Influence of clouds on the spectral actinic flux density in the lower troposphere (INSPECTRO): overview of the field campaigns

Ultraviolet radiation is the key factor driving tropospheric photochemistry. It is strongly modulated by clouds and aerosols. A quantitative understanding of the radiation field and its effect on photochemistry is thus only possible with a detailed knowledge of the interaction between clouds and radiation. The overall objective of the project INSPECTRO was the characterization of the three-dimensional actinic radiation field under cloudy conditions. This was achieved during two measurement campaigns in Norfolk (East Anglia, UK) and Lower Bavaria (Germany) combining space-based, aircraft and ground-based measurements as well as simulations with the one-dimensional radiation transfer model UVSPEC and the three-dimensional radiation transfer model MYSTIC. During both campaigns the spectral actinic flux density was measured at several locations at ground level and in the air by up to four different aircraft. This allows the comparison of measured and simulated actinic radiation profiles. In addition satellite data were used to complete the information of the three dimensional input data set for the simulation. A three-dimensional simulation of actinic flux density data under cloudy sky conditions requires a realistic simulation of the cloud field to be used as an input for the 3-D radiation transfer model calculations. Two different approaches were applied, to derive high- and low-resolution data sets, with a grid resolution of about 100 m and 1 km, respectively. The results of the measured and simulated radiation profiles as well as the results of the ground based measurements are presented in terms of photolysis rate profiles for ozone and nitrogen dioxide. During both campaigns all spectroradiometer systems agreed within ±10% if mandatory corrections e.g. stray light correction were applied. Stability changes of the systems were below 5% over the 4 week campaign periods and negligible over a few days. The J(O 1 D) data of the single monochromator systems can be evaluated for zenith angles less than 70°, which was satisfied by nearly all airborne measurements during both campaigns. The comparison of the airborne measurements with corresponding simulations is presented for the total, downward and upward flux during selected clear sky periods of both campaigns. The compliance between the measured (from three aircraft) and simulated downward and total flux profiles lies in the range of ±15%.

[1]  Manfred Wendisch,et al.  Reproducing cloud microphysical and irradiance measurements using three 3D cloud generators , 2007 .

[2]  E. Jäkel,et al.  A CCD Spectroradiometer for Ultraviolet Actinic Radiation Measurements , 2007 .

[3]  P. Monks,et al.  Seasonal dependence of peroxy radical concentrations at a Northern hemisphere marine boundary layer site during summer and winter: evidence for radical activity in winter , 2006 .

[4]  Neil Brough,et al.  An improved dual channel PERCA instrument for atmospheric measurements of peroxy radicals. , 2006, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[5]  Mario Blumthaler,et al.  Quality Assurance of Spectral Solar UV Measurements: Results from 25 UV Monitoring Sites in Europe, 2002 to 2004 , 2006 .

[6]  Tapani Koskela,et al.  Traveling reference spectroradiometer for routine quality assurance of spectral solar ultraviolet irradiance measurements. , 2005, Applied optics.

[7]  Arve Kylling,et al.  Spectral actinic flux in the lower troposphere: measurement and 1-D simulations for cloudless, broken cloud and overcast situations , 2005 .

[8]  Bernhard Mayer,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Technical Note: the Libradtran Software Package for Radiative Transfer Calculations – Description and Examples of Use , 2022 .

[9]  Mario Blumthaler,et al.  Direct spectral measurements with a Brewer spectroradiometer: absolute calibration and aerosol optical depth retrieval. , 2005, Applied optics.

[10]  W. Junkermann.  The actinic UV-radiation budget during the ESCOMPTE campaign 2001: results of airborne measurements with the microlight research aircraft D-MIFU , 2005 .

[11]  E. Jäkel,et al.  Airborne system for fast measurements of upwelling and downwelling spectral actinic flux densities. , 2005, Applied optics.

[12]  S. Schmidt,et al.  CLABAUTAIR: a new algorithm for retrieving three-dimensional cloud structure from airborne microphysical measurements , 2004 .

[13]  B. Mayer,et al.  Actinic flux and photolysis in water droplets: Mie calculations and geometrical optics limit , 2004 .

[14]  Airborne measurements of ground and cloud spectral albedos under low aerosol loads , 2004 .

[15]  R. Vincent,et al.  Darwin Area Wave Experiment (DAWEX) field campaign to study gravity wave generation and propagation , 2004 .

[16]  Stacey L. Hall,et al.  Attenuation of spectral actinic flux and photolysis frequencies at the surface through homogenous cloud fields , 2004 .

[17]  Hermann Mannstein,et al.  A 14‐year European Cloud Climatology from NOAA/AVHRR data in comparison to surface observations , 2004 .

[18]  A. Hofzumahaus,et al.  Measurement of atmospheric O3 → O(1D) photolysis frequencies using filterradiometry , 2004 .

[19]  P. Pilewskie,et al.  Airborne Measurements of Areal Spectral Surface Albedo over Different Sea and Land Surfaces , 2004 .

[20]  Gian Paolo Gobbi,et al.  Modeling the Aerosol Extinction versus Backscatter Relationship for Lidar Applications: Maritime and Continental Conditions , 2004 .

[21]  Gian Paolo Gobbi,et al.  The vertical distribution of aerosols, Saharan dust and cirrus clouds in Rome (Italy) in the year 2001 , 2003 .

[22]  Arve Kylling,et al.  Actinic flux determination from measurements of irradiance , 2003 .

[23]  Arve Kylling,et al.  International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Model Intercomparison (IPMMI): Spectral actinic solar flux measurements and modeling , 2003 .

[24]  Barry Lefer,et al.  Cloud impacts on UV spectral actinic flux observed during the International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and Model Intercomparison (IPMMI) , 2003 .

[25]  G. Fiocco,et al.  Tropospheric aerosols in the Mediterranean: 3. Measurements and modeling of actinic radiation profiles , 2003 .

[26]  Manfred Wendisch,et al.  Vertical distribution of spectral solar irradiance in the cloudless sky: A case study , 2003 .

[27]  K. T. Kriebel,et al.  The cloud analysis tool APOLLO: Improvements and validations , 2003 .

[28]  A. Bais,et al.  Measurements and modeling of photolysis rates during the Photochemical Activity and Ultraviolet Radiation (PAUR) II campaign , 2002 .

[29]  Arve Kylling,et al.  Solar actinic radiation (280-420 nm) in the cloud-free troposphere between ground and 12 km altitude: Measurements and model results , 2002 .

[30]  Arve Kylling,et al.  Measuring Spectral Actinic Flux and Irradiance: Experimental Results from the Actinic Flux Determination from Measurements of Irradiance (ADMIRA) Project , 2002 .

[31]  A. Ravishankara,et al.  Quantum yields for production of O(1D) in the ultraviolet photolysis of ozone: Recommendation based on evaluation of laboratory data , 2002 .

[32]  S. Madronich,et al.  Comparison of airborne measured and calculated spectral actinic flux and derived photolysis frequencies during the PEM Tropics B mission , 2002 .

[33]  Manfred Wendisch,et al.  An Airborne Spectral Albedometer with Active Horizontal Stabilization , 2001 .

[34]  Gian Paolo Gobbi,et al.  Lidar estimation of tropospheric aerosol extinction, surface area and volume: Maritime and desert-dust cases , 2001 .

[35]  M. Wendisch,et al.  Measured profiles of aerosol particle absorption and its influence on clear‐sky solar radiative forcing , 2001 .

[36]  A. Webb,et al.  Airborne spectral measurements of surface reflectivity at ultraviolet and visible wavelengths , 2000 .

[37]  Bernhard Mayer.  I3RC phase 1 results from the MYSTIC Monte Carlo model , 2000 .

[38]  J. Troe,et al.  Are Primary Quantum Yields of NO2 Photolysis at λ ≤ 398 nm Smaller than Unity? , 2000 .

[39]  Thomas Trautmann,et al.  Actinic fluxes and photodissociation coefficients in cloud fields embedded in realistic atmospheres , 1999 .

[40]  J. Slusser,et al.  On Rayleigh Optical Depth Calculations , 1999 .

[41]  A. Hofzumahaus,et al.  Solar actinic flux spectroradiometry: a technique for measuring photolysis frequencies in the atmosphere. , 1999, Applied optics.

[42]  Gunther Seckmeyer,et al.  Uncertainty of measurements of spectral solar UV irradiance , 1999 .

[43]  K. Clemitshaw,et al.  The Weybourne Atmospheric Observatory , 1999 .

[44]  Martin D. Müller,et al.  Photolysis frequency measurements using actinic flux spectroradiometry during the PEM‐Tropics mission: Instrumentation description and some results , 1999 .

[45]  C. Flamant,et al.  Urban boundary-layer height determination from lidar measurements over the paris area. , 1999, Applied optics.

[46]  A. Bais,et al.  Optical properties of tropospheric aerosols determined by lidar and spectrophotometric measurements (Photochemical Activity and Solar Ultraviolet Radiation campaign). , 1997, Applied optics.

[47]  Gunther Seckmeyer,et al.  New Entrance Optics for Solar Spectral UV Measurements , 1997 .

[48]  Actinic fluxes in broken cloud fields , 1997 .

[49]  G. Seckmeyer,et al.  Transmittance of a cloud is wavelength‐dependent in the UV‐range , 1996 .

[50]  Martin G. Schultz,et al.  Airborne measurements of the photolysis frequency of NO2 , 1996 .

[51]  A. Bais,et al.  Solar UVB measurements with the double‐ and single‐monochromator Brewer ozone spectrophotometers , 1996 .

[52]  Martin Huber,et al.  Comparing ground‐level spectrally resolved solar UV measurements using various instruments: A technique resolving effects of wavelength shift and slit width , 1995 .

[53]  A. Jenouvrier,et al.  The NO2 absorption spectrum. I: Absorption cross-sections at ambient temperature in the 300–500 nm region , 1995 .

[54]  Forrest M. Mims,et al.  Cumulus clouds and UV-B , 1994, Nature.

[55]  H. Rahman,et al.  Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model: 2. Semiempirical surface model usable with NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer data , 1993 .

[56]  J. Brion,et al.  Ozone UV spectroscopy I: Absorption cross-sections at room temperature , 1992 .

[57]  A. Thompson,et al.  Effect of chemical kinetics uncertainties on calculated constituents in a tropospheric photochemical model , 1991 .

[58]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  The role of clouds in tropospheric photochemistry , 1991 .

[59]  E. Shettle.  Models of aerosols, clouds, and precipitation for atmospheric propagation studies , 1990 .

[60]  Ulrich Platt,et al.  A photoelectric detector for the measurement of photolysis frequencies of ozone and other atmospheric molecules , 1989 .

[61]  K. Stamnes,et al.  Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. , 1988, Applied optics.

[62]  S. Madronich.  Photodissociation in the atmosphere: 1. Actinic flux and the effects of ground reflections and clouds , 1987 .

[63]  F. X. Kneizys,et al.  AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0-120km) , 1986 .

[64]  R. J. Paur,et al.  The ultraviolet cross-sections of ozone. I. The measurements. II - Results and temperature dependence , 1985 .

[65]  J. Hansen,et al.  Light scattering in planetary atmospheres , 1974 .

[66]  A. Green,et al.  Influence of clouds, haze, and smog on the middle ultraviolet reaching the ground. , 1974, Applied optics.