Signal Quality Measurements for cDNA Microarray Data

Concerns about the reliability of expression data from microarrays inspire ongoing research into measurement error in these experiments. Error arises at both the technical level within the laboratory and the experimental level. In this paper, we will focus on estimating the spot-specific error, as there are few currently available models. This paper outlines two different approaches to quantify the reliability of spot-specific intensity estimates. In both cases, the spatial correlation between pixels and its impact on spot quality is accounted for. The first method is a straightforward parametric estimate of within-spot variance that assumes a Gaussian distribution and accounts for spatial correlation via an overdispersion factor. The second method employs a nonparametric quality estimate referred to throughout as the mean square prediction error (MSPE). The MSPE first smoothes a pixel region and then measures the difference between actual pixel values and the smoother. Both methods herein are compared for real and simulated data to assess numerical characteristics and the ability to describe poor spot quality. We conclude that both approaches capture noise in the microarray platform and highlight situations where one method or the other is superior.

[1]  R. Haining.  Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences , 1990 .

[2]  J. Besag,et al.  Probabilistic segmentation and intensity estimation for microarray images. , 2006, Biostatistics.

[3]  M. Baerwald,et al.  Discovery of genes implicated in whirling disease infection and resistance in rainbow trout using genome-wide expression profiling , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[4]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[5]  Tracy L. Bergemann,et al.  A Statistically Driven Approach for Image Segmentation and Signal Extraction in cDNA Microarrays , 2004, J. Comput. Biol..

[6]  X. Wang,et al.  Quantitative quality control in microarray image processing and data acquisition. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Image Analysis on cDNA Microarray Data , 2002 .

[8]  Shawn Handran,et al.  Biological Relevance of GenePix Results , 2003 .

[9]  T. Bergemann.  Use of signal quality measurements to gain efficiency in the analysis of cDNA microarray data. , 2010, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[10]  Patrick J. Heagerty,et al.  Weighted empirical adaptive variance estimators for correlated data regression , 1999 .

[11]  Charles Auffray,et al.  'The 39 steps' in gene expression profiling: critical issues and proposed best practices for microarray experiments. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[12]  M. Oh,et al.  Issues in cDNA microarray analysis: quality filtering, channel normalization, models of variations and assessment of gene effects. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  Yan Wu,et al.  Quantitative Quality Control in Microarray Experiments and the Application in Data Filtering, Normalization and False Positive Rate Prediction , 2003, Bioinform..

[14]  Aaas News,et al.  Book Reviews , 1893, Buffalo Medical and Surgical Journal.

[15]  P. Möller,et al.  Evidence of Notch pathway activation in the ectatic ducts of chronic pancreatitis , 2008, The Journal of pathology.

[16]  Aled M. Edwards,et al.  Unfolding of Microarray Data , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[17]  D. Edwards,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2003 .

[19]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Donuts, scratches and blanks: robust model-based segmentation of microarray images , 2005, Bioinform..

[20]  P. Sorger,et al.  Image metrics in the statistical analysis of DNA microarray data , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.