Intraobserver and Interobserver Agreement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Reparability of Peripheral Meniscal Tears: What Criteria Really Matter?

Abstract The objective of the study was the determination of the intra- and interobserver agreement of three magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria for reparability: a peripheral rim smaller than 4 mm, a tear longer than 10 mm, and homogenous aspect of meniscal tissue. In two rounds with an interval of at least 6 weeks, three orthopedic surgeons and three musculoskeletal radiologists studied the preoperative MRI scans of 63 patients with a longitudinal full-thickness medial or lateral meniscal tear. All patients had an arthroscopic meniscal repair. The blinded images were evaluated measuring the tear length and rim width and meniscal aspect was classified. Agreement was calculated using the linear-weighted kappa coefficient (κ) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Examiner agreement strength was defined according to the guidelines of Landis and Koch. Intraobserver agreement was poor to good (κ, 0.12–0.72) for the classification of the meniscal aspect and decreased in lateral meniscal tears. The interobserver agreement for meniscal aspect was mainly poor to fair (κ, 0.09–0.53). The intraobserver reliability for measurement of the length of the meniscal tear was moderate to excellent (ICC, 0.51–0.80) for all observers in both rounds and moderate to good (ICC, 0.59–0.73) for measurement of the peripheral rim width. The interobserver agreement on tear length and rim width was moderate in both rounds (ICC, 0.58 and 0.50 in round 1; 0.50 and 0.50 in round 2, respectively). Tear length and rim width are the only two measurements with moderate to good agreement. However, these measurements do not predict reparability of longitudinal meniscal tears on MRI images.

[1]  B. Graf,et al.  MR imaging-based diagnosis and classification of meniscal tears. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  Kenneth S. Lee,et al.  MRI characteristics of healed and unhealed peripheral vertical meniscal tears. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Meniscus body position, size, and shape in persons with and persons without radiographic knee osteoarthritis: quantitative analyses of knee magnetic resonance images from the osteoarthritis initiative. , 2013, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  K. Shino,et al.  Change of signal intensity in the displaced medial meniscus after its reduction on MRI , 2013, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[5]  R. Brophy,et al.  Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: a systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes. , 2011, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  A. Motamedi,et al.  Can the Reparability of Meniscal Tears Be Predicted With Magnetic Resonance Imaging? , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[7]  T. Stein,et al.  Long-Term Outcome After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair Versus Arthroscopic Partial Meniscectomy for Traumatic Meniscal Tears , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  K. Shinki,et al.  Comparison of the accuracy rates of 3-T and 1.5-T MRI of the knee in the diagnosis of meniscal tear. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Jason J. Z. Liao,et al.  Sample size calculation for an agreement study , 2009, Pharmaceutical statistics.

[10]  A. D. De Smet,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Meniscus , 2009, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[11]  P. Thoreux,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to predict reparability of longitudinal full-thickness meniscus lesions , 2008, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  P. Thoreux,et al.  Bucket-handle meniscal lesions: magnetic resonance imaging criteria for reparability. , 2006, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Why lateral meniscectomy is more dangerous than medial meniscectomy. A finite element study , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  M G Myriam Hunink,et al.  MR imaging of the menisci and cruciate ligaments: a systematic review. , 2003, Radiology.

[15]  N. Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of reparability of isolated semilunar lateral meniscus tears by magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[16]  W. Totty,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Tool to Predict Meniscal Reparability , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[17]  H. Genant,et al.  "Magic-angle" phenomenon: a cause of increased signal in the normal lateral meniscus on short-TE MR images of the knee. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[20]  A. D. De Smet,et al.  Clinical, MRI, and arthroscopic findings associated with failure to diagnose a lateral meniscal tear on knee MRI. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.