Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search.

Contextual cuing is the enhancement of visual search when the configuration of distractors has been experienced previously. It has been suggested that contextual cuing relies on associative learning between the distractor locations and the target position. Four experiments examined the effect of pre-exposing configurations of consistent distractors on subsequent contextual cuing. The findings demonstrate a facilitation of subsequent cuing for pre-exposed configurations compared to novel configurations that have not been pre-exposed. This facilitation suggests that learning of repeated visual search patterns involves acquisition of not just distractor-target associations but also associations between distractors within the search context, an effect that is not captured by the Brady and Chun (2007) connectionist model of contextual cuing. We propose a new connectionist model of contextual cuing that learns associations between repeated distractor stimuli, enabling it to predict an effect of pre-exposure on contextual cuing.

[1]  J. H. Howard,et al.  An abbreviated implicit spatial context learning task that yields greater learning , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[2]  Markus Conci,et al.  Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Tal Makovski,et al.  Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Markus Conci,et al.  Here Today, Gone Tomorrow – Adaptation to Change in Memory-Guided Visual Search , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  J. Pearce.  Similarity and discrimination: a selective review and a connectionist model. , 1994, Psychological review.

[6]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Nesting of Search Contexts Within Natural Scenes : Evidence From Contextual Cuing , 2010 .

[7]  M. Chun,et al.  Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context , 2002 .

[8]  D. Shanks,et al.  Investigating cue competition in contextual cuing of visual search. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Angela A. Manginelli,et al.  Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? , 2009, Psychological research.

[10]  Markus Conci,et al.  Contextual learning of multiple target locations in visual search , 2012 .

[11]  Gustavo A. Vázquez,et al.  Implicit sequence learning and contextual cueing do not compete for central cognitive resources. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  D. Shanks,et al.  Awareness in Contextual Cuing , 2007 .

[13]  Markus Conci,et al.  Contextual remapping in visual search after predictable target-location changes , 2011, Psychological research.

[14]  Gail M. Rosenbaum,et al.  Guidance of spatial attention by incidental learning and endogenous cuing. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Short Article: Recognition and Attention Guidance during Contextual Cueing in Real-World Scenes: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Spatial constraints on learning in visual search: modeling contextual cuing. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Yuji Takeda,et al.  Selective learning of spatial configuration and object identity in visual search , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Pearce.  A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[22]  J. Pearce.  Similarity and Discrimination: A Selective Review and a Connectionist Model , 1994 .

[23]  David R Shanks,et al.  Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search , 2006 .

[26]  Melina A. Kunar,et al.  Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Connecting the past with the present: how do humans match an incoming visual display with visual memory? , 2005, Journal of vision.

[28]  J. Pearce.  Evaluation and development of a connectionist theory of configural learning , 2002, Animal learning & behavior.

[29]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  What is learned in spatial contextual cuing— configuration or individual locations? , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.