Group recommendations: approaches and evaluation

Recommender systems have been an active research topic for the past decade. However, most of previous studies have focused on recommendations to a single user. Recently, as group recommender systems have emerged as an expedient field, several interesting approaches have been proposed. However, despite all of these advances, the current generation of group recommendation approaches still needs further improvements to make more effective recommendations. In this paper, we discuss the limitations of existing group recommendation approaches and present possible developments that could lead to provide better group recommendations. We perform extensive experiments with different group recommendation approaches. The results show that the performance of that group recommendation approaches is limited either by the group type or group size and no single approach consistently performs better than the other approaches. The unavailability of real-life data sets uncovers the doubts for the accuracy of evaluation; the lack of standard terminology/procedure for evaluation also could lead to poor evaluation.

[1]  Gediminas Adomavicius,et al.  Toward the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[2]  Kristian J. Hammond,et al.  Flytrap: intelligent group music recommendation , 2002, IUI '02.

[3]  Sebastiano Pizzutilo,et al.  Group modeling in a public space: methods, techniques, experiences , 2005 .

[4]  Jérôme Picault,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Evaluation of Group Profiling Strategies , 2022 .

[5]  Xingshe Zhou,et al.  TV Program Recommendation for Multiple Viewers Based on user Profile Merging , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[6]  Laura Sebastia,et al.  Preference elicitation techniques for group recommender systems , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Lior Rokach,et al.  Recommender Systems Handbook , 2010 .

[8]  Maria Soledad Pera,et al.  A group recommender for movies based on content similarity and popularity , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[9]  John Riedl,et al.  PolyLens: A recommender system for groups of user , 2001, ECSCW.

[10]  Bracha Shapira,et al.  Recommender Systems Handbook , 2015, Springer US.

[11]  Cong Yu,et al.  Group Recommendation: Semantics and Efficiency , 2009, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[12]  Christopher D. Manning,et al.  Introduction to Information Retrieval , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Laura Sebastia,et al.  On the design of individual and group recommender systems for tourism , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Group recommendations with rank aggregation and collaborative filtering , 2010, RecSys '10.

[15]  Barry Smyth,et al.  CATS: A Synchronous Approach to Collaborative Group Recommendation , 2006, FLAIRS.

[16]  Shivakant Mishra,et al.  Enhancing group recommendation by incorporating social relationship interactions , 2010, GROUP.

[17]  Sang-Wook Kim,et al.  On using category experts for improving the performance and accuracy in recommender systems , 2012, CIKM '12.

[18]  Abdulmotaleb El-Saddik,et al.  Tailoring recommendations to groups of users: a graph walk-based approach , 2013, IUI '13.

[19]  Shlomo Berkovsky,et al.  Group-based recipe recommendations: analysis of data aggregation strategies , 2010, RecSys '10.

[20]  Joseph F. McCarthy,et al.  MUSICFX: an arbiter of group preferences for computer supported collaborative workouts , 2000, CSCW '00.