Cross-National Adoption of Private Food Quality Standards

Retailer initiated food quality standards are important elements to market food and agricultural products. However, farmers’ certification proceeds at an unequal speed worldwide with some countries representing a large number of certified producers and others representing very few, if any. This study aims at analysing the adoption of two private food standards, BRC Food Technical Standard and GlobalGAP, at an aggregated cross-country level using data of 2007. Negative binomial models are applied to quantify the determinants of standards’ spread at an aggregated level. The results of the econometric analysis reveal some (potential) barriers for farms and firms in developing countries to access this type of organisational innovation. Certificates of both standards seem to be issued more likely in countries with established trade relations with Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, home countries of the standards. Furthermore, larger countries and countries with better institutional quality host more certified firms. Finally, a country’s level of economic development displays a clear non-monotonic relationship to the number of certified enterprises. Although no evidence for a general exclusion of developing countries can be found, the main implication of this paper is that third-party certification for export purposes seems to reinforce already existing trade relations, potentially hampering new entrants.

[1]  Julie A. Caswell,et al.  Traceability adoption at the farm level: An empirical analysis of the Portuguese pear industry , 2009 .

[2]  R. Winkelmann.  Econometric Analysis of Count Data , 1997 .

[3]  Johan F.M. Swinnen,et al.  Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar , 2009 .

[4]  Johan F.M. Swinnen,et al.  Trade, Standards, and Poverty: Evidence from Senegal , 2006 .

[5]  J. Caswell,et al.  Standards as Barriers Versus Standards as Catalysts: Assessing the Impact of Haccp Implementation on U.S. Seafood Imports , 2009 .

[6]  Barry Eichengreen,et al.  The Role of History in Bilateral Trade Flows , 1996 .

[7]  U. Kleinwechter,et al.  The adoption of the Eurepgap Standard by Mango Exporters in Piura, Peru , 2006 .

[8]  E. Neumayer,et al.  Uneven Geographies of Organizational Practice: Explaining the Cross-National Transfer and Diffusion of ISO 9000 , 2004 .

[9]  A. Kosse,et al.  Preparatory Economic Analysis of the Value-adding Processes within Integrated Supply Chains in Food and Agriculture , 2006 .

[10]  J. Swinnen,et al.  The globalization of private standards and the agri-food system. , 2007 .

[11]  P. Correa,et al.  Technology Adoption and the Investment Climate: Firm-Level Evidence for Eastern Europe and Central Asia , 2008 .

[12]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Some Aspects of An Analytical Framework for Studying the Diffusion of Organizational Innovations , 1998 .

[13]  G. Gereffi,et al.  The governance of global value chains , 2005 .

[14]  H. Campbell.  The rise and rise of Eurep-GAP: European re(invention) of colonial food relations? , 2005 .

[15]  K. Cadoret,et al.  Organic certification and the UK market: organic imports from developing countries , 2002 .

[16]  Lawrence Busch,et al.  GLOBAL CHANGE IN AGRIFOOD GRADES AND STANDARDS: AGRIBUSINESS STRATEGIC RESPONSES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES , 1999 .

[17]  J. Swinnen.  Global supply chains, standards and the poor , 2007 .

[18]  John Humphrey,et al.  Understanding the Complexities of Private Standards in Global Agri-Food Chains as They Impact Developing Countries , 2010, The journal of development studies.

[19]  L. Fulponi,et al.  Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries , 2006 .

[20]  Gerald F. Ortmann,et al.  Adoption of ISO 9000 quality assurance standards by South African agribusiness firms , 2000 .

[21]  Emmanuel K. Yiridoe,et al.  ISO 14001 EMS Standard Registration Decisions Among Canadian Organizations , 2003 .

[22]  L. Busch,et al.  Third-Party Certification in the Global Agrifood System: An Objective or Socially Mediated Governance Mechanism? , 2008 .

[23]  Julie A. Caswell,et al.  Food safety regulation: an overview of contemporary issues , 1999 .

[24]  Lokman Zaibet,et al.  Gains from ISO certification in the UK meat sector , 1997 .

[25]  Carmen Bain,et al.  Third-party certification in the global agrifood system , 2005 .

[26]  J. Hobbs.  Public and private standards for food safety and quality: international trade implications. , 2010 .

[27]  Jeffrey A. Frankel,et al.  The Regionalization Of The World Economy , 1997 .

[28]  Raphael Kaplinsky,et al.  The Role of Standards in Global Value Chains , 2010 .

[29]  J. M. Macpherson,et al.  Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates , 2002 .

[30]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations (5. ed.) , 2003 .

[31]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004 , 2005 .

[32]  Hassan Fouayzi,et al.  Motivations of Fresh-Cut Produce Firms to Implement Quality Management Systems , 2006 .

[33]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[34]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns , 2003 .

[35]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  Governance Matters VI: Governance Indicators for 1996-2006 , 2007 .

[36]  Diego Comin,et al.  Cross-Country Technology Adoption: Making the Theories Face the Facts , 2003 .

[37]  Stefano Ponte,et al.  Greener than Thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabeling and Its Local Manifestations in South Africa , 2008 .

[38]  Joni Valkila,et al.  Impacts of Fair Trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua , 2010 .

[39]  P. Geroski.  Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[40]  S. Henson,et al.  Exploring Incentives for the Adoption of Food Safety Controls: HACCP Implementation in the U.K. Dairy Sector , 2000 .