A study of the atmospheric dispersion of a high release of krypton-85 above a complex coastal terrain, comparison with the predictions of Gaussian models (Briggs, Doury, ADMS4).

Atmospheric releases of krypton-85, from the nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at the AREVA NC facility at La Hague (France), were used to test Gaussian models of dispersion. In 2001-2002, the French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN) studied the atmospheric dispersion of 15 releases, using krypton-85 as a tracer for plumes emitted from two 100-m-high stacks. Krypton-85 is a chemically inert radionuclide. Krypton-85 air concentration measurements were performed on the ground in the downwind direction, at distances between 0.36 and 3.3 km from the release, by neutral or slightly unstable atmospheric conditions. The standard deviation for the horizontal dispersion of the plume and the Atmospheric Transfer Coefficient (ATC) were determined from these measurements. The experimental results were compared with calculations using first generation (Doury, Briggs) and second generation (ADMS 4.0) Gaussian models. The ADMS 4.0 model was used in two configurations; one takes account of the effect of the built-up area, and the other the effect of the roughness of the surface on the plume dispersion. Only the Briggs model correctly reproduced the measured values for the width of the plume, whereas the ADMS 4.0 model overestimated it and the Doury model underestimated it. The agreement of the models with measured values of the ATC varied according to distance from the release point. For distances less than 2 km from the release point, the ADMS 4.0 model achieved the best agreement between model and measurement; beyond this distance, the best agreement was achieved by the Briggs and Doury models.

[1]  F. A. Gifford,et al.  Turbulent diffusion-typing schemes: a review , 1976 .

[2]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  FLACS CFD air quality model performance evaluation with Kit Fox, MUST, Prairie Grass, and EMU observations , 2004 .

[3]  S. B. Carpenter,et al.  Principal Plume Dispersion Models: TVA Power Plants , 1971 .

[4]  F. B. Smith,et al.  UK-ADMS: A new approach to modelling dispersion in the earth's atmospheric boundary layer , 1994 .

[5]  Particle Fallout and Dispersion in the Atmosphere , 1965 .

[6]  J. Weil,et al.  Updating Applied Diffusion Models , 1985 .

[7]  G. Briggs,et al.  Analytical Parameterizations of Diffusion: The Convective Boundary Layer , 1985 .

[8]  D. Thomson,et al.  Validation of a Lagrangian model plume rise scheme using the Kincaid data set , 2002 .

[9]  R. Singh,et al.  Assimilative capacity and dispersion of pollutants due to industrial sources in Visakhapatnam bowl area , 2004 .

[10]  Alan Robins,et al.  Development and evaluation of the ADMS building effects module , 2001 .

[11]  J. C. R. Hunt,et al.  Turbulent Diffusion from Sources in Complex Flows , 1985 .

[12]  S. Hanna,et al.  Air quality model performance evaluation , 2004 .

[13]  J. Hunt,et al.  Turbulent wind flow over a low hill , 1975 .

[14]  R. G. Lamb.  Diffusion in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1984 .

[15]  J. Davies,et al.  Hazardous gas model evaluation with field observations , 1995 .

[16]  Duane A. Haugen,et al.  PROJECT PRAIRIE GRASS. A FIELD PROGRAM IN DIFFUSION. VOLUME 3 , 1959 .

[17]  I. A. Singer,et al.  Atmospheric dispersion at Brookhaven National Laboratory. , 1966, Air and water pollution.

[18]  M. Barad,et al.  PROJECT PRAIRIE GRASS, A FIELD PROGRAM IN DIFFUSION. VOLUME II , 1958 .