Integrated System-of-Systems Synthesis

This paper defines a system of systems as an assemblage of components organized in three levels, each level featuring both analysis and optimization. The choice of only three levels is deliberate, based on examination of the nature of a system of systems, a sample of references, and the range of potential applications. The solution methodology introduced in the paper derives as an extension of an existing bilevel integrated system synthesis method for which an application and implementation experience, as well as rigorous proof of correctness, are available. The new method, called trilevel integrated system synthesis, addresses the engineering practice requirements discussed in the paper. It builds on the formal representation of the system-of-systems coupling data known as the data dependency matrix, on the use of surrogate models, and on a recursive similarity of the data coupling among the systems in a system of systems and among the components within the system. The paper defines three variants of trilevel integrated system synthesis and identifies one of the three for implementation by the criteria of computational cost and engineering practicality. The closing discussion points out that because of extraordinary cost development and doubtful utility of simplified test cases, a system-of-systems optimization method ought to be developed in conjunction with a real, full-scale, application.

[1]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Methodology for Examining the Simultaneous Impact of Requirements, Vehicle Characteristics, and Technologies on Military Aircraft Design , 2000 .

[2]  John R. Olds,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimization Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle , 2006 .

[3]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Supersonic Business Jet Design Through Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1999 .

[4]  Daniel DeLaurentis,et al.  Abstraction and Modeling Hypothesis for Future Transportation Architectures , 2003 .

[5]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  A Parallel Trade Study Architecture for Design Optimization of Complex Systems , 2005 .

[6]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Comparing problem formulations for coupled sets of components , 2009 .

[7]  Douglas O. Stanley A space transportation architecture for the future , 2000 .

[8]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Exploration Systems Architecture Study: Overview of Architecture and Mission Operations Approach , 2006 .

[9]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Technology Engineering: The Concurrent Development of Space Transportation Systems and Technologies , 2003 .

[10]  Eric J. Miller,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING: A DECISION-ORIENTED APPROACH , 1984 .

[11]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Bilevel Integrated System Synthesis for Concurrent and Distributed Processing , 2002 .

[12]  J. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Imparting desired attributes in structural design by means of multi-objective optimization , 2005 .

[13]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Technology Engineering: The Concurrent Development of Space Transportation Systems and Technology , 2010 .

[14]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization - Survey of recent developments , 1996 .

[15]  Daniel DeLaurentis,et al.  A System-of-Systems Perspective for Public Policy Decisions , 2004 .

[16]  John R. Olds,et al.  Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Optimazation (MDO) Techniques Applied to a Reusable Launch Vehicle , 2005 .

[17]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF COUPLED SYSTEMS: A CRITICAL OVERVIEW OF APPROACHES , 1994 .

[18]  Jeremy S. Agte,et al.  Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis , 1998 .

[19]  Jaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski,et al.  A Web Centric Architecture for Deploying Multi-Disciplinary Engineering Design Processes , 2004 .