Evaluation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions for provocation testing in patients with asthma.

The airway response to the inhalation of ultrasonically nebulised distilled water was determined in 55 asthmatic patients and 16 normal subjects. We calculated the dose of water required to induce a 20% reduction (PD20) in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) by measuring the output of the nebuliser and the volume ventilated by each subject. Forty-eight of the asthmatic patients had a PD20 of 9 ml or less but three patients required as much as 24 ml. A PD20 was not recorded in the normal subjects and the challenge was stopped after 33 ml. In 12 patients the challenge was repeated within six months and the airway response was shown to be reproducible at equivalent doses of water. In a separate group of 11 patients there was, however, a highly significant reduction in the percentage fall in FEV1 when equivalent doses of water were given on two occasions 40 minutes apart. When the temperature of the inhaled water was increased from 22 degrees C to 36 degrees C eight of 10 patients had a similar change in FEV1 with equivalent doses of water. The airways obstruction induced by the inhalation of water was readily reversed with salbutamol administered by aerosol. In some patients a challenge with water or 3.6% saline was repeated after pretreatment with sodium cromoglycate, atropine methonitrate, and verapamil hydrochloride, all given as aerosols. The airway response to the equivalent dose of water or saline was significantly reduced after treatment with sodium cromoglycate but not atropine or verapamil.

[1]  S. Anderson,et al.  Sensitivity to heat and water loss at rest and during exercise in asthmatic patients. , 1982, European journal of respiratory diseases.

[2]  A. Toth,et al.  Bronchial hyperreactivity in response to inhalation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions of distilled water and saline , 1982, British medical journal.

[3]  E. Walters,et al.  Measurement of bronchial reactivity: a question of interpretation. , 1981, Thorax.

[4]  S. Anderson,et al.  Bronchial hyperreactivity in response to inhalation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions of distilled water and saline. , 1981, British medical journal.

[5]  K. Patel The effect of verapamil on histamine and methacholine‐induced bronchoconstriction , 1981, Clinical allergy.

[6]  A. Tattersfield,et al.  Measurement of bronchial reactivity: a question of interpretation. , 1981, Thorax.

[7]  K. Patel Calcium antagonists in exercise-induced asthma. , 1981, British medical journal.

[8]  M. Dixon,et al.  THE ACTION OF SODIUM CROMOGLYCATE ON ‘C’ FIBRE ENDINGS IN THE DOG LUNG , 1980, British journal of pharmacology.

[9]  L. Lichtenstein,et al.  Basophil "releasability" in patients with asthma. , 1980, The American review of respiratory disease.

[10]  L. Allegra,et al.  Non-specific broncho-reactivity obtained with an ultrasonic aerosol of distilled water. , 1980, European journal of respiratory diseases. Supplement.

[11]  S. Anderson,et al.  An evaluation of pharmacotherapy for exercise-induced asthma. , 1979, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[12]  M. Kaliner,et al.  Cyclic AMP, ATP, and reversed anaphylactic histamine release from rat mast cells. , 1974, Journal of immunology.

[13]  G. W. Snedecor STATISTICAL METHODS , 1967 .

[14]  R. Altounyan VARIATION OF DRUG ACTION ON AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION IN MAN. , 1967, Thorax.

[15]  Goldman Hi,et al.  Respiratory function tests; normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. , 1959 .

[16]  M. Becklake,et al.  Respiratory function tests; normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results. , 1959, American review of tuberculosis.