An Investigation of the Factors that Predict an Internet User's Perception of Anonymity on the Web

The growth of the Internet as a means of communication has sparked a need for researchers to investigate the issues surrounding different social behaviors associated with Internet use. Of particular interest is the importance of a user's perception of anonymity. The independent variables for the study were demographic information, social networking habits and prior negative experience. The dependent variable for this study was perception of online anonymity. Data for this analysis were taken from the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project's July 2013 Pew Internet Anonymity Survey. A binomial logistic regression analysis was performed to predict perception of anonymity on the Web. Results indicated that gender, income level, education level, social networking habits and compromised identity are significant in predicting one's perception of anonymity on the web. Age and prior negative experience were not significant predictors. Differences in technological proficiency and access to the web are two factors believed to have contributed to these results, particularly those related to demographics. The findings from this research could be used to help target demographics with the education and support needed to protect their identity on the web. This study also offers insight about who are more likely to attempt to use the web anonymously and will help further identify the patterns of behavior associated with anonymous web use. This paper calls for further studies to analyze to what extent do the opinions and experiences of friends and relatives impact an individual's perception of anonymity.

[1]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Privacy on the Web: Facts, Challenges, and Solutions , 2003, IEEE Secur. Priv..

[2]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The role of social networks in information diffusion , 2012, WWW.

[3]  Tim Mazzarol,et al.  Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives , 2008 .

[4]  GefenDavid,et al.  Gender differences in the perception and use of E-mail , 1997 .

[5]  Daniel T. Holt,et al.  Prior negative experiences: their impact on computer training outcomes , 2000, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Gary T. Marx,et al.  What's in a Name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[7]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[8]  Jeremy Clark,et al.  Usability of anonymous web browsing: an examination of Tor interfaces and deployability , 2007, SOUPS '07.

[9]  Kapil Chalil Madathil,et al.  Evaluating the usability of CAPTCHAs on a mobile device with voice and touch input , 2012 .

[10]  Mara M. Wenzler The Role of Social Networks , 2010 .

[11]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[12]  Darhl M. Pedersen,et al.  Regional Differences in Privacy Preferences , 1990 .

[13]  Kuanchin Chen,et al.  Protecting Personal Information Online: A Survey of User Privacy Concerns and Control Techniques , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Bruce Bimber Bimber Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet , 2003 .

[15]  Subhasish Dasgupta,et al.  Privacy on the Web: an Examination of User Concerns, Technology, and Implications for Business Organizations and Individuals , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[16]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Privacy in e-commerce: examining user scenarios and privacy preferences , 1999, EC '99.

[17]  Marlena R. Fraune,et al.  Employing User-Created Pictures to Enhance the Recall of System-Generated Mnemonic Phrases and the Security of Passwords , 2013 .

[18]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender* , 2006 .

[19]  David M. Neyens,et al.  An Investigation of the Informational Needs of Ovarian Cancer Patients and Their Supporters , 2013 .

[20]  Diane M Wink,et al.  Social networking sites. , 2010, Nurse educator.

[21]  Oliver Günther,et al.  Privacy in e-commerce: stated preferences vs. actual behavior , 2005, CACM.

[22]  Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin,et al.  Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[23]  Stephanie M. Reich,et al.  Online and Offline Social Networks: Use of Social Networking Sites by Emerging Adults , 2008 .

[24]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  Why do people seek anonymity on the internet?: informing policy and design , 2013, CHI.

[25]  Athman Bouguettaya,et al.  Preserving privacy in web services , 2002, WIDM '02.

[26]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers and demographics , 2006 .

[27]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..