Who is to blame for crashes involving autonomous vehicles? Exploring blame attribution across the road transport system

Abstract The introduction of fully autonomous vehicles is approaching. This warrants a re-consideration of road crash liability, given drivers will have diminished control. This study, underpinned by attribution theory, investigated blame attribution to different road transport system actors following crashes involving manually driven, semi-autonomous and fully autonomous vehicles. It also examined whether outcome severity alters blame ratings. 396 participants attributed blame to five actors (vehicle driver/user, pedestrian, vehicle, manufacturer, government) in vehicle–pedestrian crash scenarios. Different and unique patterns of blame were found across actors, according to the three vehicle types. In crashes involving fully autonomous vehicles, vehicle users received low blame, while vehicle manufacturers and government were highly blamed. There was no difference in the level of blame attributed between high and low severity crashes regarding vehicle type. However, the government received more blame in high severity crashes. The findings have implications for policy and legislation surrounding crash liability. Practitioner summary: Public views relating to blame and liability in transport accidents is a vital consideration for the introduction of new technologies such as autonomous vehicles. This study demonstrates how a systems ergonomics framework can assist to identify the implications of changing public opinion on blame for future road transport systems. Abbreviation: ANOVA: analysis of variance; DAT: defensive attribution theory; IV: independent variable

[1]  Don Norman,et al.  The challenges of automation in the automobile , 2019, Ergonomics.

[2]  B P Hughes,et al.  System theory and safety models in Swedish, UK, Dutch and Australian road safety strategies. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  J. Henrich,et al.  The Moral Machine experiment , 2018, Nature.

[4]  Wendy Ju,et al.  From Trolley to Autonomous Vehicle: Perceptions of Responsibility and Moral Norms in Traffic Accidents with Self-Driving Cars , 2016 .

[5]  P. A. Hancock,et al.  Some promises in the pitfalls of automated and autonomous vehicles: A response to commentators , 2019, Ergonomics.

[6]  A. Colli.  Contextualizing Performances of Family Firms , 2012 .

[7]  Paul M Salmon,et al.  Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[9]  Martin E. P. Seligman,et al.  The attributional Style Questionnaire , 1982, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[10]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Moral Evaluations and Judgments of Responsibility , 1978 .

[11]  Alan E Stewart,et al.  Attributions of responsibility for motor vehicle crashes. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  R. Happee,et al.  A human factors perspective on automated driving , 2017 .

[13]  D. Lagnado,et al.  Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Road transport in drift? Applying contemporary systems thinking to road safety , 2012 .

[15]  M. Berk,et al.  Association between attributions of responsibility for motor vehicle crashes, depressive symptoms, and return to work. , 2014, Rehabilitation psychology.

[16]  Paul M Salmon,et al.  Sharing the responsibility for driver distraction across road transport systems: a systems approach to the management of distracted driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  J.C.F. de Winter,et al.  Pitfalls of automation: a faulty narrative? , 2019 .

[18]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  The need for a systems theory approach to road safety , 2010 .

[19]  H. Kelley.  The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[20]  K. Ask,et al.  On Being Angry and Punitive , 2011 .

[21]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  The attribution of blame , 1985 .

[22]  Sydney Gregory,et al.  Culture's consequences: international differences in work-related values , 1982 .

[23]  Paul M Salmon,et al.  Many model thinking in systems ergonomics: a case study in road safety , 2019, Ergonomics.

[24]  B Scott-Parker,et al.  The driver, the road, the rules … and the rest? A systems-based approach to young driver road safety. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Effects of actor's causal role, outcome severity, and knowledge of prior accidents upon attributions of responsibility , 1976 .

[26]  Abraham M. Rutchick,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles and the Attribution of Moral Responsibility , 2019 .

[27]  J. Krulewitz,et al.  Effects of rape victim resistance, assault outcome, and sex of observer on attributions about rape. , 1979, Journal of personality.

[28]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Effects of controllable versus uncontrollable factors on responsibility attributions: A single-subject approach. , 1979 .

[29]  Natassia Goode,et al.  Do not blame the driver: a systems analysis of the causes of road freight crashes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[30]  Michael Berk,et al.  Attributions of responsibility and recovery within a no-fault insurance compensation system. , 2014, Rehabilitation psychology.

[31]  Daniel W. Carruth,et al.  Investigating pedestrian suggestions for external features on fully autonomous vehicles: A virtual reality experiment , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[32]  Heuristics in causal reasoning and their influence on eyewitness testimony , 2007 .

[33]  W. Verwey,et al.  Gaze behaviour and electrodermal activity: Objective measures of drivers’ trust in automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[34]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  The attribution of blame : causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness , 1985 .

[35]  Sky Eurich,et al.  Quality of control takeover following disengagements in semi-automated vehicles , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[36]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[37]  Jaihyun Park,et al.  Emotions and Attributions of Legal Responsibility and Blame: A Research Review , 2006, Law and human behavior.

[38]  Paul M Salmon,et al.  The horse has bolted! Why human factors and ergonomics has to catch up with autonomous vehicles (and other advanced forms of automation) , 2019, Ergonomics.

[39]  Michael Berk,et al.  The association between attributions of responsibility for motor vehicle accidents and patient satisfaction: a study within a no-fault injury compensation system , 2015, Clinical rehabilitation.

[40]  T. Bellet,et al.  From semi to fully autonomous vehicles: New emerging risks and ethico-legal challenges for human-machine interactions , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[41]  Niraj Dawar,et al.  Attributions of blame following a product-harm crisis depend on consumers’ attachment styles , 2016 .

[42]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[43]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Models and methods for collision analysis: A comparison study based on the Uber collision with a pedestrian , 2019, Safety Science.

[44]  James L. Szalma,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[45]  E. Blanchard,et al.  Effects of Attribution of Responsibility for Motor Vehicle Accidents on Severity of PTSD Symptoms, Ways of Coping, and Recovery Over Six Months , 1999, Journal of traumatic stress.

[46]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Distributed Cognition on the road: Using EAST to explore future road transportation systems. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[47]  E. Walster,et al.  Assignment of responsibility for an accident. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  P A Hancock,et al.  Some pitfalls in the promises of automated and autonomous vehicles , 2019, Ergonomics.

[49]  Trust and the teleology of technology , 2019, Ergonomics.

[50]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[51]  P. Waterson.  Autonomous vehicles and human factors/ergonomics – A challenge but not a threat , 2019, Ergonomics.

[52]  Mica R Endsley,et al.  The limits of highly autonomous vehicles: an uncertain future , 2019, Ergonomics.

[53]  E. Walster.  'Second Guessing' Important Events , 1967 .

[54]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Defensive attribution-Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident , 1970 .