Lateral Asymmetries of Pupillary Responses

We wanted to learn if pupillary changes induced by looking and attending to stimuli on the right and left are asymmetrical. In humans, there are hemispheric asymmetries in the control of attention-arousal systems. Because attention and arousal may influence pupil size, asymmetric pupillary responses may be seen when looking and attending in different directions. Twelve right-handed, healthy volunteers served as subjects. Using infrared pupillography, we recorded changes of pupillary diameter while subjects were looking and attending to the stimuli on the right and left sides of space. For the one second following a saccade, there are three phasic pupillary responses, an initial constriction (C1) then a dilation (D1), followed by constriction (C2). Evaluation of these three responses revealed right-left asymmetries with more pupil dilation (D1) when looking to the stimulus on the right. Our results suggest that subjects are more aroused when looking to the right than when looking to the left.

[1]  K. Heilman,et al.  Hypoarousal in patients with the neglect syndrome and emotional indifference , 1978, Neurology.

[2]  H. N. Magoun.  Thomas, Springfield, Illinois , 1965 .

[3]  David G. Cogan,et al.  Neurology of the ocular muscles , 1949 .

[4]  J. Beatty.  Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. , 1982 .

[5]  H M Simpson,et al.  Pupillary Changes during a Decision-Making Task , 1969, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  G. Moruzzi,et al.  Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. , 1949, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Shapiro,et al.  Hemi-Inattention Resulting from Left Hemisphere Brain Damage During Infancy , 1986, Cortex.

[8]  A. Ardila,et al.  Topography of the hemi-inattention syndrome. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Pupillary Response to Value-Linked Words , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  P. Halligan,et al.  The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke. , 1993, Age and ageing.

[11]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect after cingulectomy , 1973, Neurology.

[12]  J. Segundo,et al.  Effects of cortical stimulation on electro-cortical activity in monkeys. , 1955, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  K. Heilman,et al.  Thalamic neglect. Possible role of the medial thalamus and nucleus reticularis in behavior. , 1981, Archives of neurology.

[15]  B. Goldwater.  Psychological significance of pupillary movements. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  M. Raichle,et al.  Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography , 1991, Nature.

[17]  V. Henderson.  Speech fluency in crossed aphasia. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  K. Heilman,et al.  Evoked potential in neglect. , 1977, Archives of neurology.

[19]  [Right unilateral auditory agnosia following left lenticular hemorrhage]. , 1999, Revue neurologique.

[20]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  Pupil Size as a Measure of Arousal during Information Processing , 1967, Nature.

[21]  S. W. Ranson,et al.  PATHWAYS FOR PUPILLARY CONSTRICTION: LOCATION OF SYNAPSES IN THE PATH FOR THE PUPILLARY LIGHT REFLEX AND OF CONSTRICTOR FIBERS OF CORTICAL ORIGIN , 1935 .

[22]  K. Heilman,et al.  Right hemisphere dominance for attention , 1980, Neurology.

[23]  Ian H. Robertson,et al.  Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies edited by Ian H. Robertson and John C. Marshall , 1994 .

[24]  R. Nebes,et al.  Reliability and validity of some handedness questionnaire items. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  J. Schwankhaus,et al.  Neurologic findings in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism , 1989, Neurology.

[26]  R J Davidson,et al.  Patterns of cerebral lateralization during cardiac biofeedback versus the self-regulation of emotion: sex differences. , 1976, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Frontal lobe neglect in man , 1972, Neurology.

[28]  Allan H. Ropper,et al.  Evoked potentials in clinical medicine (second of two parts). , 1982 .

[29]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[30]  J. L. Conway,et al.  Deficits in eye movements following frontal eye-field and superior colliculus ablations. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillary responses during information processing vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test scores. , 1979, Science.

[32]  D Kahneman,et al.  Perceptual Deficit during a Mental Task , 1967, Science.

[33]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.