Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations.

To assess the histological response and the reinforcing effects of bone ingrowth within porous hydroxyapatite (HA) implants depending on pore geometry, four kinds of cylindrical-type with parallel linear pores phi50, 100, 300, 500 microm), one kind of sponge-type with irregular interconnecting pores (phi250 microm) and one cross-type with crossing linear pores (phi100 x 120 microm) of porous HA were prepared. Eighty-four rabbits were divided into six groups, and a 5 x 5 x 7 mm sized porous HA block was inserted through the medial cortical window of the proximal tibia. Histomorphological changes were examined using light and scanning electron microscopy. A biomechanical compression test was performed using material test machines. After implantation, the implants showed different histological changes depending on pore geometry. Active osteoconduction was also found in the phi50 microm sized cylindrical-type porous HA. Evidence of remodeling of new bone and bone marrow formation within porous HA was found in the larger cylindrical-types (phi300, 500 microm), and the sponge- and cross-types. The biomechanical test showed that the ultimate compressive strength increased significantly in the phi300 microm sized cylindrical-type, and in the sponge- and cross-types eight weeks after implantation. Porous HA with cylindrical pores could be a useful graft material due to its strength, osteoconductivity and the ease with which its pore geometry can be controlled.

[1]  S. Asko-Seljavaara,et al.  Compressive strength of calcium carbonate and hydroxyapatite implants after bone-marrow-induced osteogenesis. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[2]  U. Joos,et al.  Mechanisms and structure of the bond between bone and hydroxyapatite ceramics. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  S. Ertürk,et al.  Ultrastructural features of the bone response to a plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating in sheep. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  G. Daculsi,et al.  Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[5]  I. Ivanov,et al.  Inorganic phase composition of remineralisation in porous CaP ceramics. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[6]  U. Ripamonti,et al.  Geometry of porous hydroxyapatite implants influences osteogenesis in baboons (Papio ursinus). , 1996, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  A I Caplan,et al.  Repair of bone defects with marrow cells and porous ceramic. Experiments in rats. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[8]  J. Zerwekh,et al.  Porous ceramics as bone graft substitutes in long bone defects: A biomechanical, histological, and radiographic analysis , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  K. Ishihara,et al.  Adhesive bone cement containing hydroxyapatite particle as bone compatible filler. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  R. Holmes,et al.  Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes. , 1987, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[11]  H. Takita,et al.  Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. , 1997, Journal of biochemistry.

[12]  Michael Jarcho,et al.  Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Olivier Gauthier,et al.  Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics , 1997 .

[14]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Hydroxylapatite/poly(L-lactide) composites: an animal study on push-out strengths and interface histology. , 1993, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[15]  K. Lynch,et al.  Tissue response to implants of calcium phosphate ceramic in the rabbit spine. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  S F Hulbert,et al.  Tissue reaction to three ceramics of porous and non-porous structures. , 1972, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[17]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic , 1991 .

[18]  J. Le Huec,et al.  Influence of porosity on the mechanical resistance of hydroxyapatite ceramics under compressive stress. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[19]  S. Radin,et al.  Effect of bioactive ceramic composition and structure on in vitro behavior. III. Porous versus dense ceramics. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  T. Yotsuyanagi,et al.  Synthesis of antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite beads and in vitro drug release testing. , 1992, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  W. Osiris,et al.  Reconstruction of resected mandibles using a hydroxyapatite veterinary bone graft. , 1994, Biomaterials.