Designing the online oral language learning environment SpeakApps

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on SpeakApps, a major collaborative computer-assisted language learning project, developed based on an open source techno-pedagogical solution to facilitate online oral language production and interaction. Design/methodology/approach – A mixed method approach was incorporated as part of the development process which included a comprehensive literature and practice review, user requirement survey of 815 learner, 61 pilot studies with 7,180 students, construction of qualitative teaching scenarios and a Delphi analysis. Findings – Language learners have limited experience of using synchronous communication tools within language learning contexts. Improving usability features within the Open Educational Resources supported the notion of sustainability and that the provision of the mechanism to indicate quality were vital to support the integrity of open content. Originality/value – The paper provides an overview of the operationalisation of an action-oriented a...

[1]  Grainne Conole,et al.  Chapter VIII The Role of Mediating Artefacts in Learning Design , 2008 .

[2]  Lasse Lipponen,et al.  Acting as Accountable Authors: Creating Interactional Spaces for Agency Work in Teacher Education. , 2011 .

[3]  Christine Appel,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Writing in Practice: An Activity Theoretical Study , 2011 .

[4]  G. Wells Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education , 1999 .

[5]  Glenn Stockwell,et al.  Diversity in environments , 2012 .

[6]  Per Linell Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically : Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making , 2009 .

[7]  N. Garrett Computer‐Assisted Language Learning Trends and Issues Revisited: Integrating Innovation , 2009 .

[8]  Jee Hwan Yun,et al.  The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: a meta-analysis , 2011 .

[9]  Alan M. Taylor,et al.  CALL-Based versus Paper-Based Glosses: Is There a Difference in Reading Comprehension?. , 2009 .

[10]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[11]  Alan M. Taylor,et al.  The Effects of CALL versus Traditional L1 Glosses on L2 Reading Comprehension , 2013 .

[12]  S. Downes Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources , 2007 .

[13]  L. V. Lier The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective , 2004 .

[14]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Learning design - making practice explicit , 2010 .

[15]  Brian North,et al.  Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment , 2009 .

[16]  Christine Appel,et al.  SpeakApps : new tools and activities for the development of speaking skills in a second language , 2012 .

[17]  Gabriela C. Zapata,et al.  Computer-Assisted Instruction and L2 Grammar Accuracy , 2008 .

[18]  Carol A. Chapelle,et al.  A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning , 2013, ReCALL.

[19]  Yong Zhao,et al.  Recent Developments in Technology and Language Learning: A Literature Review and Meta-analysis , 2013 .