Magnetic resonance imaging: Recent research on the biological im-pacts of static magnetic and high-frequency electromagnetic fields
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Theodoros Samaras,et al. Pregnant women models analyzed for RF exposure and temperature increase in 3T RF shimmed birdcages , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[2] G. Brix,et al. Häufigkeit und Dosis diagnostischer und interventioneller Röntgenanwendungen , 2017, Der Radiologe.
[3] Niels Kuster,et al. Virtual population‐based assessment of the impact of 3 Tesla radiofrequency shimming and thermoregulation on safety and B1+ uniformity , 2016, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[4] P. Clarke,et al. Does Magnetic Resonance Brain Scanning at 3.0 Tesla Pose a Hyperthermic Challenge to Term Neonates? , 2016, The Journal of pediatrics.
[5] Thomas Stephan,et al. Magnetic vestibular stimulation modulates default mode network fluctuations , 2016, NeuroImage.
[6] Brian L. Day,et al. Effect of head pitch and roll orientations on magnetically induced vertigo , 2015, The Journal of physiology.
[7] Hans Kromhout,et al. Simultaneous exposure to MRI‐related static and low‐frequency movement‐induced time‐varying magnetic fields affects neurocognitive performance: A double‐blind randomized crossover study , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[8] Oliver Speck,et al. Sensory perceptions of individuals exposed to the static field of a 7T MRI: A controlled blinded study , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[9] Niels Kuster,et al. Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: the Virtual Population 3.0 , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[10] Klaus Scheffler,et al. Multicenter Study of Subjective Acceptance During Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 and 9.4 T , 2014, Investigative radiology.
[11] Hans Kromhout,et al. Occupational exposure of healthcare and research staff to static magnetic stray fields from 1.5–7 Tesla MRI scanners is associated with reporting of transient symptoms , 2014, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
[12] Oliver Kraff,et al. Vestibular Effects of a 7 Tesla MRI Examination Compared to 1.5 T and 0 T in Healthy Volunteers , 2014, PloS one.
[13] Omar S Mian,et al. A dynamic model of the eye nystagmus response to high magnetic fields , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.
[14] Niels Kuster,et al. Whole‐body and local RF absorption in human models as a function of anatomy and position within 1.5T MR body coil , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[15] Brian L. Day,et al. On the Vertigo Due to Static Magnetic Fields , 2013, PloS one.
[16] Hans Kromhout,et al. MRI‐related static magnetic stray fields and postural body sway: A double‐blind randomized crossover study , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.
[17] A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al. A cross-over study of effects on the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathoadrenergic system in magnetic field strength exposure from 0 to 7 T , 2013, Stress.
[18] Wolfhard Semmler,et al. Cognition and sensation in very high static magnetic fields: a randomized case-crossover study with different field strengths. , 2013, Radiology.
[19] Jöran Lepsien,et al. Investigation of higher‐order cognitive functions during exposure to a high static magnetic field , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[20] Hans Kromhout,et al. Effects of magnetic stray fields from a 7 Tesla MRI scanner on neurocognition: a double-blind randomised crossover study , 2012, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
[21] B L Day,et al. Magnetic field effects on the vestibular system: calculation of the pressure on the cupula due to ionic current-induced Lorentz force , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.
[22] Aurélien Massire,et al. Thermal simulations in the human head for high field MRI using parallel transmission , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[23] E. Neufeld,et al. Local SAR enhancements in anatomically correct children and adult models as a function of position within 1.5 T MR body coil. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[24] Keith R Thulborn,et al. Vital signs and cognitive function are not affected by 23‐sodium and 17‐oxygen magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain at 9.4 T , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[25] Hans Wilhelm,et al. Exposure to high‐field MRI does not affect cognitive function , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[26] Kazuyuki Saito,et al. Temperature elevation in the fetus from electromagnetic exposure during magnetic resonance imaging , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[27] J V Hajnal,et al. Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.
[28] M. Bock,et al. Basics of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Tomography.
[29] Observation of changes in neural activity due to the static magnetic field of an MRI scanner , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[30] Hans Kromhout,et al. Pooled analyses of effects on visual and visuomotor performance from exposure to magnetic stray fields from MRI scanners: Application of the Bayesian framework , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[31] Fritz Schick,et al. Tissue warming and regulatory responses induced by radio frequency energy deposition on a whole‐body 3‐Tesla magnetic resonance imager , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.
[32] J. Hajnal,et al. Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.