The Effect of Releasing Tip-Supporting Structures in Short-Nose Correction

Correction of a short nose has been regarded as one of the most challenging and at times vexing procedures in rhinoplasty. One surgical option used to prolong nasal length is the freeing of the alar cartilages from adjacent structures by dividing the nasal tip supporting tissues. Five fibrous connections are known to be important in maintaining the nasal tip shape: fibrous tissues between the upper lateral and lower lateral cartilages; the lateral border of the lower lateral cartilages at the pyriform aperture; the interdormal ligament and anterior septal angle; the footplate of the medial crus and septal cartilage; and the dermocartilaginous ligament. This study was designed to determine which of the fibrous connections providing nasal tip support offer the most effect of lengthening when these structures are divided. We performed 10 open rhinoplasties on fresh cadavers, and we sequentially divided the previously mentioned tip-supporting structures, except the dermocartilaginous ligament. The mucoperichondrium of the upper lateral and septal cartilages was also elevated, in accordance with the usual order of being released in a short-nose correction procedure. We measured the distance between the anterior septal angle and tip-defining points by using calipers while the middle crura of the lower lateral cartilages were stretched with a skin hook. We found that the most effective length was gained by severing the lateral crus from the upper lateral cartilages, and moderate gain was noted from the release at the pyriform aperture and mucoperichondrium of the upper lateral cartilage. Release of other tip-defining structures was not statistically effective.

[1]  O. Zimman,et al.  A new technique for areolar reconstruction , 1980, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[2]  S. Hamra Lengthening the foreshortened nose. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  I. Pitanguy Revisiting the dermocartilaginous ligament. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  Y. Lee,et al.  Lengthening of the Postoperative Short Nose: Combined Use of a Gull-Wing Concha Composite Graft and a Rib Costochondral Dorsal Onlay Graft , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  E. Lee,et al.  Anchor epicanthoplasty combined with out-fold type double eyelidplasty for Asians: do we have to make an additional scar to correct the Asian epicanthal fold? , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  M. Beaty,et al.  Architectural deficiencies of the nose: treatment of the saddle nose and short nose deformities. , 1999, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[7]  S. Baker,et al.  Lengthening the short nose. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[8]  K. Ohmori,et al.  Reconstruction of a Short Nose by Full‐Thickness Tissue Transfer with Osteotomy , 1997, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  I. Pitanguy,et al.  The surgical importance of the dermocartilaginous ligament of the nose. , 1995, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  P. Adamson,et al.  The Nasal Hinge , 1994, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  R. Gruber Lengthening the Short Nose , 1993, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  F. Barton Acquired deformities of the nose , 1990 .

[13]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Lengthening the aesthetically short nose. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  P. Giammanco Lengthening the congenitally short nose. , 1987, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[15]  K. Harii Reconstruction of traumatic short nose with iliac bone graft and nasolabial flaps. , 1982, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.