We're in it together: interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services

The workload needed for managing privacy and publicness in current social network services (SNSs) is placed on individuals, yet people have few means to control what others disclose about them. This paper considers SNS-users' concerns in relation to online disclosure and the ways in which they cope with these both individually and collaboratively. While previous work has focused mainly on individual coping strategies, our findings from a qualitative study with 27 participants suggest that collaborative strategies in boundary regulation are of additional importance. We present a framework of strategies for boundary regulation that informs both theoretical work and design practice related to management of disclosure in SNSs. The framework considers disclosure as an interpersonal process of boundary regulation, in which people are dependent on what others choose to disclose about them. The paper concludes by proposing design solutions supportive of collaborative and preventive strategies in boundary regulation that facilitate the management of disclosure online.

[1]  I. Altman.  Privacy Regulation: Culturally Universal or Culturally Specific? , 1977 .

[2]  J. Ivey.  Focus groups. , 2011, Pediatric nursing.

[3]  Andrew Howes,et al.  The problem of conflicting social spheres: effects of network structure on experienced tension in social network sites , 2009, CHI.

[4]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  Adults and social network websites , 2009 .

[5]  Asko Lehmuskallio.  'A photo is not an extension of me, it's plain surface': views of users of a Web 2.0 photo-sharing site on photos and privacy , 2007 .

[6]  Frederic Stutzman,et al.  Boundary regulation in social media , 2012, CSCW.

[7]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook , 2006, Privacy Enhancing Technologies.

[8]  Heather Richter Lipford,et al.  Moving beyond untagging: photo privacy in a tagged world , 2010, CHI.

[9]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[10]  V. Derlega,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships: Self-Disclosure in Personal Relationships , 2006 .

[11]  Jacob Kramer-Duffield,et al.  Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in facebook , 2010, CHI.

[12]  Anna Cinzia Squicciarini,et al.  WWW 2009 MADRID! Track: Security and Privacy / Session: Web Privacy Collective Privacy Management in Social Networks , 2022 .

[13]  Kate Raynes-Goldie,et al.  Aliases, Creeping, and Wall Cleaning: Understanding Privacy in the Age of Facebook , 2010, First Monday.

[14]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world , 2003, CHI '03.

[15]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[16]  D. Boyd.  Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics , 2010 .

[17]  J. Freedman,et al.  Conceptions of Crowding. (Book Reviews: Crowding and Behavior; The Environment and Social Behavior. Privacy, Personal Space. Territory, Crowding) , 1975 .

[18]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[19]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  All My People Right Here, Right Now: management of group co-presence on a social networking site , 2009, GROUP.

[20]  Bruce Schneier,et al.  A Taxonomy of Social Networking Data , 2010, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[21]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? , 2010, First Monday.

[22]  S. Stern.  Producing Sites , Exploring Identities : Youth Online Authorship , 2008 .

[23]  Mor Naaman,et al.  Over-exposed?: privacy patterns and considerations in online and mobile photo sharing , 2007, CHI.