Fuzzy context adaptation through conceptual situation spaces

Context-adaptive information systems (IS) are highly desired across several application domains and usually rely on matching a particular real-world situation to a finite set of predefined situation parameters. To represent context parameters, semantic and non-semantic representation standards are widely used. However, describing the complex and diverse notion of specific situations is costly and may never reach semantic completeness. Whereas not any situation parameter completely equals another, the number of (predefined) representations of situation parameters is finite. Moreover, following symbolic representation approaches leads to ambiguity issues and does not entail semantic meaningfulness. Consequently, the challenge is to enable fuzzy matchmaking methodologies to match real-world situation characteristics to a finite set of predefined situation descriptions. In this paper, we propose conceptual situation spaces (CSS) which enable the description of situation characteristics as members in geometrical vector spaces following the idea of conceptual spaces. Consequently, fuzzy matchmaking is supported by calculating the semantic similarity between the current situation and prototypical situation descriptions in terms of their Euclidean distance within a CSS. Aligning CSS to existing symbolic representation standards, enables the automatic matchmaking between real-world situation characteristics and symbolic parameter representations. To prove the feasibility, we apply our approach to the domain of e-learning.

[1]  Enrico Motta,et al.  An Overview of the OCML Modelling Language , 1998 .

[2]  N. Foo.  Conceptual Spaces—The Geometry of Thought , 2022 .

[3]  Anne M. Cregan.  Symbol Grounding for the Semantic Web , 2007, ESWC.

[4]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL Web Ontology Language Reference-W3C Recommen-dation , 2004 .

[5]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[6]  R. Nosofsky.  Similarity Scaling and Cognitive Process Models , 1992 .

[7]  Carola Eschenbach,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems , 2008 .

[8]  R. Felder,et al.  Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles* , 2005 .

[9]  Andreas Schmidt,et al.  User Context Aware Delivery of E-Learning Material: Approach and Architecture , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[10]  C. Keßler.  Conceptual Spaces for Data Descriptions , 2006 .

[11]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  Multi-Sensor Context-Awareness in Mobile Devices and Smart Artifacts , 2002, Mob. Networks Appl..

[12]  Sabine Graf,et al.  REPRESENTATIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF FELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLES : AN EMPIRICAL MODEL * , 2006 .

[13]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[14]  Paul D. Minton,et al.  Statistics: The Exploration and Analysis of Data , 2002, Technometrics.

[15]  Dip. Ingegneria Informatica,et al.  Investigating relationships within the Index of Learning Styles : a data driven approach , 2007 .

[16]  M. Raubal.  Formalizing Conceptual Spaces , 2004 .

[17]  Stefan Dietze,et al.  Context-Adaptive Learning Designs by Using Semantic Web Services , 2007 .

[18]  John Domingue,et al.  A Semantic Web Services-based Infrastructure for Context-Adaptive Process Support , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007).

[19]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  How to make the Semantic Web more semantic , 2004 .

[20]  Jeff Z. Pan,et al.  Resource Description Framework , 2020, Definitions.