High-capacity, transient retention of direction-of-motion information for multiple moving objects.

The multiple-object tracking paradigm (MOT) has been used extensively for studying dynamic visual attention, but the basic mechanisms which subserve this capability are as yet unknown. Among the unresolved issues surrounding MOT are the relative importance of motion (as opposed to positional) information and the role of various memory mechanisms. We sought to quantify the capacity and dynamics for retention of direction-of-motion information when viewing a multiple-object motion stimulus similar to those used in MOT. Observers viewed three to nine objects in random linear motion and then reported motion direction after motion ended. Using a partial-report paradigm and varying the parameters of set size and time of retention, we found evidence for two complementary memory systems, one transient with high capacity and a second sustained system with low capacity. For the transient high-capacity memory, retention capacity was equally high whether object motion lasted several seconds or a fraction of a second. Also, a graded deterioration in performance with increased set size lends support to a flexible-capacity theory of MOT.

[1]  Christopher Mole,et al.  Attention: Philosophical and Psychological Essays , 2011 .

[2]  Todd S. Horowitz,et al.  Which way did it go? Measuring trajectory information in multiple object tracking , 2010 .

[3]  Thomas U. Otto,et al.  Assessing the microstructure of motion correspondences with non-retinotopic feature attribution. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  C F Michaels,et al.  Motion information in iconic memory. , 1976, Acta psychologica.

[5]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[6]  R. Haber.  The impending demise of the icon: A critique of the concept of iconic storage in visual information processing , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Haluk Ogmen,et al.  Multiple-object tracking: A serial attentional process , 2011 .

[8]  S Magnussen,et al.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory , 1999, Psychological research.

[9]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[10]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking , 2001, Cognition.

[11]  Haluk Öğmen,et al.  Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision , 2006, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Grabowecky,et al.  Demand-based dynamic distribution of attention and monitoring of velocities during multiple-object tracking. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  A. Dickson.  On Evolution , 1884, Science.

[14]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Dynamic binding of identity and location information: A serial model of multiple identity tracking , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  J Timothy Petersik,et al.  The Evolution of Explanations of a Perceptual Phenomenon: A Case History Using the Ternus Effect , 2006, Perception.

[16]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[17]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  A source book of Gestalt psychology. , 1939 .

[18]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  No capacity limit in attentional tracking: evidence for probabilistic inference under a resource constraint. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[19]  S. Tripathy,et al.  On the effective number of tracked trajectories in normal human vision. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[20]  Daniel Zaksas,et al.  Stimulus specificity and temporal dynamics of working memory for visual motion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  The Capacity of Visual Short-Term Memory is Set Both by Visual Information Load and by Number of Objects , 2004, Psychological science.

[22]  Srimant P. Tripathy,et al.  Loss of positional information when tracking multiple moving dots: The role of visual memory , 2009, Vision Research.

[23]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[24]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  R. Blake,et al.  Memory for visual motion. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Visual persistence of figures defined by relative motion , 1992, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Hulleman.  The mathematics of multiple object tracking: From proportions correct to number of objects tracked , 2005, Vision Research.

[28]  S. Tripathy,et al.  Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[29]  T. Horowitz,et al.  The role of location and motion information in the tracking and recovery of moving objects , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  Alex O. Holcombe,et al.  Tracking the changing features of multiple objects: Progressively poorer perceptual precision and progressively greater perceptual lag , 2008, Vision Research.

[31]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  The Geometry of Visual Perception: Retinotopic and Nonretinotopic Representations in the Human Visual System , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[32]  Joseph Krummenacher,et al.  A (fascinating) litmus test for human retino- vs. non-retinotopic processing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[33]  O. Braddick,et al.  The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals , 1991, Vision Research.

[34]  William A. Simpson,et al.  Temporal summation of visual motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[35]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Josef Ternus,et al.  The problem of phenomenal identity. , 1938 .

[37]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[38]  S. McKee,et al.  Sequential recruitment in the discrimination of velocity. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.