Altitude trends in conifer leaf morphology and stable carbon isotope composition

Abstract The natural ratio of stable carbon isotopes (δ13C) was compared to leaf structural and chemical characteristics in evergreen conifers in the north-central Rockies, United States. We sought a general model that would explain variation in δ13C across altitudinal gradients. Because variation in δ13C is attributed to the shifts between supply and demand for carbon dioxide within the leaf, we measured structural and chemical variables related to supply and demand. We measured stomatal density, which is related to CO2 supply to the chloroplasts, and leaf nitrogen content, which is related to CO2 demand. Leaf mass per area was measured as an intermediate between supply and demand. Models were tested on four evergreen conifers: Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies lasiocarpa, Picea engelmannii, and Pinus contorta, which were sampled across 1800 m of altitude. We found significant variation among species in the rate of δ13C increase with altitude, ranging from 0.91‰ km–1 for A. lasiocarpa to 2.68‰ km–1 for Pinus contorta. Leaf structure and chemistry also varied with altitude: stomatal density decreased, leaf mass per area increased, but leaf nitrogen content (per unit area) was constant. The regressions on altitude were particularly robust in Pinus contorta. Variables were derived to describe the balance between supply and demand; these variables were stomata per gram of nitrogen and stomata per gram of leaf mass. Both derived variables should be positively related to internal CO2 supply and thus negatively related to δ13C. As expected, both derived variables were negatively correlated with δ13C. In fact, the regression on stomatal density per gram was the best fit in the study (r2=0.72, P<0.0001); however, the relationships were species specific. The only general relationship observed was between δ13C and LMA: δ13C (‰)=–32.972+ 0.0173×LMA (r2=0.45, P<0.0001). We conclude that species specificity of the isotopic shift indicates that evergreen conifers demonstrate varying degrees of functional plasticity across environmental gradients, while the observed convergence of δ13C with LMA suggests that internal resistance may be the key to understanding inter-specific isotopic variation across altitude.

[1]  F. Woodward,et al.  Drought—CO2 interactions in trees observations and mechanisms , 1996 .

[2]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Models of Integrated Photosynthesis of Cells and Leaves , 1989 .

[3]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  STABLE CARBON ISOTOPES AS INDICATORS OF LIMITATIONS TO FOREST GROWTH IMPOSED BY CLIMATE STRESS , 1997 .

[4]  David G. Williams,et al.  Ecophysiology of Introduced Pennisetum Setaceum on Hawaii: The Role of Phenotypic Plasticity , 1995 .

[5]  H. Jones,et al.  Plants and Microclimate. , 1985 .

[6]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination measured concurrently with gas exchange to investigate CO2 diffusion in leaves of higher plants , 1986 .

[7]  J. Grace,et al.  Variation in stomatal aperture in leaves of Avena fatua L. observed by low‐temperature scanning electron microscopy , 1989 .

[8]  Keith A. Mott,et al.  Dynamics of patchy stomatal movements, and their contribution to steady‐state and oscillating stomatal conductance calculated using gas‐exchange techniques , 1994 .

[9]  Robert D. Guy,et al.  Stable carbon isotopes as indicators of increased water use efficiency and productivity in white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) seedlings , 1996 .

[10]  F. Woodward,et al.  Experiments on the causes of altitudinal differences in the leaf nutrient contents, size and δ13C of Alchemilla alpina , 1996 .

[11]  F. Woodward,et al.  The Responses of Stomatal Density to CO2 Partial Pressure , 1988 .

[12]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Water Relations and the Maintenance of Sierran Conifers on Hydrothermally Altered Rock , 1988 .

[13]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  On the Relationship Between Carbon Isotope Discrimination and the Intercellular Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Leaves , 1982 .

[14]  F. Woodward,et al.  Evolutionary and Ecophysiological Responses of Mountain Plants to the Growing Season Environment , 1990 .

[15]  C. Körner,et al.  In situ photosynthetic responses to light, temperature and carbon dioxide in herbaceous plants from low and high altitude , 1987 .

[16]  F. Woodward,et al.  Altitudinal Trends in Leaf Nutrient Contents, Leaf Size and | delta 13 C of Alchemilla alpina , 1992 .

[17]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO2 concentrations in plants , 1995 .

[18]  G. Goldstein,et al.  Physiological and morphological variation in Metrosideros polymorpha, a dominant Hawaiian tree species, along an altitudinal gradient: the role of phenotypic plasticity , 1998, Oecologia.

[19]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Leaf carbon isotope discrimination and nitrogen content for riparian trees along elevational transects , 1997, Oecologia.

[20]  M. Kaufmann.  Evaluation of season, temperature, and water stress effects on stomata using a leaf conductance model. , 1982, Plant physiology.

[21]  R. Waring,et al.  Variation in foliar δ13C values within the crowns of Pinus radiata trees , 1994 .

[22]  S. Running,et al.  Soil Temperature Influences on Root Resistance of Pinus contorta Seedlings. , 1980, Plant physiology.

[23]  J. Marshall,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Water-Use Efficiency in Native Plants of the North-Central Rockies , 1994 .

[24]  Pauline Stenberg,et al.  Shoot structure, light interception, and distribution of nitrogen in an Abies amabilis canopy. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[25]  S. Gower,et al.  Larches: Deciduous Conifers in an Evergreen World , 1990 .

[26]  Christian Körner,et al.  Functional Morphology of Mountain Plants) , 1989 .

[27]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Resource‐Use Efficiency and Drought Tolerance In Adjacent Great Basin and Sierran Plants , 1991 .

[28]  D. Beerling,et al.  Evolutionary comparative analyses of the relationship between leaf structure and function , 1996 .

[29]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Atmospheric CO(2) and the ratio of intercellular to ambient CO(2) concentrations in plants. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[30]  R. Waring,et al.  Carbon isotope variation in Douglas-fir foliage: improving the δ13C–climate relationship , 1995 .

[31]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[32]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis , 1982 .