Magnetic resonance imaging: Recent research on the biological im-pacts of static magnetic and high-frequency electromagnetic fields

Problem: in recent years, new studies have been published on biological effects of strong static magnetic fields and on thermal effects of high-frequency electromagnetic fields as used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Many of these studies have not yet been incorporated into current safety recommendations. Method: scientific publications from 2010 onwards on the biological effects of static and electromagnetic fields of MRI were searched and evaluated. Results: new studies confirm older work that has already described effects of static magnetic fields on sensory organs and the central nervous system accompanied by sensory perception. A new result is the direct effect of Lorentz forces on ionic currents in the semicircular canals of the vestibular organ. Recent studies on thermal effects of radiofrequency fields focused on the development of anatomically realistic body models and more accurate simulation of exposure scenarios. Recommendation for practice: strong static magnetic fields can cause unpleasant perceptions, especially dizziness. In addition, they can impair the performance of the medical personnel and thus potentially endanger patient safety. As a precaution, medical personnel should move slowly in the field gradient. High-frequency electromagnetic fields cause tissues and organs to heat up in patients. This must be taken into account in particular for patients with impaired thermoregulation as well as for pregnant women and newborns; exposure in these cases must be kept as low as possible. excitation and preparation of the spin system or occurring during the movement of persons in spatially inhomogeneous static magnetic fields, always induces an alternating electric field. The electric field strength is proportional to the rate of change over time 𝑑 The induced electric field in turn leads to electric currents in conductive tissues. Due to this Effect, radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields cause energy absorption in tissue. The spatial distribution of energy absorption in the body depends strongly on the size, orientation, and internal tissue structure of the exposed body section as well as the frequency of the RF field. Theoretical and experimental studies show that absorption is maximal when the wavelength of the RF field corresponds to typical magnitudes of the body. Unfortunately, the wavelengths of the RF fields used in MRI are exactly in this resonance range. The energy absorbed in the tissue per unit mass and time is called the specific absorption rate (SAR in W/kg). It increases approximately with the square of the magnetic flux density B 0 of the static magnetic field, so that RF absorption is a safety-relevant Effect that must be carefully considered in high- and very-high-field MR systems. With increasing flux density B 0 , the wavelength of the RF field also decreases, so that local minima and maxima of the field distribution form in the body, which can lead not only to inhomogeneous RF excitation (i.e., varying pulse angles) but also to local SAR hotspots. So-called RF shimming is used to try to minimize these effects technically. The essential biophysical effect of electromagnetic RF fields is the heating of the tissue. It is determined not only by the local power absorption and the duration of exposure, but also very significantly by the thermal conductivity and perfusion of the exposed tissues and organs.

[1]  Theodoros Samaras,et al.  Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  G. Brix,et al.  Häufigkeit und Dosis diagnostischer und interventioneller Röntgenanwendungen , 2017, Der Radiologe.

[3]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Virtual population‐based assessment of the impact of 3 Tesla radiofrequency shimming and thermoregulation on safety and B1+ uniformity , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P. Clarke,et al.  Does Magnetic Resonance Brain Scanning at 3.0 Tesla Pose a Hyperthermic Challenge to Term Neonates? , 2016, The Journal of pediatrics.

[5]  Thomas Stephan,et al.  Magnetic vestibular stimulation modulates default mode network fluctuations , 2016, NeuroImage.

[6]  Brian L. Day,et al.  Effect of head pitch and roll orientations on magnetically induced vertigo , 2015, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Simultaneous exposure to MRI‐related static and low‐frequency movement‐induced time‐varying magnetic fields affects neurocognitive performance: A double‐blind randomized crossover study , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Sensory perceptions of individuals exposed to the static field of a 7T MRI: A controlled blinded study , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: the Virtual Population 3.0 , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Multicenter Study of Subjective Acceptance During Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 and 9.4 T , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5–7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms , 2014, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[12]  Oliver Kraff,et al.  Vestibular Effects of a 7 Tesla MRI Examination Compared to 1.5 T and 0 T in Healthy Volunteers , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Omar S Mian,et al.  A dynamic model of the eye nystagmus response to high magnetic fields , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Whole‐body and local RF absorption in human models as a function of anatomy and position within 1.5T MR body coil , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Brian L. Day,et al.  On the Vertigo Due to Static Magnetic Fields , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  MRI‐related static magnetic stray fields and postural body sway: A double‐blind randomized crossover study , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  A cross-over study of effects on the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathoadrenergic system in magnetic field strength exposure from 0 to 7 T , 2013, Stress.

[18]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Cognition and sensation in very high static magnetic fields: a randomized case-crossover study with different field strengths. , 2013, Radiology.

[19]  Jöran Lepsien,et al.  Investigation of higher‐order cognitive functions during exposure to a high static magnetic field , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Effects of magnetic stray fields from a 7 Tesla MRI scanner on neurocognition: a double-blind randomised crossover study , 2012, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[21]  B L Day,et al.  Magnetic field effects on the vestibular system: calculation of the pressure on the cupula due to ionic current-induced Lorentz force , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Aurélien Massire,et al.  Thermal simulations in the human head for high field MRI using parallel transmission , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  E. Neufeld,et al.  Local SAR enhancements in anatomically correct children and adult models as a function of position within 1.5 T MR body coil. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[24]  Keith R Thulborn,et al.  Vital signs and cognitive function are not affected by 23‐sodium and 17‐oxygen magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 9.4 T , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  Hans Wilhelm,et al.  Exposure to high‐field MRI does not affect cognitive function , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  Kazuyuki Saito,et al.  Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  J V Hajnal,et al.  Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  M. Bock,et al.  Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Tomography.

[29]  Observation of changes in neural activity due to the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[30]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Pooled analyses of effects on visual and visuomotor performance from exposure to magnetic stray fields from MRI scanners: Application of the Bayesian framework , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Fritz Schick,et al.  Tissue warming and regulatory responses induced by radio frequency energy deposition on a whole‐body 3‐Tesla magnetic resonance imager , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[32]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.