The hydrology of the Bois‐des‐Bel peatland restoration: hydrophysical properties limiting connectivity between regenerated Sphagnum and remnant vacuum harvested peat deposit

The Bois‐des‐Bel peatland was restored in the winter of 1999; since then, an ~15–20 cm Sphagnum moss carpet has regenerated over the site, but it is currently unknown how the structure of the regenerated Sphagnum moss and cutover peat influences the hydrology of Bois‐des‐Bel. This study evaluates the hydrophysical properties of Bois‐des‐Bel, based on a combination of field and monolith experiments at a restored (RES), natural (NAT) and unrestored (UNR) site. The lowest field soil moisture in the Sphagnum moss at RES was 0.09 cm3 cm−3, while 0.20 cm3 cm−3 at NAT. These results were similar in both the monolith experiments and individual core hydraulic parameterization (i.e. soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity). The low soil moisture and relatively abundant large pores (>397 µm) in the RES Sphagnum resulted in low unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (0·23 cm day−1 at ψ = −35 cm) and high specific yield (0·45) compared with NAT Sphagnum (1·2 cm day−1 and 0·10, respectively). The abundance of large pores at RES resulted in hydrological conditions dissimilar to NAT and limited connectivity with the cutover peat, the latter being similar to UNR. To negate the implications of limited connectivity on water transfer from the cutover peat to the regenerated Sphagnum, the water table would need to fluctuate almost entirely within the regenerated Sphagnum layer. This will occur in time, as decomposition and compression cause a decrease in average pore size of the regenerated moss, thus detaining water and resulting in a higher water table. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  J. Price,et al.  Characterization of the fluxes and stores of water within newly formed Sphagnum moss cushions and their environment , 2014 .

[2]  J. Price,et al.  Ecohydrology of Sphagnum moss hummocks: mechanisms of capitula water supply and simulated effects of evaporation , 2014 .

[3]  J. Price,et al.  The hydrology of the Bois-des-Bel bog peatland restoration: 10 years post-restoration , 2013 .

[4]  L. Rochefort,et al.  A New Approach for Tracking Vegetation Change after Restoration: A Case Study with Peatlands , 2013 .

[5]  L. Rochefort,et al.  Comparing survey methods for monitoring vegetation change through time in a restored peatland , 2013, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[6]  M. Strack,et al.  Annual carbon balance of a peatland 10 yr following restoration , 2012 .

[7]  E. Karofeld,et al.  Initiation of microtopography in re‐vegetated cutover peatlands: evolution of plant species composition , 2012 .

[8]  R. Grant,et al.  Modeling the effects of hydrology on gross primary productivity and net ecosystem productivity at Mer Bleue bog , 2011 .

[9]  J. Price,et al.  The Impact of Peatland Restoration on the Site Hydrology of an Abandoned Block-Cut Bog , 2011, Wetlands.

[10]  J. Holden,et al.  Water table dynamics in undisturbed, drained and restored blanket peat , 2011 .

[11]  J. Waddington,et al.  Sphagnum moss moisture retention following the re‐vegetation of degraded peatlands , 2011 .

[12]  Hai Guo,et al.  An ozone episode in the Pearl River Delta: Field observation and model simulation , 2010 .

[13]  Sarah M. Brown,et al.  Surface vegetation controls on evapotranspiration from a sub‐humid Western Boreal Plain wetland , 2010 .

[14]  J. Waddington,et al.  Organic matter accumulation in a restored peatland: evaluating restoration success. , 2010 .

[15]  J. Waddington,et al.  Toward restoring the net carbon sink function of degraded peatlands: Short-term response in CO2 exchange to ecosystem-scale restoration , 2010 .

[16]  L. Rochefort,et al.  Peat, Water and Plant Tissue Chemistry Monitoring: A Seven-Year Case-Study in a Restored Peatland , 2010, Wetlands.

[17]  Jonathan S. Price,et al.  Physical and isotopic characterization of evaporation from Sphagnum moss , 2009 .

[18]  J. Price,et al.  Moisture controls on carbon dioxide dynamics of peat‐Sphagnum monoliths , 2009 .

[19]  R. Evans,et al.  Trade‐offs in resource allocation among moss species control decomposition in boreal peatlands , 2008 .

[20]  William L. Quinton,et al.  Peat hydraulic conductivity in cold regions and its relation to pore size and geometry , 2008 .

[21]  D. Elrick,et al.  A Method to Determine Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Living and Undecomposed Sphagnum Moss , 2008 .

[22]  S. Carey,et al.  Field and laboratory estimates of pore size properties and hydraulic characteristics for subarctic organic soils , 2007 .

[23]  Jonathan S. Price,et al.  Hydrological changes following restoration of the Bois-des-Bel Peatland, Quebec, 1999 2002 , 2006 .

[24]  J. Price,et al.  Characterization of surface storage and runoff patterns following peatland restoration, Quebec, Canada , 2006 .

[25]  S. Frolking,et al.  Ecosystem Respiration in a Cool Temperate Bog Depends on Peat Temperature But Not Water Table , 2005, Ecosystems.

[26]  R. Petrone,et al.  Surface moisture and energy exchange from a restored peatland, Québec, Canada , 2004 .

[27]  H. Daniel,et al.  Evaluation of an enclosed portable chamber to measure crop and pasture actual evapotranspiration at small scale , 2004 .

[28]  R. Petrone,et al.  Ecosystem-scale flux of CO2 from a restored vacuum harvested peatland , 2003, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[29]  J. Price Role and character of seasonal peat soil deformation on the hydrology of undisturbed and cutover peatlands , 2003 .

[30]  K. Dunham,et al.  Distillation in a boreal mossy forest floor , 2003 .

[31]  A. Heathwaite,et al.  Hydrological processes in abandoned and restored peatlands: An overview of management approaches , 2003, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[32]  Line Rochefort,et al.  North American approach to the restoration of Sphagnum dominated peatlands , 2003, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[33]  M. Girard,et al.  Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: An useful restoration tool? , 2003, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[34]  M. Thériault,et al.  The Regeneration of a Highly Disturbed Ecosystem: A Mined Peatland in Southern Québec , 2002, Ecosystems.

[35]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Feedback control of the rate of peat formation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  J. Price,et al.  Developing hydrologic thresholds for Sphagnum recolonization on an abandoned cutover bog , 2001, Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.).

[37]  C. Lavoie,et al.  Peatland restoration in southern Québec (Canada): A paleoecological perspective> , 2001 .

[38]  L. Rochefort Sphagnum—A Keystone Genus in Habitat Restoration , 2000 .

[39]  H. Rydin,et al.  Response of photosynthesis of Sphagnum species from contrasting microhabitats to tissue water content and repeated desiccation. , 1998, The New phytologist.

[40]  J. Price,et al.  Energy and moisture considerations on cutover peatlands: surface microtopography, mulch cover and Sphagnum regeneration , 1998 .

[41]  Jukka Turunen,et al.  Carbon accumulation in peatland , 1998 .

[42]  J. Price,et al.  The effects of matrix diffusion on solute transport and retardation in undisturbed peat in laboratory columns , 1997 .

[43]  J. Price,et al.  Rewetting of a cutover peatland: Hydrologic assessment , 1997, Wetlands.

[44]  A. Baird FIELD ESTIMATION OF MACROPORE FUNCTIONING AND SURFACE HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY IN A FEN PEAT , 1997 .

[45]  L. Rochefort,et al.  Sphagnum regeneration on bare peat surfaces : field and greenhouse experiments , 1996 .

[46]  T. Dawson Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions , 1993, Oecologia.

[47]  Jean Caron,et al.  In situ determination of the water desorption characteristics of peat substrates , 1993 .

[48]  E. Youngs,et al.  Modelling water‐table movement in flat low‐lying lands , 1989 .

[49]  H. Rydin Effect of water level on desiccation of Sphagnum in relation to surrounding Sphagna , 1985 .

[50]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[51]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  The Limits to Peat Bog Growth , 1984 .

[52]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum and peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[53]  A. P. Annan,et al.  Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines , 1980 .

[54]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[55]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  THE GROWTH OF SPHAGNUM: SOME EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENT , 1973 .

[56]  D. Boelter HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF PEATS , 1965 .

[57]  Hydrology , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[58]  J. Silvola,et al.  Water content and photosynthesis in the peat mosses Sphagnum fuscum and S. angustifolium , 1984 .