Governance Structures for Open Innovation: A Preliminary Framework

This research-in-progress paper presents a preliminary framework of four open innovation governance structures. The study seeks to describe four distinct ways in which firms utilize hierarchical relationships, organizational intermediaries, and the market system to supply and acquire intellectual property and/or innovation capabilities from sources external to the firm. This paper reports on phase one of the study, which involved an analysis of six open innovation exemplars based on public data. This phase of the study reveals that governance structures for open innovation can be categorized based on whether they (1) are mediated or direct or (2) seek to acquire intellectual property or innovation capability. We analyze the differences in four governance structures along seven dimensions, and reveal the importance of knowledge dispersion and uncertainty to the use of open innovation hierarchies, brokerages, and markets. The paper concludes by examining the implications of the findings and outlining the next phase of the study.

[1]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[2]  R. Coase.  The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[3]  Myriam Cloodt,et al.  Open innovation in value networks , 2006 .

[4]  O. Williamson.  The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes , 1981 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[6]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[7]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  London's Big Bang: A Case Study of Information Technology, Competitive Impact, and Organizational Change , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  O. Williamson.  Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives , 1994 .

[9]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[10]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Impacts of the Electronic Marketplace on Transaction Cost and Market Structure , 1996, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[11]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[12]  N. Sakkab,et al.  Connect and Develop : Inside Procter & Gamble's New Model for Innovation , 2006 .

[13]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[14]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[15]  B. Anderson,et al.  Sociological theories in progress , 1966 .

[16]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[17]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[18]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[19]  Zvi Bodie,et al.  Essentials of Investments , 1992 .

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[21]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[22]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[23]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers , 1995 .

[24]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[25]  Robert Motzek.  Motivation in Open Innovation , 2007 .

[26]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[27]  John Leslie King,et al.  A Representational Scheme for Analyzing Information Technology and Organizational Dependency , 2002, MIS Q..

[28]  A. Madill,et al.  Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[29]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Computerized Loan Origination Systems: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis , 1994, MIS Q..

[30]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[31]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Business models and market mechanisms: evaluating efficiencies in consumer electronic markets , 2003, DATB.

[32]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Information Technology and Industrial Cooperation: The Changing Economics of Coordination and Ownership , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  J. Oxley.  Institutional environment and the mechanisms of governance: the impact of intellectual property protection on the structure of inter-firm alliances , 1999 .

[34]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[35]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[36]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Exploring analyst-client communication: using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering , 1997 .

[37]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[38]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[39]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Joe Tidd,et al.  From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence:Measuring Technological, Market and Organisational Innovation , 2000 .

[41]  J. K. Benson.  The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy , 1975 .

[42]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Building an inductive theory of collaboration in virtual teams: an adapted grounded theory approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[43]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .