Characterizing the geometry of the Kirkwood-Dirac positive states

The Kirkwood-Dirac (KD) quasiprobability distribution can describe any quantum state with respect to the eigenbases of two observables $A$ and $B$. KD distributions behave similarly to classical joint probability distributions but can assume negative and nonreal values. In recent years, KD distributions have proven instrumental in mapping out nonclassical phenomena and quantum advantages. These quantum features have been connected to nonpositive entries of KD distributions. Consequently, it is important to understand the geometry of the KD-positive and -nonpositive states. Until now, there has been no thorough analysis of the KD positivity of mixed states. Here, we characterize how the full convex set of states with positive KD distributions depends on the eigenbases of $A$ and $B$. In particular, we identify three regimes where convex combinations of the eigenprojectors of $A$ and $B$ constitute the only KD-positive states: $(i)$ any system in dimension $2$; $(ii)$ an open and dense set of bases in dimension $3$; and $(iii)$ the discrete-Fourier-transform bases in prime dimension. Finally, we investigate if there can exist mixed KD-positive states that cannot be written as convex combinations of pure KD-positive states. We show that for some choices of observables $A$ and $B$ this phenomenon does indeed occur. We explicitly construct such states for a spin-$1$ system.

[1]  Nicole Yunger Halpern,et al.  What happens to entropy production when conserved quantities fail to commute with each other , 2023, 2305.15480.

[2]  A. Budiyono,et al.  Quantifying quantum coherence via Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability , 2023, Physical Review A.

[3]  Rui Soares Barbosa,et al.  Quantum circuits measuring weak values and Kirkwood–Dirac quasiprobability distributions, with applications , 2023 .

[4]  D. Arvidsson-Shukur,et al.  Unbounded and lossless compression of multiparameter quantum information , 2022, Physical Review A.

[5]  S. Weigert,et al.  Uncertainty relations for the support of quantum states , 2022, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[6]  G. Chiribella,et al.  Measuring incompatibility and clustering quantum observables with a quantum switch , 2022, Physical review letters.

[7]  M. Lostaglio,et al.  Projective measurements can probe non-classical work extraction and time-correlations , 2022, 2207.12960.

[8]  S. Bievre Relating incompatibility, noncommutativity, uncertainty and Kirkwood-Dirac nonclassicality , 2022, 2207.07451.

[9]  M. Lostaglio,et al.  Kirkwood-Dirac quasiprobability approach to quantum fluctuations: Theoretical and experimental perspectives , 2022, 2206.11783.

[10]  Jianwei Xu Classification of incompatibility for two orthonormal bases , 2022, Physical Review A.

[11]  S. De Bièvre Complete Incompatibility, Support Uncertainty, and Kirkwood-Dirac Nonclassicality. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[12]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Negative Quasiprobabilities Enhance Phase Estimation in Quantum-Optics Experiment , 2021, 2023 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[13]  N. Cerf,et al.  Quantum Wigner entropy , 2021, Physical Review A.

[14]  Nicole Yunger Halpern,et al.  Conditions tighter than noncommutation needed for nonclassicality , 2020, 2009.04468.

[15]  K. Murch,et al.  Weak Measurement of a Superconducting Qubit Reconciles Incompatible Operators. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Lostaglio Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermodynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response. , 2020, Physical review letters.

[17]  T. Banica Complex Hadamard Matrices and Applications , 2019 .

[18]  M. Lostaglio,et al.  Quasiprobability Distribution for Heat Fluctuations in the Quantum Regime , 2019, 1909.11116.

[19]  J. Dressel,et al.  Optimizing measurement strengths for qubit quasiprobabilities behind out-of-time-ordered correlators , 2019, Physical Review A.

[20]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Quantum advantage in postselected metrology , 2019, Nature Communications.

[21]  Ravi Kunjwal,et al.  Anomalous weak values and contextuality: Robustness, tightness, and imaginary parts , 2018, Physical Review A.

[22]  José Raúl González Alonso,et al.  Out-of-Time-Ordered-Correlator Quasiprobabilities Robustly Witness Scrambling. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[23]  Jason Pollack,et al.  Entropic uncertainty relations for quantum information scrambling , 2018, Communications Physics.

[24]  Ryuji Takagi,et al.  Convex resource theory of non-Gaussianity , 2018, Physical Review A.

[25]  A. Serafini Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods , 2017 .

[26]  Nicole Yunger Halpern,et al.  Quasiprobability behind the out-of-time-ordered correlator , 2017, 1704.01971.

[27]  Nicole Yunger Halpern Jarzynski-like equality for the out-of-time-ordered correlator , 2016, 1609.00015.

[28]  H. Hofmann,et al.  Observation of non-classical correlations in sequential measurements of photon polarization , 2016, 1606.00148.

[29]  G S Thekkadath,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Density Matrix of a Quantum System. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[30]  J. Halliwell Leggett-Garg inequalities and no-signaling in time: A quasiprobability approach , 2015, 1508.02271.

[31]  A. Allahverdyan Imprecise probability for non-commuting observables , 2014, 1411.4319.

[32]  J. Dressel Weak Values as Interference Phenomena , 2014, 1410.0943.

[33]  Matthew F Pusey Anomalous weak values are proofs of contextuality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[34]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Observing Dirac's classical phase space analog to the quantum state. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[35]  A. Jordan,et al.  Colloquium : Understanding quantum weak values: Basics and applications , 2013, 1305.7154.

[36]  Marco G. Genoni,et al.  Detecting quantum non-Gaussianity via the Wigner function , 2013, 1304.3340.

[37]  H. Hofmann,et al.  Violation of Leggett–Garg inequalities in quantum measurements with variable resolution and back-action , 2012, 1206.6954.

[38]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Procedure for direct measurement of general quantum states using weak measurement. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[39]  A. Jordan,et al.  Significance of the imaginary part of the weak value , 2011, 1112.3986.

[40]  J. Lundeen,et al.  Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction , 2011, Nature.

[41]  H. Hofmann Uncertainty limits for quantum metrology obtained from the statistics of weak measurements , 2010, 1005.4741.

[42]  U. Leonhardt Essential Quantum Optics: From Quantum Measurements to Black Holes , 2010 .

[43]  Lars M. Johansen,et al.  Quantum theory of successive projective measurements , 2007, 0705.0229.

[44]  D. Gross Hudson's theorem for finite-dimensional quantum systems , 2006, quant-ph/0602001.

[45]  P. O. Boykin,et al.  Real Mutually Unbiased Bases , 2005, quant-ph/0502024.

[46]  A. Luis,et al.  Nonclassicality in weak measurements , 2004, quant-ph/0408038.

[47]  J. Hartle Linear positivity and virtual probability , 2004, quant-ph/0401108.

[48]  L. Johansen Nonclassical properties of coherent states , 2003, quant-ph/0309025.

[49]  Stevenson,et al.  The sense in which a "weak measurement" of a spin-(1/2 particle's spin component yields a value 100. , 1989, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[50]  Vaidman,et al.  How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[51]  J. J. Sakurai,et al.  Modern Quantum Mechanics , 1986 .

[52]  E. Wolf,et al.  Some nonclassical features of phase-space representations of quantum mechanics , 1975 .

[53]  R. Hudson When is the wigner quasi-probability density non-negative? , 1974 .

[54]  Kevin Cahill,et al.  Ordered Expansions in Boson Amplitude Operators , 1969 .

[55]  Leon Cohen,et al.  Can Quantum Mechanics Be Formulated as a Classical Probability Theory? , 1966, Philosophy of Science.

[56]  R. Glauber Coherent and incoherent states of the radiation field , 1963 .

[57]  E. Sudarshan Equivalence of semiclassical and quantum mechanical descriptions of statistical light beams , 1963 .

[58]  H. Margenau,et al.  Correlation between Measurements in Quantum Theory , 1961 .

[59]  A. N. Kolmogorov,et al.  Foundations of the theory of probability , 1960 .

[60]  J. Mayer,et al.  On the Quantum Correction for Thermodynamic Equilibrium , 1947 .

[61]  P. Dirac On the Analogy Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics , 1945 .

[62]  J. Kirkwood Quantum Statistics of Almost Classical Assemblies , 1933 .

[63]  Leon Hirsch,et al.  Fundamentals Of Convex Analysis , 2016 .

[64]  K. E. CAHnL Density Operators and Quasiprobability Distributions * , 2011 .

[65]  R. Omnes Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 1995 .

[66]  G. Folland A course in abstract harmonic analysis , 1995 .

[67]  伏見 康治,et al.  Some formal properties of the density matrix , 1940 .