Effects of axial inclined guide vanes on a turbo air classifier

Abstract For a turbo air classifier, the upward axial velocity in the annular region will cause the negative influence on the stability of flow field, and it is also detrimental to material dispersion. As a result, the classification accuracy will be reduced. In order to decrease the upward axial velocity, a downward force must be introduced to offset it. According to the guiding principle of guide vanes, the axial direction of airflow will be changed when the guide vanes are inclined. In this paper an axial inclined guide vane model was designed. Four models (T-0, T-2.5, T-5, T-7.5) were established with axial inclined angles of 0°, 2.5°, 5° and 7.5°. Fluent software was used to simulate the inner flow field of different structures. The simulation results show that axial inclined guide vanes can decrease the upward axial velocity in the annular region. Especially, when the inclined angle is 2.5°, the upward axial velocity is decreased and the tangential velocity is increased. This is favorable to keep the flow field stable. At the same time the classification force field is enhanced to improve the dispersion of the powders. Discrete phase simulation results reveal that particle residence time in the annular region of structure T-2.5 is shorter than it is in the annular region of structure T-0. This can reduce the collision probability of particles and the energy cost is reduced. The partial classification efficiencies of T-2.5 are higher than that of T-0. From the numerical Tromp curves, it is observed that the cut size of T-2.5 is smaller than that of T-0. The classification accuracy of T-2.5 is 90.7%, while that of T-0 is 88.5%. That means that the classification performance is improved with the new structure. Calcium carbonate classification experiment results also show that the cut size decreases by 0.97–8.42 μm and the accuracy increases by 6%–9% for the structure T-2.5, compared to the structure T-0. Therefore, the structure T-2.5 is more favorable for classification than the structure T-0. These actual experimental results are in good agreement with the simulation results and the significance of this optimization is proved.

[1]  Hakan Benzer,et al.  Selection and mathematical modelling of high efficiency air classifiers , 2014 .

[2]  Liu Jia-xiang,et al.  Numerical simulation and measurement of three-dimensional flow field in turbo air classifier , 2009 .

[3]  Jing Han,et al.  Influence of Guide Vanes' Angle on Flow Fields of Cylinder Cage Powder Classifier , 2012 .

[4]  Jiaxiang Liu,et al.  Turbo air classifier guide vane improvement and inner flow field numerical simulation , 2012 .

[5]  M. Shapiro,et al.  Air classification of solid particles: a review , 2005 .

[6]  P. Bournot,et al.  CFD modeling and analysis of the fish-hook effect on the rotor separator's efficiency , 2014 .

[7]  Andrew J. Neely,et al.  Computational study of the flow characteristics and separation efficiency in a mini-hydrocyclone , 2012 .

[8]  Jiaxiang Liu,et al.  Correspondence analysis and establishment of evaluation model of classification performance indices for a turbo air classifier , 2014 .

[9]  Bow-yaw Wang,et al.  CFD–DEM simulation of the gas–solid flow in a cyclone separator , 2011 .

[10]  Liu Jia-xiang Effect of volute with horizontal plates on flow fields in turbo air classifiers , 2011 .

[12]  Toshihiko Shakouchi,et al.  Classification of ultra fine powder by a new pneumatic type classifier , 2003 .

[13]  Wang Juan,et al.  NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF STRONGLY SWIRLING FLOW IN CYCLONE SEPARATOR BY USING AN ADVANCED RNG κ-ε MODEL , 2010 .

[14]  Jiaxiang Liu,et al.  Study on the cut size of a turbo air classifier , 2013 .

[15]  Wolfgang Peukert,et al.  Industrial classification in a new impeller wheel classifier , 1999 .

[16]  Yuan Yu,et al.  Establishment of a prediction model for the cut size of turbo air classifiers , 2014 .

[17]  Jiaxiang Liu,et al.  Velocity measurements and flow field characteristic analyses in a turbo air classifier , 2007 .

[18]  Yongyao Luo,et al.  Numerical predictions of pressure pulses in a Francis pump turbine with misaligned guide vanes , 2014 .

[19]  Bijay K. Mishra,et al.  Mechanism of particle separation and analysis of fish-hook phenomenon in a circulating air classifier , 2012 .

[20]  Jia Xiang Liu,et al.  Flow Field Characteristic Analyses of a Turbo Air Classifier’s Rotor Cage and its Structurally Improved Counterpart , 2008 .

[21]  Magnus Evertsson,et al.  CFD simulation of a gravitational air classifier , 2012 .

[22]  Malcolm Powell,et al.  Study of flow behaviour in a three-product cyclone using computational fluid dynamics , 2006 .

[23]  Han Jin Influence of Guide Vanes Angle on Flow Fields of Cylinder Cage Powder Classifier , 2013 .