Radial and non-radial decompositions of Luenberger productivity indicator with an illustrative application

Viewing slacks as one possible source of inefficiency, and that inputs have differential importance in the production process, this paper develops, based on the directional Russell measure of inefficiency, the non-radial Luenberger indicator. This indicator is then shown as the sum of the individual input-specific Luenberger indicators. The Luenberger indicator and its various input-specific indicators are also then shown as the composite measure of efficiency change and technical change. This decomposition enables the researcher to empirically examine the contributions of each factor input towards the productivity change and its components--efficiency change and technical change. Our proposed decomposition scheme is then empirically illustrated to analyze the eco-productivity performance behavior of the 22 OECD countries during the period 1995-2004. Our results indicate that first, the productivity change estimates yielded from the non-radial Luenberger indicator are different from those yielded from its radial counterpart, when slacks are present; second, most of these countries are found experiencing productivity growth due to technical progress alone; and finally, as regards the order of input-specific contributions towards productivity growth, capital contributes the most, followed by savings in emissions and labor, respectively.

[1]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[2]  W. Briec A Graph-Type Extension of Farrell Technical Efficiency Measure , 1997 .

[3]  Walter Briec,et al.  An Extended Fare-Lovell Technical Efficiency Measure , 2000 .

[4]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[5]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Scale, Indivisibilities and Production Function in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2003 .

[6]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Osman Zaim,et al.  Productivity growth in OECD countries: A comparison with Malmquist indices , 2005 .

[8]  Biresh K. Sahoo A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and frontier translog production function for estimating returns to scale and efficiencies , 1999, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[9]  Christophe Kamps New Estimates of Government Net Capital Stocks for 22 OECD Countries 1960-2001 , 2004 .

[10]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[11]  W. Briec,et al.  Luenberger and Malmquist Productivity Indices: Theoretical Comparisons and Empirical Illustration , 2003 .

[12]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Environmental Performance : an Index Number Approach , 2004 .

[13]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[15]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN APEC COUNTRIES , 1996 .

[16]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  A. Hailu,et al.  Non‐Parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry , 2001 .

[18]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  ECO-EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANTS: AN EXTENSION OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[19]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries , 2001 .

[20]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  Estimation of the shadow prices of pollutants with production/environment inefficiency taken into account: a nonparametric directional distance function approach. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[21]  William L. Weber,et al.  A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency , 2009 .

[22]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[23]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Infeasibility and Directional Distance Functions with Application to the Determinateness of the Luenberger Productivity Indicator , 2009 .

[24]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  A DEA Estimation of a Lower Bound for Firms' Allocative Efficiency Without Information on Price Data , 2009 .

[25]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[26]  Hervé Leleu,et al.  Assessing Performance of French Intensive Care Units: A Directional Distance Function Approach at the Patient Level , 2009 .

[27]  Kristiaan Kerstens,et al.  Temporal technical and profit efficiency measurement: Definitions, duality and aggregation results , 2006 .

[28]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .