Coordination geometry of nonbonded residues in globular proteins.

BACKGROUND Two opposite views have been advanced for the packing of sidechains in globular proteins. The first is the jigsaw puzzle model, in which the complementarity of size and shape is essential. The second, the nuts-and-bolts model, suggests that constraints induced by steric complementarity or pairwise specificity have little influence. Here, the angular distributions of sidechains around amino acids of different types are analyzed, in order to capture the preferred (if any) coordination loci in the neighborhood of a given type of amino acid. RESULTS Some residue pairs select specific coordination states with probabilities about ten times higher than expected for random distributions. This selectivity becomes more pronounced at closer separations leading to an effective free energy of stabilization as large as -2 RT for some sidechain pairs. A list of the most probable coordination sites around each residue type is presented, along with their statistical weights. CONCLUSIONS These data provide guidance as to how to pack selectively the nonbonded sidechains in the neighborhood of a central residue for computer generation of unknown protein structures.

[1]  B. Matthews,et al.  Studies on protein stability with T4 lysozyme. , 1995, Advances in protein chemistry.

[2]  G. Rose,et al.  The protein-folding problem: the native fold determines packing, but does packing determine the native fold? , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Replacements in a conserved leucine cluster in the hydrophobic heme pocket of cytochrome c , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[4]  R. Rappuoli,et al.  Mutation of a buried residue causes loss of activity but no conformational change in the heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[5]  B. Matthews,et al.  Structural and genetic analysis of protein stability. , 1993, Annual review of biochemistry.

[6]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[7]  A. Lesk,et al.  Determinants of a protein fold. Unique features of the globin amino acid sequences. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  G J Barton,et al.  Structural features can be unconserved in proteins with similar folds. An analysis of side-chain to side-chain contacts secondary structure and accessibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  A. Fersht,et al.  Mapping the transition state and pathway of protein folding by protein engineering , 1989, Nature.

[11]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  A. Sarai,et al.  The cavity in the hydrophobic core of Myb DNA-binding domain is reserved for DNA recognition and trans-activation , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[13]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Structure-derived potentials and protein simulations. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[14]  M Gerstein,et al.  Volume changes on protein folding. , 1994, Structure.

[15]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[17]  K A Dill,et al.  Side‐chain entropy and packing in proteins , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  B. Matthews,et al.  Genetic and structural analysis of the protein stability problem. , 1987, Biochemistry.

[19]  W. Lim,et al.  Structural and energetic consequences of disruptive mutations in a protein core. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[20]  P. S. Kim,et al.  A switch between two-, three-, and four-stranded coiled coils in GCN4 leucine zipper mutants. , 1993, Science.

[21]  C. Sander,et al.  Quality control of protein models : directional atomic contact analysis , 1993 .

[22]  P. S. Kim,et al.  A buried polar interaction imparts structural uniqueness in a designed heterodimeric coiled coil. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[23]  J M Thornton,et al.  SIRIUS. An automated method for the analysis of the preferred packing arrangements between protein groups. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  W. Lim,et al.  The role of internal packing interactions in determining the structure and stability of a protein. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  F M Richards,et al.  An analysis of packing in the protein folding problem , 1993, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[26]  J. Thornton,et al.  Atlas of protein side-chain interactions , 1992 .

[27]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[28]  T M Handel,et al.  Metal ion-dependent modulation of the dynamics of a designed protein. , 1993, Science.