Determination of the sedimentation coefficient distribution by least-squares boundary modeling.

A new method is presented for the calculation of apparent sedimentation coefficient distributions g*(s) for the size-distribution analysis of polymers in sedimentation velocity experiments. Direct linear least-squares boundary modeling by a superposition of sedimentation profiles of ideal nondiffusing particles is employed. It can be combined with algebraic noise decomposition techniques for the application to interference optical ultracentrifuge data at low loading concentrations with significant systematic noise components. Because of the use of direct boundary modeling, residuals are available for assessment of the quality of the fits and the consistency of the g*(s) distribution with the experimental data. The method can be combined with regularization techniques based on F statistics, such as used in the program CONTIN, or alternatively, the increment of s values can be adjusted empirically. The method is simple, has advantageous statistical properties, and reveals precise sedimentation coefficients. The new least-squares ls-g*(s) exhibits a very high robustness and resolution if data acquired over a large time interval are analyzed. This can result in a high resolution for large particles, and for samples with a high degree of heterogeneity. Because the method does not require a high frequency of scans, it can also be easily used in experiments with the absorbance optical scanning system. Published 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  R. Signer,et al.  Ultrazentrifugale Polydispersitätsbestimmungen an hochpolymeren Stoffen. 95. Mitteilung über hochpolymere Verbindungen , 1934 .

[2]  H. Fujita Mathematical theory of sedimentation analysis , 1962 .

[3]  J. Vinograd,et al.  Band centrifugation of macromolecules in self‐generating density gradients. II. Sedimentation and diffusion of macromolecules in bands , 1966 .

[4]  B Demeler,et al.  Determination of molecular parameters by fitting sedimentation data to finite-element solutions of the Lamm equation. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[5]  T. Laue,et al.  Modern Analytical Ultracentrifugation , 1994, Emerging Biochemical and Biophysical Techniques.

[6]  W. Stafford,et al.  Boundary analysis in sedimentation transport experiments: a procedure for obtaining sedimentation coefficient distributions using the time derivative of the concentration profile. , 1992, Analytical biochemistry.

[7]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[8]  S. Provencher A constrained regularization method for inverting data represented by linear algebraic or integral equations , 1982 .

[9]  H. K. Schachman Ultracentrifugation in biochemistry , 1959 .

[10]  D. Millar,et al.  Rapid determination of molar mass in modified Archibald experiments using direct fitting of the Lamm equation. , 1998, Analytical biochemistry.

[11]  W. B. Bridgman Some Physical Chemical Characteristics of Glycogen , 1942 .

[12]  W. Maechtle,et al.  High-resolution, submicron particle size distribution analysis using gravitational-sweep sedimentation. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[13]  J. Claverie,et al.  Sedimentation of generalized systems of interacting particles. I. Solution of systems of complete Lamm equations , 1975, Biopolymers.

[14]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  Boundary analysis of sedimentation‐velocity experiments with monodisperse and paucidisperse solutes , 1978 .

[15]  J. Philo An improved function for fitting sedimentation velocity data for low-molecular-weight solutes. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[16]  P. Schuck Sedimentation analysis of noninteracting and self-associating solutes using numerical solutions to the Lamm equation. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[17]  J. Philo,et al.  A method for directly fitting the time derivative of sedimentation velocity data and an alternative algorithm for calculating sedimentation coefficient distribution functions. , 2000, Analytical biochemistry.

[18]  C. MacPhee,et al.  Determination of sedimentation coefficients for small peptides. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[19]  P. Schuck,et al.  Direct sedimentation analysis of interference optical data in analytical ultracentrifugation. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[20]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  BOUNDARY SPREADING IN SEDIMENTATION VELOCITY EXPERIMENTS , 1950 .

[21]  P. Schuck,et al.  Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and lamm equation modeling. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[22]  S. N. Timasheff,et al.  Magnesium-induced self-association of calf brain tubulin. I. Stoichiometry. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[23]  T. M. Schuster,et al.  New revolutions in the evolution of analytical ultracentrifugation. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  J. Crank,et al.  A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type , 1947 .

[25]  G. Rivas,et al.  Characterization of heterologous protein-protein interactions using analytical ultracentrifugation. , 1999, Methods.

[26]  W. Stafford Boundary analysis in sedimentation velocity experiments. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  Stafford Sedimentation velocity spins a new weave for an old fabric. , 1997, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[28]  David L. Phillips,et al.  A Technique for the Numerical Solution of Certain Integral Equations of the First Kind , 1962, JACM.

[29]  M. Straume,et al.  Comments on the Analysis of Sedimentation Equilibrium Experiments , 1994 .

[30]  J. Behlke,et al.  Molecular mass determination by sedimentation velocity experiments and direct fitting of the concentration profiles. , 1997, Biophysical journal.