Working memory and online syntactic processing in Alzheimer's disease: studies with auditory moving window presentation.

Twenty patients with dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) and 20 controls were tested on six tests of working memory and a test of online auditory sentence comprehension in which listening times for each phrase in the sentence, as well as the time required for an end-of-sentence plausibility judgment, were measured. The sentences differed in syntactic complexity. Patients had lower working memory scores than controls and performed more poorly on the plausibility judgments. However, patients were not more affected than controls by the syntactic complexity of a sentence in these judgments, and both groups showed similar effects of syntactic structure in the listening-time data. The increase in listening times at syntactically capacity-demanding points in complex sentences, compared with comparable points in matched simpler sentences, did not correlate with measures of working memory. The results indicate that early-stage DAT patients are not impaired in their ability to assign syntactic structure and to use it to determine aspects of sentence meaning, despite their reduced working memories. This provides evidence for a specialization within working memory for syntactic processing.

[1]  Fergus I. M. Craik,et al.  A functional account of age differences in memory , 2016 .

[2]  G. Waters,et al.  The reliability and stability of verbal working memory measures , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[3]  G. Waters,et al.  Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[4]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: Effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[5]  G. Waters,et al.  The relationship between measures of working memory and sentence comprehension in patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Why Do Alzheimer Patients Have Difficulty with Pronouns? Working Memory, Semantics, and Reference in Comprehension and Production in Alzheimer's Disease , 1999, Brain and Language.

[7]  G. Waters,et al.  Issues regarding general and domain-specific resources , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Sentence Comprehension Deficits in Alzheimer's Disease: A Comparison of Off-Line vs. On-Line Sentence Processing , 1998, Brain and Language.

[9]  E. Gibson Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[10]  David Caplan,et al.  Task Demands and Sentence Comprehension in Patients with Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type , 1998, Brain and Language.

[11]  M. Grossman,et al.  Sentence Comprehension in Alzheimer's Disease , 1998, Brain and Language.

[12]  David Swinney,et al.  Gap-Filling and End-of-Sentence Effects in Real-Time Language Processing: Implications for Modeling Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia , 1998, Brain and Language.

[13]  M. Just,et al.  Aphasic Sentence Comprehension as a Resource Deficit: A Computational Approach , 1997, Brain and Language.

[14]  G. Waters,et al.  Working Memory and On-Line Sentence Comprehension in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease , 1997, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[15]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Working Memory: A View from Neuroimaging , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  M. Daneman,et al.  Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  G. Waters,et al.  The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter (1992) , 1996, Psychological review.

[18]  G. Waters,et al.  Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path sentences , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[19]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. , 1996 .

[20]  G. Waters,et al.  The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  David Caplan,et al.  Processing capacity and sentence comprehension in patients with alzheimer's disease , 1995 .

[22]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Individual Differences and Probabilistic Constraints in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1995 .

[23]  David Caplan,et al.  Interaction of verb selectional restrictions, noun animacy and syntactic form in sentence processing , 1994 .

[24]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[25]  D. Caplan,et al.  Sentence Comprehension in Patients with Alzheimer′s Disease , 1994, Brain and Language.

[26]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[27]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  M. Just,et al.  Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  M. Just,et al.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory , 1991 .

[30]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[31]  Gloria Waters,et al.  The effects of concurrent tasks on reading: Implications for phonological recoding , 1985 .

[32]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[33]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[34]  S. Folstein,et al.  “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician , 1975 .

[35]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal Working Memory Capacity and On-Line Sentence Processing Efficiency in the Elderly , 2002 .

[36]  David Caplan,et al.  Working memory and connectionist models of parsing: A reply to MacDonald and Christiansen (2002). , 2002 .

[37]  E. Stine-Morrow,et al.  Age differences in on-line syntactic processing. , 2000, Experimental aging research.

[38]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Why study spoken language , 1994 .

[40]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[41]  David Caplan,et al.  Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory: Short-term memory and language comprehension: a critical review of the neuropsychological literature , 1990 .

[42]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  The Role of Processing Resources in Cognitive Aging , 1988 .

[43]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The Psychology of Learning and Motivation , 1974 .

[44]  G. Talland,et al.  Three estimates of the word span and their stability over the adult years. , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .