Use of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation equation for soil water limited conditions in a small forest clearcut

Flint, A.L. and Childs, S.W., 1991. Use of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation equation for soil water limited conditions in a small forest clearcut. Agric. For. Meteorol., 56: 247-260. The Priestley-Taylor equation, a simplification of the Penman equation, was used to allow calculations ofevapotranspiration under conditions where soil water supply limits evapotranspiration. The Priestley-Taylor coefficient, a, was calculated to incorporate an exponential decrease in evapotranspiration as soil water content decreases. The method is appropriate for use when detailed meteorological measurements are not available. The data required to determine the parameter for the a coefficient are net radiation, soil heat flux, average air temperature, and soil water content. These values can be obtained from measurements or models. The dataset used in this report pertains to a partially vegetated clearcut forest site in southwest Oregon with soil depths ranging from 0.48 to 0.70 m and weathered bedrock below that. Evapotranspiration was estimated using the Bowen ratio method, and the calculated Priestley-Taylor coefficient was fitted to these estimates by nonlinear regression. The calculated Priestley-Taylor coefficient (a') was found to be approximately 0.9 when the soil was near field capacity (0.225 cm 3 cm-3). It was not until soil water content was less than 0.14 cm 3 cm -3 that soil water supply limited evapotranspiration. The soil reached a final residual water content near 0.05 cm 3 cm-3 at the end of the growing season.

[1]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  A study of evapotranspiration from a Douglas fir forest using the energy balance approach , 1973 .

[2]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  I. J. Barton,et al.  A Parameterization of the Evaporation from Nonsaturated Surfaces , 1979 .

[4]  T. Black,et al.  A growing season water balance model applied to two Douglas fir stands , 1981 .

[5]  T. A. Black,et al.  Determination of growing season soil water deficits on a forested slope using water balance analysis , 1985 .

[6]  J. Monteith.  Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[7]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Estimating Evaporation and Transpiration from a Row Crop during Incomplete Cover1 , 1976 .

[8]  R. J. Hanks,et al.  Applied Soil Physics , 1992, Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences.

[9]  C. D. Allen,et al.  Equilibrium, Potential and Actual Evaporation from Cropped Surfaces in Southern Ontario , 1973 .

[10]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Advection Modification of the Priestley and Taylor Evapotranspiration Formula1 , 1975 .

[11]  H. Neumann,et al.  Application of the Priestley-Taylor evaporation model to assess the influence of soil moisture on the evaporation from a large weighing lysimeter and class a pan , 1977 .

[12]  T. Black,et al.  Evapotranspiration from Douglas fir stands exposed to soil water deficits , 1979 .

[13]  H. D. Bruin,et al.  A Model for the Priestley-Taylor Parameter , 1983 .

[14]  J. Stewart.  A discussion of the relationships between the principal forms of the combination equation for estimating crop evaporation , 1983 .

[15]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Has the Priestley-Taylor Equation Any Relevance to Forest Evaporation? , 1979 .

[16]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[17]  S. Childs,et al.  Effect of shading, mulching and vegetation control on Douglas-Fir seedling growth and soil water supply , 1987 .

[18]  Robert B. Stewart,et al.  Substantiation of the Priestley and Taylor Parameter α = 1.26 for Potential Evaporation in High Latitudes , 1977 .

[19]  Albert A. M. Holtslag,et al.  A Simple Parameterization of the Surface Fluxes of Sensible and Latent Heat During Daytime Compared with the Penman-Monteith Concept. , 1982 .