Current constrained voltage scaled reconstruction (CCVSR) algorithm for MR-EIT and its performance with different probing current patterns

Conventional injected-current electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques can be combined to reconstruct high resolution true conductivity images. The magnetic flux density distribution generated by the internal current density distribution is extracted from MR phase images. This information is used to form a fine detailed conductivity image using an Ohm's law based update equation. The reconstructed conductivity image is assumed to differ from the true image by a scale factor. EIT surface potential measurements are then used to scale the reconstructed image in order to find the true conductivity values. This process is iterated until as topping criterion is met. Several simulations are carried out for opposite and cosine current injection patterns to select the best current injection pattern for a 2D thorax model. The contrast resolution and accuracy of the proposed algorithm are also studied. In all simulation studies, realistic noise models for voltage and magnetic flux density measurements are used. It is shown that, in contrast to the conventional EIT techniques, the proposed method has the capability of reconstructing conductivity images with uniform and high spatial resolution. The spatial resolution is limited by the larger element size of the finite element mesh and twice the magnetic resonance image pixel size.

[1]  A Korjenevsky,et al.  Magnetic induction tomography: experimental realization. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[2]  Byung Il Lee,et al.  J-substitution algorithm in magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): phantom experiments for static resistivity images , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  K. Boone,et al.  Imaging with electricity: report of the European Concerted Action on Impedance Tomography. , 1997, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[4]  Impedance imaging using induced currents , 1995 .

[5]  D. Isaacson Distinguishability of Conductivities by Electric Current Computed Tomography , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Ozlem Birgul,et al.  Imaging electrical current density using 0.15 T magnetic resonance imaging system , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  N.G. Gencer,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: induced-current imaging achieved with a multiple coil system , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Brian H. Brown,et al.  Limitations to SV determination from APT images , 1989, Images of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,.

[9]  J. Newell,et al.  Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[10]  Y. Birgül,et al.  Use of the Magnetic Field Generated by the Internal Distribution of Injected Currents for Electrical Impedance Tomography (MR-EIT) , 1998 .

[11]  Eung Je Woo,et al.  Impedance tomography using internal current density distribution measured by nuclear magnetic resonance , 1994, Optics & Photonics.

[12]  R. Henkelman,et al.  Sensitivity of magnetic-resonance current-density imaging , 1992 .

[13]  M. Neuman,et al.  Impedance computed tomography algorithm and system. , 1985, Applied optics.

[14]  I Frerichs,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) in applications related to lung and ventilation: a review of experimental and clinical activities. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[15]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  Equipotential line method for magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography , 2002 .

[16]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  A model-based method for phase unwrapping , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[17]  Ohin Kwon,et al.  Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT): simulation study of J-substitution algorithm , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Yusuf Ziya Ider,et al.  Measurement of AC magnetic field distribution using magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  R. Mark Henkelman,et al.  Rotating Frame RF Current Density Imaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Andrew A. Maudsley,et al.  Magnetic field measurement by NMR imaging , 1984 .

[21]  Adnan Koksal,et al.  A quasi-static analysis for a class of induced-current EIT systems using discrete coils , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  J C de Munck,et al.  The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem - a simulation study , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[23]  F Demsar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of alternating electric currents. , 2001, Magnetic resonance imaging.