Measuring Personality and Psychopathology

Contemporary scale construction methods focus heavily on a construct validation approach that elaborates the extent to which a measure can be said to reflect a theoretical (and hence not directly observable) construct. The construct validation approach emphasizes the interplay between the theoretical elaboration of the construct and its methodological validation. Three stages define, in general, the development of a scale using the construct validation approach. The stage of theory formulation involves an explication of the content domain of the construct, a delineation of the nature of the classification model and the linkages between constructs in the model, and a specification of the relationship of constructs to external variables, such as etiology or treatment outcome. The second stage of internal validation involves the operationalization of the constructs and examining various internal properties of the classification, such as interrater reliability, stability of measurement over occasions, internal correlation matrices, or the replicability of classification or factorial structures across different samples. The third stage of construct validation involves external validation. At this stage, links of the constructs to other variables related to etiology, course, or prediction must be tested. This process involves both convergent and discriminant validation. This chapter surveys important issues and procedures in the construction and implementation of measures of personality and psychopathology. Specific issues at each stage of scale development are discussed, and the methods of the construct validation approach are contrasted with other scale construction methods. Keywords: inventory; measurement; personality; psychometric; psychopathology; scale; test construction; test development

[1]  A. Comrey Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  P. Lees-Haley,et al.  A Fake Bad Scale on the MMPI-2 for Personal Injury Claimants , 1991, Psychological reports.

[3]  E. Helmes The Role of Social Desirability in the Assessment of Personality Constructs , 2000 .

[4]  T. Cleary TEST BIAS: PREDICTION OF GRADES OF NEGRO AND WHITE STUDENTS IN INTEGRATED COLLEGES , 1968 .

[5]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  The Signal/Noise Ratio in the Comparison of Reliability Coefficients , 1964 .

[6]  L. Cronbach Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[7]  W. Zung A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE. , 1965, Archives of general psychiatry.

[8]  R. Holden Disguise and the structured self-report assessment of psychopathology: II. A clinical replication. , 1989, Journal of clinical psychology.

[9]  J. Louks,et al.  Replicated factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory. , 1989, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[10]  L. R. Goldberg The structure of phenotypic personality traits. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[11]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .

[12]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. , 1971 .

[13]  P. Meehl,et al.  The K factor as a suppressor variable in the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. , 1946, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Social desirability scales: More substance than style. , 1983 .

[15]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[16]  L. Morey Classification of mental disorder as a collection of hypothetical constructs. , 1991, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  P. Costa,et al.  Clinical Assessment Can Benefit From Recent Advances In Personality Psychology , 1986 .

[18]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality in adulthood: a six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Empiricism and DSM-III , 1987 .

[20]  R A Steer,et al.  Dimensions of the Beck Depression Inventory-II in clinically depressed outpatients. , 1999, Journal of clinical psychology.

[21]  Paul E. Meehl,et al.  Specific Etiology and Other Forms of Strong Influence: Some Quantitative Meanings , 1977 .

[22]  J. Loevinger,et al.  The attenuation paradox in test theory. , 1954, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[24]  T. H. Holmes,et al.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. , 1967, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[25]  P. C. Smith,et al.  Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. , 1963 .

[26]  J. Mulloy,et al.  Further validation of computer-assessed response time to emotionally evocative stimuli. , 1993, Journal of personality assessment.

[27]  Differential weights in life change research: useful or irrelevant? , 1980, Psychosomatic medicine.

[28]  G. Peterson,et al.  The utility of MMPI subtle, obvious scales for detecting fake good and fake bad response sets. , 1989, Journal of clinical psychology.

[29]  G. Foulds Personality deviance and personal symptomatology , 1971, Psychological Medicine.

[30]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Strategic, method, and stylistic variance in the MMPI. , 1962, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[33]  D. Jackson Book Reviews : The Challenge of Response Sets by Jack Block. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965. Pp. x + 142. $5.00 , 1967 .

[34]  R. McCrae,et al.  Effects of two MMPI-2 validity scales on basic scale relations to external criteria. , 1998, Journal of personality assessment.

[35]  A. Rosen Differentiation of diagnostic groups by individual MMPI scales. , 1958, Journal of consulting psychology.

[36]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  D. W. Fiske Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sour sources. , 1949, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[38]  P D Retzlaff,et al.  Factor structure of the MCMI basic personality scales and common-item artifact. , 1987, Journal of personality assessment.

[39]  H A Skinner,et al.  Toward the integration of classification theory and methods. , 1981, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[40]  S Milgram,et al.  Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority , 1965 .

[41]  R. Holden,et al.  Structured psychopathological test item characteristics and validity , 1990 .

[42]  R. Miner,et al.  The empiricist and his new clothes: DSM-III in perspective. , 1986, The American journal of psychiatry.