Weighted abundance-constrained linear spectral mixture analysis

Linear spectral mixture analysis (LSMA) has been used in a wide range of applications. It is generally implemented without constraints due to mathematical tractability. However, it has been shown that constrained LSMA can improve unconstrained LSMA, specifically in quantification when accurate estimates of abundance fractions are necessary. As constrained LSMA is considered, two constraints are generally imposed on abundance fractions, abundance sum-to-one constraint (ASC) and abundance nonnegativity constraint (ANC), referred to as abundance-constrained LSMA (AC-LSMA). A general and common approach to solving AC-LSMA is to estimate abundance fractions in the sense of least squares error (LSE) while satisfying the imposed constraints. Since the LSE resulting from each individual band in abundance estimation is not weighted in accordance with significance of bands, the effect caused by the LSE is then assumed to be uniform over all the bands, which is generally not necessarily true. This paper extends the commonly used AC-LSMA to three types of weighted AC-LSMA resulting from three different signal processing perspectives, parameter estimation, pattern classification, and orthogonal subspace projection. As demonstrated by experiments, the weighted AC-LSMA generally performs better than unweighted AC-LSMA which can be considered as a special case of our proposed weighted AC-LSMA with the weighting matrix chosen to be the identity matrix.

[1]  Yosio Edemir Shimabukuro,et al.  The least-squares mixing models to generate fraction images derived from remote sensing multispectral data , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  J. W. Boardman,et al.  Quantitative Determination Of Imaging Spectrometer Specifications Based On Spectral Mixing Models , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[3]  John B. Adams,et al.  Simple Models For Complex Natural Surfaces: A Strategy For The Hyperspectral Era Of Remote Sensing , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[4]  Jeff J. Settle,et al.  On the relationship between spectral unmixing and subspace projection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  J. Wade Davis,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2003, Technometrics.

[6]  John B. Adams,et al.  Quantitative subpixel spectral detection of targets in multispectral images. [terrestrial and planetary surfaces] , 1992 .

[7]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  A posteriori least squares orthogonal subspace projection approach to desired signature extraction and detection , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  Qian Du,et al.  A signal-decomposed and interference-annihilated approach to hyperspectral target detection , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Target signature-constrained mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral imagery , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Unsupervised constrained linear Fisher's discriminant analysis for hyperspectral image classification , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[11]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  D. Roberts,et al.  A new approach to quantifying abundances of materials in multispectral images , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[13]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fully constrained least squares linear spectral mixture analysis method for material quantification in hyperspectral imagery , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) revisited: a comprehensive study and analysis , 2005, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of subpixel target size for remotely sensed imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[16]  Paul E. Johnson,et al.  Spectral mixture modeling: A new analysis of rock and soil types at the Viking Lander 1 Site , 1986 .

[17]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Automatic spectral target recognition in hyperspectral imagery , 2003 .

[18]  Edward J. Wegman,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing , 1985 .

[19]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[20]  Mario Winter,et al.  N-FINDR: an algorithm for fast autonomous spectral end-member determination in hyperspectral data , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[21]  S. Tompkins,et al.  Optimization of endmembers for spectral mixture analysis , 1997 .

[22]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Fisher's linear spectral mixture analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[23]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[24]  E. Ashton,et al.  Algorithms for the Detection of Su b-Pixel Targets in Multispectral Imagery , 1998 .

[25]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[26]  Martin Brown,et al.  Linear spectral mixture models and support vector machines for remote sensing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[27]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[28]  Mark L. G. Althouse,et al.  Least squares subspace projection approach to mixed pixel classification for hyperspectral images , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[29]  J. Settle,et al.  Linear mixing and the estimation of ground cover proportions , 1993 .