Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: the decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars.

This paper explores social scientists' and humanities (SSH) scholars' integration within the academic medical research environment. Three questions guided our investigation: Do SSH scholars adapt to the medical research environment? How do they navigate their career within a culture that may be inconsistent with their own? What strategies do they use to gain legitimacy? The study builds on three concepts: decoupling, doxa, and epistemic habitus. Twenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted with SSH scholars working in 11 faculties of medicine across Canada. Participants were selected through purposeful and snowball sampling. The data were analyzed by thematic content analysis. For most of our participants, moving into medicine has been a challenging experience, as their research practices and views of academic excellence collided with those of medicine. In order to achieve some level of legitimacy more than half of our participants altered their research practices. This resulted in a dissonance between their internalized appreciation of academic excellence and their new, altered, research practices. Only six participants experienced no form of challenge or dissonance after moving into medicine, while three decided to break with their social science and humanities past and make the medical research community their new home. We conclude that the work environment for SSH scholars in faculties of medicine does not deliver on the promise of inclusiveness made by calls for interdisciplinarity in Canadian health research.

[1]  Henry H. Bauer,et al.  Barriers Against Interdisciplinarity: Implications for Studies of Science, Technology, and Society (STS , 1990 .

[2]  Álvaro Santana Acuña.  How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2012 .

[3]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Practicing Interdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[4]  M. Clark,et al.  Evaluating transdisciplinary science. , 2003, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[5]  S. Brint.  Creating the Future: ‘New Directions’ in American Research Universities , 2005 .

[6]  D. P. Macmynowski,et al.  Pausing at the Brink of Interdisciplinarity: Power and Knowledge at the Meeting of Social and Biophysical Science , 2007 .

[7]  E. Guba,et al.  Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba, "Postpositivism and the Naturalist Paradigm," pp. 14-46 in Yvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.* , 1985 .

[8]  F. O. Ramirez.  Accounting for Excellence: Transforming Universities into Organizational Actors , 2010 .

[9]  K. Huutoniemi,et al.  Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals , 2012 .

[10]  G. Regehr,et al.  Biomedical scientists' perception of the social sciences in health research. , 2008, Social science & medicine.

[11]  S. Reeves,et al.  Key trends in interprofessional research: A macrosociological analysis from 1970 to 2010 , 2013, Journal of interprofessional care.

[12]  B. Paterson,et al.  A meeting of minds: interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[13]  P. Jeffrey.  Smoothing the Waters , 2003 .

[14]  Gabriele Bammer,et al.  Solving problems through transdisciplinary research , 2010 .

[15]  P. Rosenfield,et al.  The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[16]  M. Lamont,et al.  Fairness as Appropriateness , 2009 .

[17]  Creso M. Sá,et al.  ‘Interdisciplinary strategies’ in U.S. research universities , 2008 .

[18]  B. Hodges,et al.  Boundary-Work in the Health Research Field: Biomedical and Clinician Scientists’ Perceptions of Social Science Research , 2009 .

[19]  David J. Hess,et al.  Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalizaztion , 2007 .

[20]  Karri A. Holley.  Interdisciplinary Strategies as Transformative Change in Higher Education , 2009 .

[21]  J. Todd.  Social transformation, collective categories, and identity change , 2005 .

[22]  Gwen Ottinger,et al.  Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting , 2010, Science, technology & human values.

[23]  Georgina Born,et al.  Logics of interdisciplinarity , 2008 .

[24]  P. Armstrong.  Advancing interdisciplinary health research: a synergism not to be denied , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[25]  B. Greenwood,et al.  The contribution of social science research to malaria prevention and control. , 2002, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[26]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social Learning and Water Resources Management , 2007 .

[27]  T. Klein,et al.  Evaluation of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research , 2010 .

[28]  Victoria Millar,et al.  The ‘paradox of interdisciplinarity’ in Australian research governance , 2013 .

[29]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment , 2009 .

[30]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World , 2012 .