Combined Model Calibration and Spatial Aggregation

A methodology is proposed for estimating a combined transportation model that accommodates spatial aggregation. It employs maximum likelihood estimation using a joint probability function that includes destination and mode choice simultaneously. The main contribution of the paper is the incorporation of a spatial aggregation strategy to validate the method when the survey data are insufficient. By aggregating small zones into larger districts, estimation of the trip distribution parameters can be achieved with limited data, while mode choice continues to be estimated using disaggregated data. Our results demonstrate that including trip distribution in the travel decision induces variations in the utility function parameter estimators obtained for the different travel modes when only mode choice is estimated. The methodology thus corrects omission bias.

[1]  J. E. Fernández,et al.  Combined Models with Hierarchical Demand Choices: A Multi‐Objective Entropy Optimization Approach , 2008 .

[2]  D. Boyce,et al.  NETWORK EQUILIBRIUM MODELS OF URBAN LOCATION AND TRAVEL CHOICES: A RETROSPECTIVE SURVEY. IN: THE AUTOMOBILE , 1988 .

[3]  T. Abrahamsson,et al.  Formulation and Estimation of Combined Network Equilibrium Models with Applications to Stockholm , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[4]  Thomas L. Magnanti,et al.  A Combined Trip Generation, Trip Distribution, Modal Split, and Trip Assignment Model , 1988, Transp. Sci..

[5]  Norbert Oppenheim,et al.  Urban Travel Demand Modeling: From Individual Choices to General Equilibrium , 1995 .

[6]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Studies in the Economics of Transportation. , 1956 .

[7]  Tschangho John Kim,et al.  Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows , 2005 .

[8]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  A geographical solution to scale and aggregation problems in region-building, partitioning and spatial modelling , 1977 .

[9]  C. Fisk Some developments in equilibrium traffic assignment , 1980 .

[10]  Ángel Marín,et al.  Network equilibrium with combined modes: models and solution algorithms , 2005 .

[11]  J. de D. Ortúzar,et al.  Fundamentals of discrete multimodal choice modelling , 1982 .

[12]  M. Florian,et al.  A Multi-Class Multi-Mode Variable Demand Network Equilibrium Model with Hierarchical Logit Structures , 2002 .

[13]  David E. Boyce,et al.  Validation of Multiclass Urban Travel Forecasting Models Combining Origin-Destination, Mode, and Route Choices , 2003 .

[14]  A. Anas Discrete choice theory, information theory and the multinomial logit and gravity models , 1983 .

[15]  Stéphane Brice,et al.  DERIVATION OF NESTED TRANSPORT MODELS WITHIN A MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK , 1989 .

[16]  A. Anas THE ESTIMATION OF MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODELS OF JOINT LOCATION AND TRAVEL MODE CHOICE FROM AGGREGATED DATA , 1981 .

[17]  Kenneth Train,et al.  THE GOODS/LEISURE TRADEOFF AND DISAGGREGATE WORK TRIP MODE CHOICE MODELS. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1978 .

[18]  Michael Florian,et al.  Network Equilibrium Models with Combined Modes , 1994, Transp. Sci..