Characterization of Hypoxically Inducible Lactate Dehydrogenase in Maize

Oxygen deprivation induces a wide variety of genes, but the most extensively studied are those encoding enzymes of the glycolytic pathway. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, EC 1.1.1.27) activity increases up to 3.5-fold in maize (Zea mays L.) roots during several days of hypoxic induction. This increase in activity is accompanied by a decrease in in vitro enzyme stability. LDH activity in aerobic root extracts has an in vitro half-life of 240 min, decreasing to 100 min in 72-h hypoxically induced plant root extracts. The increase in enzyme activity during hypoxic induction is the result of increased protein levels, which correlate with increased transcript levels. Two ldh transcripts of 1.3 and 1.7 kb are induced, with maximum levels reached by 8 and 24 h, respectively. This suggests that the two ldh genes are differentially regulated. Treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide does not preclude ldh induction during the first few hours of hypoxic stress, suggesting that new protein synthesis may not be essential for elevation of ldh transcript levels under hypoxic conditions. The rapid and substantial increase in ldh mRNA levels under hypoxic conditions and in the presence of cycloheximide suggests that the ldh gene may be valuable in analyzing the hypoxic signal transduction pathway.

[1]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[2]  C. Gasser,et al.  Structure and expression of cytosolic cyclophilin/peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase of higher plants and production of active tomato cyclophilin in Escherichia coli. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M. Sachs,et al.  Characterization and Expression of Transcripts Induced by Oxygen Deprivation in Maize (Zea mays L.) , 1994, Plant physiology.

[4]  M. Freeling,et al.  Hypoxic stress-induced changes in ribosomes of maize seedling roots. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[5]  R. Bligny,et al.  Kinetic studies of the variations of cytoplasmic pH, nucleotide triphosphates (31P-NMR) and lactate during normoxic and anoxic transitions in maize root tips. , 1991, European journal of biochemistry.

[6]  A. Pradet,et al.  Plant metabolism under hypoxia and anoxia , 1994 .

[7]  J. Bailey-Serres,et al.  Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in oxygen-deprived roots of maize , 1995 .

[8]  J. Xia,et al.  Lactic Acid efflux as a mechanism of hypoxic acclimation of maize root tips to anoxia. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[9]  A. Rofe,et al.  Inhibition of endogenous oxalate production: biochemical considerations of the roles of glycollate oxidase and lactate dehydrogenase. , 1989, Clinical science.

[10]  A. Hanson,et al.  Induction of lactate dehydrogenase isozymes by oxygen deficit in barley root tissue. , 1986, Plant physiology.

[11]  A. Hanson,et al.  Control of Lactate Dehydrogenase, Lactate Glycolysis, and α-Amylase by O2 Deficit in Barley Aleurone Layers , 1984 .

[12]  W. Peacock,et al.  DNA sequences required for anaerobic expression of the maize alcohol dehydrogenase 1 gene. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. Ferl,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of an actin gene from Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1988, Gene.

[14]  R. Ferl,et al.  In vivo footprinting reveals unique cis-elements and different modes of hypoxic induction in maize Adh1 and Adh2. , 1991, The Plant cell.

[15]  A. Hanson,et al.  Hypoxically inducible barley lactate dehydrogenase: cDNA cloning and molecular analysis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  V. Walbot,et al.  Dependence of Ethanolic Fermentation, Cytoplasmic pH Regulation, and Viability on the Activity of Alcohol Dehydrogenase in Hypoxic Maize Root Tips. , 1989, Plant physiology.

[17]  M. Sachs,et al.  Anaerobic tolerant null: a mutant that allows Adh1 nulls to survive anaerobic treatment. , 1989, The Journal of heredity.

[18]  Edward S. Yeung,et al.  Differences in the chemical reactivity of individual molecules of an enzyme , 1995, Nature.

[19]  Q. Shen,et al.  Hormone response complex in a novel abscisic acid and cycloheximide-inducible barley gene. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[20]  A. Hanson,et al.  Metabolic Control of Anaerobic Glycolysis (Overexpression of Lactate Dehydrogenase in Transgenic Tomato Roots Supports the Davies-Roberts Hypothesis and Points to a Critical Role for Lactate Secretion , 1994, Plant physiology.

[21]  W. Crosby,et al.  Induction of alcohol dehydrogenase and lactate dehydrogenase in hypoxically induced barley. , 1989, Plant physiology.

[22]  V. Walbot,et al.  Mechanisms of cytoplasmic pH regulation in hypoxic maize root tips and its role in survival under hypoxia. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Ferl,et al.  Characterization of a maize G-box binding factor that is induced by hypoxia. , 1995, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[24]  J. Rivoal,et al.  Lactate Dehydrogenase in Oryza sativa L. Seedlings and Roots: Identification and Partial Characterization. , 1991, Plant physiology.

[25]  G. Fronza,et al.  Differences in the Anaerobic Lactate-Succinate Production and in the Changes of Cell Sap pH for Plants with High and Low Resistance to Anoxia. , 1989, Plant physiology.