Perceptions of Behavioral Consistency: Are People Aware of the Actor-Observer Effect?

Actors view behavior relevant for personality traits as more variable than observers do This study was designed to replicate this actor-observer effect (AOE) in a common-target paradigm, test whether actors, observers, or both are intuitively aware of the AOE, and examine the effects of social projection on people's awareness of the AOE Within each actor-observer pair, subjects described the actor on a series of trait adjectives and rated the consistency of relevant behavior They then predicted the other person's ratings The AOE emerged, and actors, but not observers, were aware of the effect On average, actors correctly predicted that observers rated actors' behavior as more consistent than actors themselves did Correlational analyses showed that actors and observers were equally prone to project their own ratings to their matched partners

[1]  Robyn M. Dawes,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of the Contrast Effect and Its Implications for Intergroup Communication and the Indirect Assessment of Attitude. , 1972 .

[2]  L. R. Goldberg Unconfounding situational attributions from uncertain, neutral, and ambiguous ones: A psychometric analysis of descriptions of oneself and various types of others. , 1981 .

[3]  J. Krueger,et al.  Contrast and accentuation effects in category learning. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  The actor-observer effect revisited: effects of individual differences and repeated social interactions on actor and observer attributions. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[6]  D. Funder The “trait” of ascribing traits: Individual differences in the tendency to trait ascription☆ , 1980 .

[7]  Joachim I. Krueger,et al.  The Truly False Consensus Effect: An Ineradicable and Egocentric Bias in Social Perception , 1994 .

[8]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Familiarity and differences in self- and other-representations. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  T. Blass,et al.  A longitudinal study of the actor-observer attributional effect , 1990 .

[10]  E. E. Jones Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[11]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Perceived Behavioral Consistency Underlying Trait Attributions to Oneself and Another , 1987 .

[12]  Eliot R. Smith Attributions and other inferences: Processing information about the self versus others , 1984 .

[13]  M. D. Storms,et al.  Videotape and the attribution process: reversing actors' and observers' points of view. , 1973, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  M. Frank,et al.  Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  D. Watson,et al.  The actor and the observer: How are their perceptions of causality divergent?. , 1982 .

[16]  J. Krueger,et al.  Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: inductive reasoning and social projection. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar-Based Model of Social Judgment , 1992 .

[18]  L. R. Goldberg Differential attribution of trait-descriptive terms to oneself as compared to well-liked, neutral, and disliked others: A psychometric analysis. , 1978 .

[19]  H. Kelley Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[20]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer , 1973 .

[21]  P. Salovey,et al.  Perceived distributions of the characteristics of in-group and out-group members: empirical evidence and a computer simulation. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  D T Regan,et al.  Empathy and attribution: turning observers into actors. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  S. Duval,et al.  Effects of objective self-awareness on attribution of causality , 1973 .

[24]  J. Krueger,et al.  Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. , 1993 .

[25]  J. Krueger,et al.  The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Flexible Correction Processes in Social Judgment: Correcting for Context-Induced Contrast , 1993 .

[27]  D A Prentice Familiarity and differences in self- and other-representations. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  R. Galper,et al.  Turning observers into actors: Differential causal attributions as a function of “empathy” , 1976 .

[29]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .