The Rise of Population Genomic Screening: Characteristics of Current Programs and the Need for Evidence Regarding Optimal Implementation

Purpose: Advances in clinical genomic sequencing capabilities, including reduced costs and knowledge gains, have bolstered the consideration of genomic screening in healthy adult populations. Yet, little is known about the existing landscape of genomic screening programs in the United States. It can be difficult to find information on current implementation efforts and best practices, particularly in light of critical questions about equity, cost, and benefit. Methods: In 2020, we searched publicly available information on the Internet and the scientific literature to identify programs and collect information, including: setting, program funding, targeted population, test offered, and patient cost. Program representatives were contacted throughout 2020 and 2021 to clarify, update, and supplement the publicly available information. Results: Twelve programs were identified. Information was available on key program features, such as setting, genes tested, and target populations. Data on costs, outcomes, or long-term sustainability plans were not always available. Most programs offered testing at no or significantly reduced cost due to generous pilot funding, although the sustainability of these programs remains unknown. Gene testing lists were diverse, ranging from 11 genes (CDC tier 1 genes) to 59 genes (ACMG secondary findings list v.2) to broad exome and genome sequencing. This diversity presents challenges for harmonized data collection and assessment of program outcomes. Conclusions: Early programs are exploring the logistics and utility of population genomic screening in various settings. Coordinated efforts are needed to take advantage of data collected about uptake, infrastructure, and intervention outcomes to inform future research, evaluation, and program development.

[1]  Lora J. H. Bean,et al.  DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) , 2021, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  D. L. Doyle,et al.  DNA-based screening and population health: a points to consider statement for programs and sponsoring organizations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) , 2021, Genetics in Medicine.

[3]  R. Green,et al.  Precision Population Medicine in Primary Care: The Sanford Chip Experience , 2021, Frontiers in Genetics.

[4]  M. Winget,et al.  Implementation outcomes of Humanwide: integrated precision health in team-based family practice primary care , 2021, BMC Family Practice.

[5]  G. Barsh,et al.  A state-based approach to genomics for rare disease and population screening , 2020, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  A. Slonim,et al.  Population genetic screening efficiently identifies carriers of autosomal dominant diseases , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[7]  M. Khoury,et al.  DNA-Based Population Screening: Potential Suitability and Important Knowledge Gaps. , 2019, JAMA.

[8]  H. Kirchner,et al.  Patient assessment of chatbots for the scalable delivery of genetic counseling , 2019, Journal of genetic counseling.

[9]  D. L. Doyle,et al.  A Proposed Approach for Implementing Genomics-Based Screening Programs for Healthy Adults , 2018, NAM Perspectives.

[10]  J. Berg,et al.  Too much of a good thing? Overdiagnosis, or overestimating risk in preventive genomic screening. , 2018, Personalized medicine.

[11]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  A collaborative translational research framework for evaluating and implementing the appropriate use of human genome sequencing to improve health , 2018, PLoS medicine.

[12]  K. Goddard,et al.  Returning negative results to individuals in a genomic screening program: Lessons learned , 2018, Genetics in Medicine.

[13]  G. Henderson,et al.  Age and Perceived Risks and Benefits of Preventive Genomic Screening , 2017, Genetics in Medicine.

[14]  D. Ledbetter,et al.  The Geisinger MyCode Community Health Initiative: an electronic health record-linked biobank for Precision Medicine research , 2015, Genetics in Medicine.

[15]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Ruthann Richter,et al.  Stanford Medicine , 2015 .

[17]  M. Zavon Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. , 1969 .