A modified SST k- Turbulence Model to Predict the Steady and Unsteady Sheet Cavitation on 2D and 3D Hydrofoils

The paper presents a study of using a modified SST (Shear-Stress Transport) k- model with a multi-phase mixture flow RANS solver to predict the steady and unsteady cavitating flows around 2D and 3D hydrofoils. Based on Reboud et al [6]’s idea of modifying turbulent viscosity for a RNG k- model, a modification is applied to a SST k- model in the present work. The cavitation is modeled by Schnerr-Sauer’s cavitation model [16]. First, results of 2D NACA0015 foil at two cavitation numbers, =1.6 (stable sheet cavitation) and =1.0 (unsteady with shedding) are compared for different grids and with available experiment data. Then, the problem of the standard SST model in predicting unsteady cavitation is discussed. Finally the results for a 3D twisted hydrofoil are compared with the experiment by Foeth and Terwisga [3]. It is found that with the modified SST k- model the RANS solver is able to predict the essential features like development of reentrant jets, the pinch-off, the shedding of vortex and cloud cavities for the 2D NACA0015 foil at =1.0. For the case at =1.6, the model predicts a high frequency fluctuating sheet cavity with minor shedding at its closure. Compared with the standard SST model, the global quantities like lift, drag, and shedding frequency predicted by the modified model are closer to the experimental data, although considerable discrepancy with the experiment data is noted for the unsteady case at =1.0. In addition, a special type of secondary cavities, developed downstream an upstream-moving collapse cavity and termed as “vortex group cavitation” by Bark et al [1], appears to be observable in the simulation at this condition. The existence of this type of cavity has been reconfirmed in a recent experiment in the SSPA’s cavitation tunnel.

[1]  W. Shyy,et al.  Impact of Turbulence and Compressibility Modeling on Three-Dimensional Cavitating Flow Computations , 2003 .

[2]  C. Merkle,et al.  Computation of Multiphase Mixture Flows with Compressibility Effects , 2002 .

[3]  R. Arndt,et al.  Spectral Characteristics of Sheet/Cloud Cavitation , 2000 .

[4]  W. Shyy,et al.  Interfacial dynamics‐based modelling of turbulent cavitating flows, Part‐2: Time‐dependent computations , 2004 .

[5]  A. K. Singhal,et al.  Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model , 2002 .

[6]  Youcef Aït Bouziad Physical modelling of leading edge cavitation , 2005 .

[7]  Volker Bertram,et al.  A Workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[8]  Olivier Coutier-Delgosha,et al.  Evaluation of the turbulence model influence on the numerical simulations of unsteady cavitation , 2001 .

[9]  J. Sauer,et al.  Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics , 2001 .

[10]  Rickard Bensow,et al.  On some physics to consider in numerical simulation of erosive cavitation , 2009 .

[11]  M. Hoekstra,et al.  The partial cavity on a 2D foil revisited , 2009 .

[12]  Jean-Luc Reboud,et al.  TWO-PHASE FLOW STRUCTURE OF CAVITATION : EXPERIMENT AND MODELLING OF UNSTEADY EFFECTS , 1998 .

[13]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Time‐dependent turbulent cavitating flow computations with interfacial transport and filter‐based models , 2005 .

[14]  Olivier Coutier-Delgosha,et al.  Simulation of unsteady cavitation with a two-equation turbulence model including compressibility effects , 2002 .

[15]  Tobias Huuva Large eddy simulation of cavitating and non-cavitating flow , 2008 .

[16]  F. Menter Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[17]  Günter H. Schnerr,et al.  Shock and Wave Dynamics in Compressible Fliquid Flows with emphasis on Unsteady Load on Hydrofoils and on Caviation in Injection Nozzles , 2006 .

[18]  Esra Sorgüven,et al.  Modified k-¿ model for simulation of cavitating flows , 2003 .