor Networks and RFID systems, there is much promise for a global network of objects that are identifiable, track-able, and harmoniously informing. However, the realization of an IoT framework is hindered by many factors, the most pressing of which is attributed to the integration of these heterogeneous nodes and devices. A considerable subset of these nodes undergoes movement and dynamically enters and leaves the network backbone/topology. Routing packets and inter-nodal communication has received little attention; mainly due to the sheer reliance on the Internet as a backbone. However, spatially correlated entities in the IoT, and those which most often interact, would pose a significant overhead of communication if all intermediate packets need to be routed over distant backhauls. In remedy, we present a Pruned Adaptive IoT Routing (PAIR) protocol that selectively establishes routes of communication between IoT nodes. Since nodes in the IoT belong to different owners, we also introduce a pricing model to cater for the exchange of monetary costs by intermediate nodes to utilize their relaying resources. We also establish a cap on inter-nodal routing to dynamically utilize the Internet backbone if the source to destination distance surpasses a preset (case optimized) threshold. The PAIR routing protocol is elaborated upon, building upon the detailed system model presented in this paper. We finally present a use case to demonstrate the utility and practicality of PAIR in the heterogeneous IoT as it scales.

[1]  Artemis Moroni,et al.  Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things , 2010 .

[2]  Zhu Han,et al.  Coalitional game theory for communication networks , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Using neighbor and tag estimations for redundant reader eliminations in RFID networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[4]  Leilani Battle,et al.  Building the Internet of Things Using RFID: The RFID Ecosystem Experience , 2009, IEEE Internet Computing.

[5]  Antonio Iera,et al.  The Internet of Things: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Peter Friess,et al.  Internet of Things Strategic Research Roadmap , 2011 .

[7]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Embedded Interaction: Interacting with the Internet of Things , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[8]  Qian Zhu,et al.  IOT Gateway: BridgingWireless Sensor Networks into Internet of Things , 2010, 2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing.

[9]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  A novel cost-effective architecture and deployment strategy for integrated RFID and WSN systems , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[10]  Maurizio Tomasella,et al.  Vision and Challenges for Realising the Internet of Things , 2010 .

[11]  Wendi Heinzelman,et al.  Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences- 2000 Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Microsensor Networks , 2022 .

[12]  Amardeo Sarma,et al.  Identities in the Future Internet of Things , 2009, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[13]  Michael Afergan,et al.  Using Repeated Games to Design Incentive-Based Routing Systems , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[14]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  On designing incentive-compatible routing and forwarding protocols in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2006, Wirel. Networks.